JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, July 14, 2025

The pastor, politician and the polygraph

by

Dr Varma Deyalsingh
367 days ago
20240712
 Association of Psychiatrists of T&T secretary Dr Varma Deyalsingh

Association of Psychiatrists of T&T secretary Dr Varma Deyalsingh

The Blue Fairy in the fa­ble of Pinoc­chio stat­ed, “Lies can be eas­i­ly recog­nised. There are two kinds of them: those with short legs, and those with long noses.”

If it were on­ly so easy, some peo­ple would not be faced with the co­nun­drum they find them­selves in.

Guardian Me­dia’s ar­ti­cle of Ju­ly 8, ‘Who lied?’ raised this ques­tion when our PM made the star­tling an­nounce­ment of an at­tempt­ed coup by mem­bers of the SSA and the sub­se­quent de­nial by its for­mer di­rec­tor, Pas­tor Ma­jor Roger Best, who de­scribed this “witch-hunt” as “pre­pos­ter­ous” and “lu­di­crous” and “filled with many de­grees of dis­in­for­ma­tion to suit a par­tic­u­lar nar­ra­tive that was based on in­cor­rect in­for­ma­tion.”

Po­lit­i­cal sci­en­tist Dr Bish­nu Ra­goonath com­ment­ed, “If you tell me some­body was plan­ning a coup to over­throw the Gov­ern­ment and no­body was charged, then some­thing is wrong if you have that in­for­ma­tion and you’re not us­ing it.” Ra­goonath be­lieved that Dr Row­ley was at­tempt­ing to put two dif­fer­ent is­sues to­geth­er: “One was on the SSA, and the oth­er was on Gary Grif­fith grant­i­ng Firearm User’s Li­cences. So whether the Prime Min­is­ter is try­ing to link there or not, I don’t know.”

He con­tin­ued, “But this last set of in­for­ma­tion about an at­tempt­ed coup was stretch­ing it a bit ... it re­mind­ed me of when Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar was in pow­er and there was a sug­ges­tion about a coup at­tempt to over­throw the gov­ern­ment, and that’s why we had a State of Emer­gency. This time there is no State of Emer­gency, but we are hear­ing the same pro­pa­gan­da.”

A plot to stage a coup is a trea­so­nous act. Some hope it may just be sil­ly sea­son po­lit­i­cal rhetoric, while oth­ers say it could be an at­tempt to cre­ate a link to take down a cer­tain pub­lic fig­ure.

Some be­lieve that the weapon­i­sa­tion of the Sedi­tion Act was used against Sat Ma­haraj, Wat­son Duke, and Christo­pher Hugh­es. So who do we be­lieve—the politi­cian or the pas­tor?

Both pro­fes­sions are seen as mas­ters of de­cep­tion and ma­nip­u­la­tion, and psy­chol­o­gist Richard Christie ac­tu­al­ly stud­ied the thought process­es and ac­tions of politi­cians and re­li­gious lead­ers when he de­vel­oped his psy­cho­me­t­ric MACH-IV test. In 1979, psy­chol­o­gist BM De­Paulo pub­lished in the Jour­nal of Per­son­al­i­ty and So­cial Psy­chol­o­gy that the abil­i­ty of the av­er­age per­son to catch a liar is typ­i­cal­ly lit­tle more than a chance and rarely above 60 per cent. Psy­chol­o­gist Dr Paul Ek­man, au­thor of Telling Lies, pub­lished a study in 1991 that showed that even though Se­cret Ser­vice agents are bet­ter at de­tect­ing un­truths, they on­ly get it right two out of three times.

Ek­man de­vel­oped a tech­nique us­ing a high-speed cam­era to cap­ture some­one’s mi­croex­pres­sions, which hap­pen in a frac­tion of a sec­ond, and re­play them at much slow­er speeds to de­ci­pher lies. He has trained many in the field of in­ter­ro­gat­ing crim­i­nals and ter­ror­ists.

On June 21, the Mis­cel­la­neous Pro­vi­sions Bill was unan­i­mous­ly passed in our Low­er House, to use poly­graph tests for mem­bers of the pro­tec­tive ser­vices, and cer­tain of­fices with­in the Ju­di­cial and Le­gal Ser­vice and the civ­il ser­vice. I be­lieve the his­to­ry of an in­di­vid­ual as well as Ek­man’s tech­niques should al­so be in­cor­po­rat­ed, due to con­cerns about the poly­graph’s ac­cu­ra­cy, in­ad­mis­si­bil­i­ty in courts, the fact that cer­tain per­son­al­i­ty types or the use of cer­tain med­ica­tion and biofeed­back tech­niques can ob­fus­cate the re­sults.

In 2003, the USA com­mit­tee of the Na­tion­al Re­search Coun­cil con­clud­ed that poly­graph ac­cu­ra­cy is 81 to 91 per cent, which is “well above chance, though well be­low per­fec­tion.”

Pres­i­dent of the PSWA, Act­ing ASP Gideon Dick­son, voiced his con­cerns with this bill. He ques­tioned the ac­cu­ra­cy of the “pseu­do­science” poly­graph test and called for oth­er pro­fes­sion­als, in­clud­ing politi­cians, mag­is­trates, and doc­tors, to be test­ed.

Let­ter writer Scar­let Benois-Sel­man al­so made a sim­i­lar call when she wrote, “This con­tro­ver­sy high­lights a sig­nif­i­cant is­sue: fair­ness. If poly­graph test­ing is deemed nec­es­sary for one group, then lead­ers should lead by ex­am­ple and un­der­go the same scruti­ny. The ho­n­our as­so­ci­at­ed with ti­tles like “ho­n­ourable” should not be tak­en light­ly. Those who hold such ti­tles should read­i­ly em­brace the op­por­tu­ni­ty to de­fend their in­tegri­ty and lead by ex­am­ple. Con­se­quent­ly, every mem­ber of the Gov­ern­ment should be re­quired to take poly­graph tests as a pre­req­ui­site for their po­si­tions, and al­so dur­ing of­fice.

“Lead­ing by ex­am­ple is cru­cial ... This would en­sure a uni­form stan­dard of in­tegri­ty across all branch­es of the Gov­ern­ment and the pub­lic ser­vice, fos­ter­ing greater pub­lic trust.”

Well, both Dick­son and Benois-Sel­man of­fer a so­lu­tion. The main play­ers can vol­un­tar­i­ly sub­mit to a poly­graph test. If not, like the Blue Fairy, we may have to keep look­ing at the noses and legs of those in­volved.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored