A Caribbean Airlines (CAL) aircraft that will be put as an addition to its airbridge fleet is expected to arrive this weekend.
You are here
Creditors dig in for battle of Belize
The restructuring of Belize’s 2029 “superbond” may become a drawn-out battle, as creditors keep the country waiting for a formal response to proposals that could see them take a haircut of up to 80 per cent on the net present value of their holdings.
“We are working through our analysis and expect to share our views with the government within two to three weeks,” said Mike Gerrard, managing director of BroadSpan Capital, which is advising a committee of creditors that claims to have a majority interest in the US$544m instrument.
A US$23m coupon payment was missed last Monday, days after Prime Minister Dean Barrow said the country “simply cannot afford “. That comment suggested the sum will not be honoured during the grace period, which expires on September 19. It is also unlikely an acceptable offer will be put to creditors by that date.
“We still have hopes it will be a 2012 restructuring, but that will need accommodation from each side,” said Sebastian Espinosa, managing director of White Oak Advisory, which is advising the government. At the moment, the two sides appear to be far apart. The situation is exacerbated by additional liabilities, estimated by the government at US$300M, in the form of compensation due to former shareholders of Belize’s national electricity and telecoms companies, which were compulsorily nationalised between 2009 and 2011.
No settlement has yet been reached with these claimants, and the government wants to roll their claims into a wider debt restructuring. Some progress had been made with Fortis, which used to own 70 per cent of Belize Electricity. However, negotiations with former shareholders of Belize Telemedia, mostly connected to Michael Ashcroft, are more drawn-out.
Ashcroft is a former deputy chairman of the British Conservative party and one of Belize’s richest residents. The former Belize Telemedia shareholders, who are being advised by New State, say they should be paid up to US$300m, while the government has valued the business at Bz$72.3m (US$36.2m).
If a mid-point is taken between the two sides’ valuations, then the additional liabilities related to both nationalised companies will add as much as 20 per cent of Belize’s GDP to its debts. Belize has indicated it would like to pay the compensation in any new bonds resulting from the restructuring of the superbond.
“It is clear to us that ignoring the compensation outstanding to former shareholders (of the nationalised companies) will not serve the interests of Belize or its bondholders,” said Mark Espat, who heads the debt review team in the Belize government.
Lee Buchheit, partner at law firm Cleary Gottlieb, which is advising the government, acknowledged that the issues surrounding the nationalised entities make the restructuring “a little different” from normal deals, but added: “A superbond restructuring is not contingent on settlement of the compensation issues.”
Belize has outlined three options to replace the superbond. One is a two per cent bond maturing in 2062 with no principal reduction and a 15-year grace period. The others involve a 45 per cent reduction of principal but a 2042 maturity. One has no grace period and a step-up coupon from one per cent to two per cent in 2019 and four per cent in 2026, and the other a 3.5 per cent coupon after a five-year grace period.
The 2029 bonds are currently trading at 34-37 cents on the dollar, suggesting the market believes that Belize will improve the terms by a significant amount. But one senior portfolio manager was skeptical, saying the final offer could be nearer 20 cents on the dollar.
User comments posted on this website are the sole views and opinions of the comment writer and are not representative of Guardian Media Limited or its staff.
Guardian Media Limited accepts no liability and will not be held accountable for user comments.
Guardian Media Limited reserves the right to remove, to edit or to censor any comments.
Any content which is considered unsuitable, unlawful or offensive, includes personal details, advertises or promotes products, services or websites or repeats previous comments will be removed.
User profiles registered through fake social media accounts may be deleted without notice.