While the news of the much touted alleged plot to assassinate the Prime Minister and some Government Ministers was blasting through the local, regional and international media, the electoral machinery in Guyana went into full operation last Monday, as Guyanese flocked to the polls in what would prove to be a historic election.
Ethnic voting patterns
I had the privilege of witnessing the elections first hand, as an official International Observer of the Mission of the Organisation of American States (OAS). The actual voting on Monday reflected a high level of organisation and a well-oiled electoral machinery. Undoubtedly, Guyana's democracy has advanced considerably as election staff, party representatives and voters alike, expressed deep faith in the electoral process. Guyana's population of 762,498 is extremely diverse with two major ethnic groups, similar to that of Trinidad. Indo-Guyanese constitute 43.5 per cent of the population and have remained predominantly rural while Afro-Guyanese comprise 30.2 per cent and constitute the majority of the urban population. The remaining 16.7 per cent are divided into a number of different groups including Mixed, Chinese and Amerindians, amongst others.
The ethnic distribution of the population has given rise to ethnic voting patterns as the two major parties, the Indo-dominated People's Progressive Party (PPP) and the Afro-dominated People's National Congress (PNC) have traditionally been racially aligned. The PPP has evolved into the People's Progressive Party/Civic (PPP/C) and the PNC is now a coalition of parties known as A Partnership for National Unity (APNU). The two other smaller parties contesting the 2011 elections include the Alliance for Change (AFC) viewed as a mixed race party pretty much like the Congress of the People (COP) in Trinidad and The United Force (TUF). The presidential candidate for the PPP/C is typically Indo-Guyanese while the prime ministerial candidate is Afro-Guyanese and vice versa for the PNC (now APNU).
Proportional representation
Unlike most of the other anglophone Caribbean nations which follow the Winner Takes It All Westminster parliamentary political model, Guyana is a semi-presidential parliamentary republic which follows the system of proportional representation. Voters are expected to cast two votes in the electoral ballot-one for the presidential elections and another for the regional elections. The voters vote for a party, not a candidate, as only party symbols are options appearing in the ballot. At the national level, Guyana elects a unicameral legislature known as the National Assembly which has 65 members. Since 2001, the National Assembly has comprised 25 members who are elected via proportional representation from ten geographic constituencies. Forty members are also chosen on the basis of proportional representation from National lists named by the political parties.
Each of the ten regions sends at least one MP to the national parliament. The distribution of seats is based on the size of the population. Of the 25 seats for the ten regions to the national parliament, Region 4 (Georgetown) has seven Members of Parliament. Berbice and West Demerara have three seats each while the Essequibo Region, which is Region 2, has two seats. In addition to regional seats to the Parliament, each region has its own administration and a number of seats for each region, somewhat like our Local Government system. Whichever party wins a majority of votes receives a majority of seats and as such, controls the administration of the region. The regional MPs are distributed based on votes won. The party that wins the most votes gets at least one seat and the other seats for the regions are divided based on votes.
In last Monday's election, out of a total of 475,496 eligible voters, 346,717 votes had been cast reflecting a 72.3 per cent voter turnout. The PPP won Regions 1, 2, 5, 6 and 9 while the PNC won majorities in Regions 4 and 10. The other regions are divided in the votes and as such, the parties will have to share governance in Region 4 as occurred after the 2006 elections.
The results of the 2011 elections shows the PPP/C, now led by Donald Ramoutar, winning 32 seats, four less than it had in the last Parliament. The Opposition Partnership For National Unity (APNU) has 26 seats, a gain of four, and the Alliance For Change (AFC) holds seven, a gain of two. The PPP/C amassed a total of 148,976 votes, APNU a total of 116,305, the AFC a total of 31,489 and TUF 781 votes. The PPP/C leads the combined Opposition of APNU/AFCF/TUF by 401 votes but now has a minority government, the first since Guyana achieved self-governance from Britain in 1953 and independence in 1966. The PPP had won convincingly in the 1992, 1997, 2001, and 2006 elections after the PNC had dominated between 1968 and 1992.
Compromise or new elections?
So what do these results mean for Guyana? It suggests that the PPP/C has won the presidency and the government but would find it difficult to govern without a majority in Parliament. There is a hung Parliament which will require political compromise in a divided nation if the country is to be governed. The President appoints the Cabinet and inherits all the powers stated in the constitution-a position perhaps more powerful than that of the US President and he cannot be questioned in court. But now, both opposition parties are demanding a role in government in exchange for their support.
The new PPP/C Government will not be able to pass bills in the Assembly with 32 seats. The Opposition may even consider passing a no confidence motion and the PPP/C cannot depend on the Opposition because a law passed a few years ago by the PPP/C made it impossible to vote against one's party's wishes. So it will be impossible for anyone in the Opposition to support the PPP/C unless there is an agreement between the PPP/C and one of the parties before a vote is taken. The Government could lose the vote of no confidence leading to the formation of another government under the presidency of Donald Ramoutar who has been elected President. The President can also dissolve Parliament anytime and call an election.
According to the Constitution, the President and the Cabinet shall resign if the Government is defeated by the vote of a majority of all the elected members of the National Assembly on a vote of no confidence. Then, the Government shall remain in office and hold an election within three months. The Government would then resign after the new President takes the oath of office following the election. The possibility of a new election looms in the not too distant future as politicians in our region have hardly displayed the maturity necessary for collaboration and compromise. Besides, the ethnic cleavages run long and deep in Guyana, even with a history of racial violence. The PPP/C finds itself in a precarious situation as another election may yield similar results.
It now has to reflect on why it lost and how to recapture voters who defected to the other parties, particularly the AFC which made inroads into traditional PPP/C territory. Understanding such defection may hold the key to explaining the PPP/C's declining support in the 2011 polls.
Dr Indira Rampersad is a Lecturer in Political Science/International Relations, Dep't of Behavioural Sciences, UWI, St Augustine.
