JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, July 28, 2025

Cipriani's Life as CRL Prism

by

20160222

LR James' ear­ly at­tempt at bi­og­ra­phy, The Life of Cap­tain Cipri­ani, is a fas­ci­nat­ing piece of work. It presents a snap­shot in­to a pe­ri­od in Trinida­di­an his­to­ry, and a per­spec­tive that is both new and or­di­nary, via an episod­ic study of its sub­ject.

The Cap­tain is a fig­ure whose name lives on in the name of the labour col­lege, and whose stat­ue stands ever im­pos­ing­ly on the prom­e­nade at bot­tom of Fred­er­ick Street. But he's not present in pub­lic con­scious­ness the way, say, TUB But­ler is.

To re­call Arthur Cipri­ani's life and times is rea­son enough to ap­pre­ci­ate the reis­sue of James's fledg­ling work of 1932, and its spin­off pam­phlet, The Case for West-In­di­an Self Gov­ern­ment, which was pub­lished by Leonard and Vir­ginia Woolf's Hog­a­rth press in 1933.

As Brid­get Br­ere­ton's ex­cel­lent in­tro­duc­to­ry es­say to the con­tem­po­rary Duke Uni­ver­si­ty Press edi­tion points out, the work is an "ap­pren­tice" work. It's not ac­tu­al­ly a bi­og­ra­phy, it's of­ten shal­low, and in places fa­tal­ly par­ti­san.

Its val­ue is that it presents an ear­ly glimpse of a tech­nique which James would per­fect lat­er: in­ter­twin­ing pub­lic and per­son­al his­to­ry and bi­og­ra­phy to il­lu­mi­nate the un­lit cor­ners of his­to­ry as a whole, as he did mas­ter­ful­ly in The Black Ja­cobins and Be­yond a Bound­ary.

Cipri­ani first came to promi­nence dur­ing the First World War when he (as a white of­fi­cer) stood up for the black West In­di­an Reg­i­ment's sol­diers, who were giv­en me­nial du­ties to per­form dur­ing wartime, and with­held from ac­tion on the front­lines.

The rea­son for this was racism. A sep­a­rate con­tin­gent from Trinidad, the (white) Mer­chants and Planters' Con­tin­gent, held them­selves apart from the en­list­ed men. Cipri­ani was the ex­cep­tion.

On his re­turn to Trinidad, Cipri­ani con­tin­ued his "strug­gle for the bare­foot man." One of his first pub­lic speech­es in 1919 which en­deared him to the mass­es was one which point­ed out the war prof­i­teer­ing by Trinida­di­an mer­chants.

Cipri­ani went on to be­come the leader of The Work­ing­men's As­so­ci­a­tion (TWA) and be­came an elect­ed mem­ber of the leg­is­la­ture when lim­it­ed fran­chise was grant­ed in 1925. James un­der­took to write a bi­og­ra­phy be­cause of his ad­mi­ra­tion for the Cap­tain, but al­so ev­i­dent­ly be­cause it pro­vid­ed an en­tr�e in­to the hot top­ic among West In­di­an and Trinida­di­an in­tel­lec­tu­als of the time (the 30s and 40s): race, na­tion­al­ism, and self-rule.

James was a mem­ber of the Bea­con Group, which was built on the ef­forts of the for­mi­da­ble Al­bert Gomes. Or­tho­doxy to­day has it the Bea­con Group (James, Al­fred Mendes, Gomes, Ralph Men­tor and oth­ers) rep­re­sent­ed a lit­er­ary and po­lit­i­cal awak­en­ing in Trinidad, and was a cat­a­lyst for na­tion­al­ist con­scious­ness via its epony­mous jour­nal.

It's worth men­tion­ing here that the In­di­an com­po­nent of the pop­u­la­tion fig­ures not at all in James' con­scious­ness. In­di­ans are giv­en a mere para­graph, al­though there were ac­tive In­do po­lit­i­cal groups in Trinidad at the time. Cipri­ani's as­sault on Sar­ran Teelucks­ingh, one of the vice pres­i­dents of TWA over the con­tro­ver­sial di­vorce leg­is­la­tion in the late 20s, frac­tured the in­ter­ra­cial plat­form to which the TWA as­pired. This was glossed over and the at­tack omit­ted by James.

This omis­sion has been not­ed many times and need not be gone in­to here, ex­cept to say na­tion­al­ism was (as it re­mains in some quar­ters) a black and white af­fair. In that re­gard, James dis­sects the stra­ta and seg­ments of "cre­ole so­ci­ety"–the white British colo­nials, the French Cre­ole aris­toc­ra­cy, the coloured and mixed-race as­pi­rants to so­cial hi­er­ar­chy, and the am­bi­tious and tal­ent­ed black mid­dle class.

He shows how each fits in­to the un­sta­ble mo­sa­ic, where na­tive tal­ent was sup­pressed, and mediocre colo­nials were placed in­to po­si­tions of im­por­tance. The dis­as­trous con­se­quences of that, we still live with to­day. (In­ci­den­tal­ly, much of what James re­ports here was en­act­ed in VS Naipaul's The Mim­ic Men. Yet James is praised, Naipaul re­viled.)

James fo­cus­es on a few episodes of Cipri­ani's life, like the war, or de­bates in the leg­is­la­ture, to il­lus­trate the ab­sur­di­ties and enor­mi­ties of Crown Colony gov­ern­ment. The sys­tem of gov­ern­ment was such that all pow­er resided in the gov­er­nor, and once he want­ed some­thing, there was no way around it.

In ef­fect, gov­er­nance was a luck and chance game: it all de­pend­ed on who you got. If the gov­er­nor was de­cent, you got pro­gres­sive gov­ern­ment. If not, well, you got what we've had since in­de­pen­dence. The leg­is­la­ture was com­prised of elect­ed and ap­point­ed mem­bers, and the elect­ed mem­bers could nev­er car­ry a vote be­cause of their small num­bers.

Iron­i­cal­ly, James would write in a lat­er vol­ume (Par­ty Pol­i­tics in the West In­dies in 1962) that even when the elu­sive dream of in­de­pen­dence had been achieved, the sys­tem con­tin­ued to work thus­ly. That is, one man (E Williams) con­tin­ued to make all the de­ci­sions, de­spite the ac­cou­trements of de­mo­c­ra­t­ic in­sti­tu­tions de­signed to check and bal­ance. Williams in­sti­tu­tion­alised this, but Messrs Robin­son, Man­ning and Pan­day were all ea­ger acolytes of the sta­tus quo, and con­tin­ued the tra­di­tion when their turns came.

One of the el­e­ments of the book that's been praised, but which might not be so well-liked now is James' con­tempt for the "brown" and "coloured" mixed-race class­es. He speaks about their fawn­ing at­tempts to seek out the so­ci­ety of the lighter skinned, and their will­ing­ness to ex­ist on the fringes of that so­ci­ety, paid for by their wealth, sim­ply for the prox­im­i­ty.

He writes of the "trans­ports of joy in­to which men, rich and pow­er­ful, are thrown by a few words from the colo­nial sec­re­tary's wife or the Chief Jus­tice's daugh­ter." And less flat­ter­ing­ly, but, one sus­pects, clos­er to the truth: "In a Crown Colony, one would find men who would walk down Fred­er­ick St in their draw­ers if the Gov­er­nor should ask them to do so."

The po­lit­i­cal and com­mer­cial im­pli­ca­tions of these at­ti­tudes were clubs and ca­bals which con­trolled busi­ness, so­ci­ety and a great deal of pow­er based on fi­at, chance and whim. This sense of help­less­ness no doubt seeped in­to the cul­ture of the na­tion, and re­mains there to­day.

That is the val­ue of these seem­ing­ly dis­parag­ing anec­do­tal in­ci­dents: they show the na­ture and prove­nance of the so­cial tox­ins which in­fest our so­ci­ety to the present.

While the busi­ness and po­lit­i­cal worlds may have changed own­ers and con­trollers, and the own­ers and man­agers are os­ten­si­bly na­tive, the fun­da­men­tal at­ti­tudes, the need for ob­se­quious­ness, and the fun­da­men­tal el­e­ments of whim­sy and ego, and the ab­sence of ra­tio­nal­i­ty in mat­ters of the gravest im­por­tance, have not changed. Ex­am­ples of this in­clude the (then) gov­ern­ment's con­tor­tions to give a Cana­di­an com­pa­ny tax ex­emp­tion for its pro­vi­sion of elec­tric­i­ty ser­vices to Port-of-Spain, and its re­fusal to in­tro­duce trade union leg­is­la­tion in Trinidad.

That's or­di­nary cor­rup­tion, but as for racial dis­crim­i­na­tion, the is­sue was more com­pli­cat­ed than it would ap­pear. James writes of Cipri­ani's rais­ing the is­sue of dis­crim­i­na­tion at the Im­pe­r­i­al Col­lege of Trop­i­cal Agri­cul­ture against coloured men, in the leg­is­la­ture, on­ly to have coloured mem­bers con­tra­dict him. He writes, telling­ly that the na­ture of the Gov­er­nor's ap­point­ments led to men fill­ing po­si­tions which were more con­cerned with their own wel­fare than the peo­ple's.

"A per­son gain­ing his first im­pres­sion of pol­i­tics from a read­ing of some of these de­bates," he writes, "would con­clude that it was not the sole busi­ness of gov­ern­ment to gov­ern prop­er­ly, but a favour be­ing con­ferred up­on the peo­ple."

The more things change, the more they stay the same. For these in­sights in­to the an­tecedents of our present so­cial and po­lit­i­cal cul­ture, the book is worth read­ing. For his­to­ri­ans and so­ci­ol­o­gists who wish to con­struct an ac­cu­rate and not ro­man­ti­cised (if not out­right in­vent­ed) pic­ture of Trinida­di­an his­to­ry, this book pro­vides a valu­able in­gre­di­ent. (In­ter­est­ing­ly, James does not men­tion ca­lyp­so or Car­ni­val as hav­ing any po­lit­i­cal sig­nif­i­cance.)

Aside from its val­ue to Trinida­di­ans, to schol­ars, read as part of James' oeu­vre, it is a fas­ci­nat­ing point on his men­tal con­tin­u­um, an in­sight in­to the evo­lu­tion of that prodi­gious mind.

BOOK IN­FO

CLR James: The Life of Cap­tain Cipri­ani: An Ac­count of British Gov­ern­ment in the West In­dies,

Duke Uni­ver­si­ty Press.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored