It may very well be that professors Selwyn Cudjoe, Ken Ramchand and the “Heavy Roller” Hochoy Charles are all deserving of the country’s highest award. However, once again given in a very political frame, effectively by the Prime Minister, whoever that individual may be, the system naturally generates the claim of political bias.
And notwithstanding arguments to the contrary and bold statements by Professor Cudjoe, who is really the one targeted for the charge of political bias, that he does not care about his detractors, the political smell of the choice-making of the award assails the nostrils in a nauseous manner and obviously annoys Professor Cudjoe.
Undoubtedly, the political connection to the awards, whether given by the People’s National Movement or the United National Congress in government, cheapens recognition and impacts negatively on what should be a time of national celebration of the country’s achievers. The process also corrupts the nation and makes it less of a sturdy, respected institution which speaks for the whole in such matters as recognition of those who have served the country with distinction. What the blatant nepotism also does is to further entrench corruption in the nation.
That the political parties in government have consistently, deliberately and with uncaring boldness kept the power of patronage against consistent calls for depoliticising the awards system by removing it far from the prime minister to an independent committee to adjudicate upon who is worthy, smacks of contempt by the political elite for the population.
At another level of the award distribution is when in this instance, an achiever, a contributor, one whose undeniable invention of the soca which has transformed the native calypso, that is Ras Shorty I, could only attract a Humming Bird Medal Gold, then something must be wrong with the system of recognising those who have made contributions which have impacted not only locally but internationally and over generations and continues so to do.
At another level is the memory of the Grandmaster Kitchener (Aldwyn Roberts) and master artist Leroy Clarke, two undeniably great contributors, feeling so disrespected that they had refused less than the highest awards of the nation.
Then there was the instance of one of the country’s greatest labour leaders, Tubal Uriah “Buzz” Butler, who revolutionsed the rights of workers here and across the Caribbean, being overtaken in receiving an award by another butler, the one who served Prime Minister Dr Eric Williams.
That the three major political parties which have been in office since Independence have ignored the logic of lodging the selection of deserving nationals for awards to an independent committee, which will receive requests, research on its own, completely beyond being influenced by the government and political parties, is yet another instance of narrow political interests prevailing over national considerations. It’s simply disrespectful to the nation.
In the talk which goes around and comes around amongst the politicians and their political parties about nation building, continuing refusal to build a nation together in fairness and integrity is thus cheap ole talk.
Is it that only cleavage to a political party and culture will allow for the work of citizens to be recognised and so be able to nourish national development? We should have long passed that stage.