JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Tuesday, July 29, 2025

The real cost of violating net neutrality

Why block­ing VoIP means block­ing in­no­va­tion

by

20140802

A re­cent move by two ma­jor Caribbean mo­bile providers to block ac­cess to In­ter­net-based tele­pho­ny ser­vices–in­clud­ing sev­er­al pop­u­lar Voice over In­ter­net Pro­to­col (VoIP) ap­pli­ca­tions–has brought the is­sue of net neu­tral­i­ty to the at­ten­tion of Caribbean mo­bile phone users.

The core prin­ci­ple of net neu­tral­i­ty is that In­ter­net ser­vice providers should treat all da­ta pass­ing across their net­works equal­ly, not dis­crim­i­nat­ing by user, gen­er­a­tor, con­tent, site, plat­form, ap­pli­ca­tion or equip­ment.

A joint state­ment from the T&T chap­ters of the In­ter­net So­ci­ety (ISOC-TT) and the In­sti­tute of Elec­tri­cal and Elec­tron­ics En­gi­neers (IEEE-TT), along with the T&T Com­put­er So­ci­ety, de­scribed the move to block cer­tain ser­vices as "a vi­o­la­tion of the con­cept of net­work neu­tral­i­ty".

"The ac­tion of these ISPs sets a dan­ger­ous prece­dent and could have a dele­te­ri­ous im­pact on ef­forts to lever­age ICTs for both eco­nom­ic and so­cial de­vel­op­ment across the re­gion," said Bevil Wood­ing, an In­ter­net Strate­gist and Caribbean Out­reach Man­ag­er at the re­search non-prof­it Pack­et Clear­ing House.

"His­tor­i­cal­ly, ISPs have act­ed as gate­ways to the In­ter­net and the many ap­pli­ca­tions, ser­vices and con­tent that live on the com­put­er servers con­nect­ed to it. But their role was nev­er in­tend­ed to be as gate­keep­ers, de­ter­min­ing which da­ta bits and Web ser­vices should load bet­ter or worse," Wood­ing stat­ed in a strong­ly word­ed piece on the sub­ject.

His view was shared by a num­ber of oth­er re­gion­al and in­ter­na­tion­al ob­servers, in­clud­ing the Latin Amer­i­ca and Caribbean Net­work In­for­ma­tion Cen­tre (Lac­nic), one of five Re­gion­al In­ter­net Reg­istries in the world which pro­vide num­ber re­source al­lo­ca­tion and reg­is­tra­tion ser­vices for the ad­min­is­tra­tion of the glob­al In­ter­net.

Dig­i­cel's vi­o­la­tion of this cen­tral prin­ci­ple "sets a dan­ger­ous prece­dent", said Car­los Mar­tinez, Chief Tech­ni­cal Of­fi­cer at Lac­nic, speak­ing to the T&T Guardian in a tele­phone in­ter­view.

Mar­tinez said, "The In­ter­net as we know it is a plat­form to de­liv­er pack­ets from one end to an­oth­er end. It's def­i­nite­ly not the role of the ISP to de­cide where pack­ets can go and where they can­not go. It would be the equiv­a­lent of the mail de­cid­ing which let­ters it wants to de­liv­er or not...Why should an ISP de­cide which ap­pli­ca­tions they want to sup­port or not?

If there are ap­pli­ca­tions that the user finds use­ful, they should be able to use them. They are pay­ing for the ser­vice."

That no­tion is a pil­lar of net neu­tral­i­ty, Mar­tinez ex­plained.

"The end-to-end prin­ci­ple says that every de­vice on the In­ter­net should be able to send a pack­et to any oth­er de­vice on the In­ter­net with­out ask­ing per­mis­sion from in­ter­me­di­ate net­works and with­out be­ing trans­lat­ed in tran­sit. This ba­sic prin­ci­ple is re­spect­ed across the In­ter­net."

Evolv­ing busi­ness mod­els

The sce­nario now play­ing out with Dig­i­cel and Lime in the Caribbean is noth­ing new. Pro­po­nents of net neu­tral­i­ty have long warned against tel­cos seek­ing to dis­crim­i­nate against cer­tain kinds of da­ta in or­der to re­move com­pe­ti­tion, cre­ate ar­ti­fi­cial scarci­ty, and oblige sub­scribers to sub­scribe to their oth­er­wise un­com­pet­i­tive ser­vices.

As Wood­ing put it, "They are in fact dis­crim­i­nat­ing against a cer­tain type of da­ta traf­fic that chal­lenges their busi­ness mod­el. And in­stead of in­no­vat­ing and evolv­ing, their re­sponse is to sti­fle com­pe­ti­tion, and fright­en the re­gion's gov­ern­ments with threats of di­min­ished rev­enues."

Ac­cord­ing to Mar­tinez, al­though VoIP ser­vices do not con­sume as much band­width as ser­vices like on­line video stream­ing, they hurt the very prof­itable tra­di­tion­al voice traf­fic and mes­sag­ing ser­vices that op­er­a­tors pro­vide. This is why in more de­vel­oped mar­kets, ser­vice providers are re­struc­tur­ing their busi­ness mod­els to treat with the rise of da­ta ser­vices, and the de­cline of voice ser­vices.

Mar­tinez said, "The is­sue is that their busi­ness mod­el is threat­ened. The busi­ness mod­el that is be­ing di­rect­ly threat­ened by these new ap­pli­ca­tions is the tra­di­tion­al way that we pro­vide the voice ser­vice. If oth­er mech­a­nisms prove more ef­fi­cient and cheap­er for the user, who are you pro­tect­ing if you fil­ter those ser­vices out? Are you pro­tect­ing the user? You're pro­tect­ing the prof­it mar­gins of an­oth­er ser­vice! And that's def­i­nite­ly not in the best in­ter­est of the user."

Com­pe­ti­tion push­es providers to op­ti­mise their net­works. By sti­fling com­pe­ti­tion, providers are es­sen­tial­ly re­veal­ing an un­der­ly­ing un­will­ing­ness to up­grade their ser­vices and evolve their old busi­ness mod­els, Mar­tinez said.

Michele Mar­ius ed­i­tor of the pop­u­lar Caribbean tech­nol­o­gy blog, ICT Pulse points out: "Tel­cos' bat­tle against VoIP is not new–it is at least 10 years old. Dur­ing that time, tech­nol­o­gy evolved, mak­ing VoIP eas­i­er and even more ac­ces­si­ble, and it is like­ly that new­er and eas­i­er al­ter­na­tives will con­tin­ue to emerge. How­ev­er, what has not been as ev­i­dent is the will­ing­ness of the tel­cos to be more proac­tive in ex­plor­ing new­er busi­ness mod­els, based on changes that have been oc­cur­ring in the in­dus­try."

En­abling in­no­va­tion

In a state­ment is­sued short­ly af­ter news of Dig­i­cel block­ing VoIP broke in T&T, Colum­bus Com­mu­ni­ca­tions, the largest provider of whole­sale broad­band in the re­gion, said, "...From what we un­der­stand, no oth­er ma­jor in­ter­na­tion­al provider en­gages in the prac­tice of block­ing le­git­i­mate VOIP and sim­i­lar apps...This prac­tice can be con­sid­ered puni­tive to cus­tomers, re­strict­ing their choic­es and cer­tain­ly putting them at a dis­ad­van­tage com­pared to in­ter­na­tion­al coun­ter­parts. Cus­tomers' ex­pec­ta­tion to­day is that they can ac­cess da­ta and voice 'on the go', at their con­ve­nience, on their de­vice of choice.

Colum­bus main­tains its po­si­tion that broad­band en­ables all cur­rent and fu­ture in­no­va­tions."

"If you think of Face­book and Twit­ter and all the so­cial me­dia that we have now, they have been per­mit­ted to grow with­out re­quir­ing per­mis­sion from a provider...And this is some­thing that we need to pre­serve; this is what has al­lowed the In­ter­net to be­come such a rapid­ly grow­ing ex­am­ple of tech­nol­o­gy adop­tion...If we give the in­ter­me­di­ate net­works the right to de­cide what kinds of traf­fic they can de­liv­er, we are cre­at­ing an en­vi­ron­ment that is ad­verse to in­no­va­tion."

"Right now the on­ly coun­try that I know that fil­ters Voice over IP is Cu­ba. Not even Venezuela dur­ing the ri­ot­ing ear­li­er this year messed with Voice over IP," Mar­tinez said. "In coun­tries where the reg­u­la­tor is strong enough, we're go­ing to see things play out dif­fer­ent­ly. What wor­ries me is what hap­pens in coun­tries where the reg­u­la­tor is not strong enough."

Ex­perts agree that by fail­ing to cre­ate and en­force rules that ac­tu­al­ly re­quire In­ter­net ser­vice providers to of­fer equal qual­i­ty of ser­vice to all da­ta, Caribbean reg­u­la­tors are ul­ti­mate­ly hurt­ing con­sumers, harm­ing eco­nom­ic di­ver­si­fi­ca­tion and hin­der­ing in­no­va­tion.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored