While the Israel model-constructed around historical persecution, a divine right of return, a Jewish character and a billion dollar US lobby-is not applicable or comparable to the Trinidadian-Tobagonian question, Ambassador Charles may be on to something special and deserving of immediate undertaking. Yes, the community is better served when, through data collection, we can identify our strengths and weaknesses. Undoubtedly, this will foster the spirit of camaraderie, appreciation, gratitude, all elements intrinsic to a robust and influential community. But this is only realisable when we can establish well heeled and fully operational organisations that promote the interests of all, irrespective of religious and political affiliations. An umbrella association to which varying groups can be better served should also be considered. Realistically though, this will call for an every degree of sacrifice. Are we in the Diaspora prepared to fulfil this obligation? Only time will tell. One thing is certain: In a land where we and future generations are impacted by policy decisions on a state and federal level, we must coalesce with other immigrants-many already well positioned-toward a common poli- tical agenda. This way we can hold our representatives accountable and be truly part of the political process -for the betterment of our native land and our adopted home.
Dr Glenville Ashby is a foreign correspondent for the Guardian