You are here

Did Rudy go too far with pensions?

Thursday, June 26, 2014
BG View
Minister of Housing Dr Roodal Moonilal

I am in favour of this country rewarding those who have served it during their working lives as well as is possible in their retirement. But, as far as this column is concerned, the new pension arrangements for parliamentarians and judicial officers—that have been the subject of significant debate over the last fortnight—propose changes to the local pension system that are too radical and too rich.


While the amount of additional expenditure on the proposed pensions may not “break” the Treasury, if these bills are accepted without significant amendments, they would provide a dangerous precedent and a benchmark for public-sector unions that definitely would break the Treasury.


Having awarded themselves huge pension increases, what moral authority would the Government in general and the Minister of Finance in particular have to tell the president of the Public Services Association that a public servant after 34 years of service is not entitled to 100 per cent of their final salary as a pension? 


User comments posted on this website are the sole views and opinions of the comment writer and are not representative of Guardian Media Limited or its staff.

Guardian Media Limited accepts no liability and will not be held accountable for user comments.

Guardian Media Limited reserves the right to remove, to edit or to censor any comments.

Any content which is considered unsuitable, unlawful or offensive, includes personal details, advertises or promotes products, services or websites or repeats previous comments will be removed.

Before posting, please refer to the Community Standards, Terms and conditions and Privacy Policy