The recent revelations involving Sasha Mohammed, the engagements adviser to the Prime Minister, and editorial and reporting staff at the Express newspaper have come into prominence with reports about warnings for Mohammed and the response of her attorneys that there is no criminal offence to answer. Indeed, there are questions about the basis on which a warning was issued to Mohammed.
While these matters work themselves out, there are fundamental questions that arise about the work habits and profile of the engagement adviser to the Prime Minister. Firstly, this appointment is one of direct patronage as are some of the other contractual appointments at a high level that are made directly by any Prime Minister in her office. Previous Prime Ministers have made similar appointments and this Prime Minister is no different.The reality is that anyone who is appointed to a sensitive position in the Office of the Prime Minister that requires them to interact directly and on a daily basis with the Prime Minister must have the security of the Prime Minister as their number one priority regardless of whatever else they may do in that office. To that end, their cell phone(s), laptop computer, work computer and home computer must be kept secure at all times.
If anyone in that magic circle of personal advisers around the Prime Minister were to allow someone else to gain access to their home computer, their work computer, their laptop computer or their cell phone(s), they would have compromised the security and safety of the Prime Minister of this country. Working in the Office of the Prime Minister is a 24/7 operation that knows no boundary between office hours and after office hours. You are effectively at work and on call all day and every day. If you openly admit that any of your environments (home or work) can be compromised, then you are a thret to the Prime Minister.
If the Prime Minister is comfortable with permitting a clear and present danger to her safety and security to continue to exist inside of her magic circle of personal advisers, then that is a revelation about how much emphasis she places on her personal and political safety. At the time of writing, the Prime Minister had still not broken her silence on the issue. Every leak that her political enemies want to engineer from inside her office can be charged to the weakest link in the chain.It appears that personal and political safety may be ignored if the home environment of Mohammed could permit the figment of someone's political-neophyte mind to create Janice Thomas to terrorise an editor and a reporter at a major newspaper in this country.
Janice Thomas and her behaviour could hardly be a creation of the Prime Minister and is denied by Mohammed as her creation. But Janice Thomas was created inside the household of Mohammed using her home computer and the IP address assigned to her by FLOW Trinidad Ltd for her internet account. It appears that the criminal law in this country is very underdeveloped on the subject of e-mail harassment, but the Police Service seem to be ahead of the curve based on the work of their Cyber Unit in this matter.The ghost of Janice Thomas was born inside Mohammed's home and expressed its threat to freedom of the press from its warped imagination with a very dark side that revealed the behaviour of an apparition who would be prepared to go further into the dark side. Such a ghost must be stopped if the Prime Minister of this country is to be kept safe.
The ghost of Janice Thomas
So far the ghost of Janice Thomas has put the Prime Minister on the defensive and another one of her advisers has issued a statement that attracted further political fire about her availability for interviews. The source of the problem is the ghost of Janice Thomas. As long as the Prime Minister continues to tolerate the existence of this ghost inside the Mohammed household, she and her administration will be put at great political risk. This ghost has the potential to follow Mohammed wherever she goes and based on the photo profiles that have been published in the print media, it appears that the image of a hedonistic lifestyle represents an area of personal life that can be exploited politically, eg covert activist agents seated at restaurant tables nearby, etc.
Every Prime Minister has their own style of operation and the way in which they may tolerate security breaches within their magic circle of advisers tells you something about them. There is always a balance between loyalty, patronage and ability and in making appointments these factors have to be considered with ability being the most important.Issuing a statement that places doubt on whether Mohammed created and behaved like Janice Thomas or not only serves to compromise the personal and political safety of the Prime Minister. If the Prime Minister is comfortable with that, then the political risk for her and for her entire Government falls at her feet.
