JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Tuesday, May 20, 2025

Martyring our saints

by

20120625

Ver­na St Rose-Greaves wasn't the biggest los­er in Fri­day's Cab­i­net reshuf­fle; we were. Fired from the post of Min­is­ter of Gen­der, Youth and Child De­vel­op­ment, Ver­na's on­ly sin was that she was too com­mit­ted to serv­ing this coun­try ac­cord­ing to her con­science, by seek­ing to pro­tect our women and chil­dren. In­stead of be­ing laud­ed for this, Ver­na was thrown un­der the bus by the PP Gov­ern­ment. Giv­en the choice be­tween the Chris­t­ian/ con­ser­v­a­tive vote and the smooth in­tro­duc­tion of the gen­der pol­i­cy Ver­na cham­pi­oned, the PP Gov­ern­ment chose the votes, go­ing against what its leader Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar had seemed to stand for be­fore she be­came Prime Min­is­ter. I say with­out apol­o­gy that this makes Ver­na a po­lit­i­cal mar­tyr to the cow­ardice of the PP Gov­ern­ment and its fail­ure to stand for what it seemed to be­lieve in be­fore it formed the Gov­ern­ment. There are those who feel Ver­na was fired be­cause of the Cheryl Miller episode. In March Miller was tak­en from her desk in Ver­na's min­istry and com­mit­ted to the men­tal hos­pi­tal against Miller's will. It's pos­si­ble this is what led to Ver­na's fir­ing.

How­ev­er, it's more like­ly that the Gov­ern­ment saw too many protests against the gen­der pol­i­cy, and the imag­i­nary LGBT mar­riage lob­by. (Sure­ly it's imag­i­nary, since most LGBT or­gan­i­sa­tions in the coun­try haven't said a peep about gay mar­riage, and have on­ly asked for equal hu­man rights for LGBT folk.) Ver­na, be­ing Ver­na, stood up for what she be­lieved in and pre­sent­ed a gen­der pol­i­cy that wouldn't em­bar­rass her as a long­stand­ing women's ac­tivist. Would that the PP Gov­ern­ment had the same courage. I am not Ver­na St Rose-Greaves' friend, but I have in­ter­viewed her many times in my ca­pac­i­ty as a re­porter. She was al­ways a straight­for­ward, blunt ad­vo­cate for the peo­ple she served as a so­cial work­er; and she was pas­sion­ate and well in­formed about women's and chil­dren's rights and the wrongs done to them. In fact, Ver­na was the go-to in­ter­view on any such top­ic, be­cause she was one of the very few pub­lic ser­vants who would risk de­fy­ing the pub­lic ser­vant ban on talk­ing to the me­dia. She might have looked mad to play "warn­er woman," com­plete with bell, dur­ing the Sum­mit of the Amer­i­c­as in 2009 in Port-of-Spain, but I agreed with her choice to protest the then-gov­ern­ment's hold­ing of an ex­pen­sive in­ter­na­tion­al sum­mit and spend­ing mil­lions of dol­lars to spruce up the parts of the coun­try the del­e­gates would see while our women and chil­dren were be­ing mur­dered and suf­fer­ing egre­gious pover­ty.

Ja­da Loutoo re­port­ed in the News­day at the time, "Af­ter leav­ing her post on Wright­son Road, St Rose-Greaves [...] walked down to the foun­tain at the Sum­mit Vil­lage on the Port-of-Spain wa­ter­front prom­e­nade, where she was ac­cost­ed by se­cu­ri­ty of­fi­cers who took away her bell [...] and called for back­up." Now it's 2012 and once again Ver­na's bell has been tak­en away. She has been whisked out of gov­ern­ment back in­to the shad­ows where her cries for jus­tice and equal­i­ty will be eas­i­er to ig­nore. She told the Guardian in an in­ter­view pub­lished on Sun­day, "I was of­fered an am­bas­sado­r­i­al po­si­tion in Cos­ta Ri­ca, which I chose not to take be­cause I didn't come in­to gov­ern­ment to go to Cos­ta Ri­ca... The one thing that I am sure of, my voice will not be si­lenced. Death will have to si­lence me." As Atak­lan sang, "I'd rather be a shad­ow in the dark than a big fool in the spot­light." Years ago, I had a con­ver­sa­tion with a friend of mine who was once a politi­cian. I told him I felt politi­cians were the low­est of the low, op­por­tunists who had on­ly en­tered the field for what pow­er and wealth they could gain. I cit­ed the in­fa­mous de­c­la­ra­tion by Des-mond Cartey–"All ah we thief"–as proof that in this coun­try peo- ple en­ter pol­i­tics to line their pock­ets and the pock­ets of their friends and fam­i­lies. My friend cor­rect­ed me: far from be­ing the slim­i­est oc­cu­pa­tion, pol­i­tics was among the high­est call­ings an in­di­vid­ual could fol­low. Be­ing a politi­cian was an op­por­tu­ni­ty for ser­vice to one's coun­try and one's fel­low man, he said. What could be no­bler than that? But the take-away les­son of Ver­na's fir­ing is that con­science and in­tegri­ty have no place in T&T pol­i­tics. When you en­ter the gov­ern­ment, leave your con­science at home. Ver­na's fir­ing is a loss for the coun­try be­cause it spells out in bold, clear let­ters to ser­vice-mind­ed in­di­vid­u­als, "Don't go in­to pol­i­tics."


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored