Security in the Caribbean must mean more to citizens/residents than merely having police track down criminals after they have committed crimes. Governments, institutions and people have to evolve a society in which all citizens have available to them opportunities to achieve their full human potential in a more egalitarian and people-centred society. It is in such an environment real human security will be achieved. It is a vital reconstruction of Caribbean society that the first Caribbean Human Development Report 2012 of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) is attempting to promote.
In such a re-engineered society, according to the vision of the UNDP report, a frontal assault must be made on a number of the drivers of crime. Such causal factors of crime outlined include unemployment, social displacement, inequality, the blocking out of young people of the lower social and economic classes from the mainstream of society, and the absence of a focus on real human development requirements such as health and education.
The unsaid quest of the report is for an elimination/transformation of the ghettoes of human underdevelopment and degradation in western Kingston, old Port-of-Spain, Castries, Georgetown and other urban centres across the Dutch and English-speaking Caribbean-that incidentally is a severely restricted geopolitical re-drawing of the Caribbean Basin, perhaps based on UNDP's responsibility. The reality is that the criminal culture and the organisations which trade in crime stretch across language and national boundaries.
Organised criminality, the youth gang culture and entrenched violence against women, sexual and physical beatings to instill fear and control in domestic situations, stories of which are displayed every day in the media, are found by the researchers to be the three areas in which violence is entrenched in the seven countries surveyed. The survey had 11,000 respondents with over 450 experts being consulted by the UNDP team, making the report one based on evidence and expert regional opinion.
And while Caribbean people who have been negatively affected by criminal activities over the last 25 years need little convincing about the widespread and negative rampage of crime through the region, the report establishes the deep presence of criminal activities in the region with good quality data and examples. The recommendations as to what is to be done follow the path of the criminal upsurge. However, the report attempts to search for answers outside of the typically violent and repressive measures now used throughout the region.
"Social, economic and political empowerment of women and other vulnerable groups to counter the decades of deprivation among these groups caused by poverty and social, cultural political institutional practices" is one way forward promoted by the report. The removal of firearms, preferably by public burning to make a point; the protection of vulnerable communities; the review of current legislation to eliminate legal provisions that tend to discriminate against indigenous people and sexual minorities; long-term efforts to promote awareness of and respect for human rights; programmes to promote pro-social behaviours by youth; the promotion of family stability; alter- native forms of punishment than incarceration of youth; improvement of training facilities for Caribbean police services; research into the causes of street gangs and organised crime, and transformation of the police services and reform of the criminal justice system, inclusive of a regional witness protection and institutional cooperation across Caricom, are all identified as major approaches to countering crime.
As acknowledged by the report, a number of the recommendations have been talked about, even implemented in part, but the need now is for a major push to institute these and other measures identified through evidence-based research. The recommendations make sense. In a number of instances they go beyond simply throwing deviants and perpetrators in jail to rot and/or to understudy hardened criminals, to approaches that are preventive and reformist in nature. Then there are those which seek to understand causes and how to change the relationship between those marginalised segments of society and those who benefit from the imbalance and gain privileges from the system.
As the report urges, no one set of solutions will suit the absolute needs of communities ranging among Paramaribo, St Johns, Kingstown and elsewhere. So what is necessary is for Caricom as a group and individual societies, assisted by the work already done, to adopt the pattern of an evidence-based approach to making policies to counter their problems. That the lead author of the document (Prof Anthony Harriot) and a number of the researchers and consultants are from the Carib-bean is a major advance on the region forever looking outside of itself for solutions.
However, the fundamental difficulty of evolving the structural transformation required to facilitate change is that it is the political culture, economic and social structures which created the problems in the first place. Deepening political democracy, rooting out corruption from the core of political, economic and social structures of governance in the Caribbean require major change. Political parties, legislatures and executive systems functioning everywhere in the Caribbean are inherently archaic/colonial, unresponsive to people participation and provide the structure for the problems identified to thrive. Economic and social class systems and structures marginalise the vast majority of people in the middle and lower levels of societies while distributing rewards to those at the upper levels.
But as the regional director of UNDP for Latin America and the Caribbean, Heraldo Munoz, rightly said at the news conference to launch the report, there are spaces and places on the margins which can be changed by people and their non-governmental organisations. We must all catch a glimpse of what is possible. As this column has said on several occasions over many years, when people stop allowing themselves to become election fodder for parties through five-second, finger-dipping democracy, when they force parties to begin serious discussion of issues facing them, when they get away from messianic ideologies that have them worship at the feet of their leaders, only then will there be meaningful change.
Nonetheless the UNDP report with its transforming approach has relevance; people and grass-roots organisations have to start the process of change. It is completely illogical to expect politicians and the upper economic and social classes to give up their positions of domination and deference.
