You are here

Seven deadly sins of Caribbean culture

Published: 
Sunday, November 18, 2012
President of The Cropper Foundation, Angela Cropper.

Excerpts from the feature address delivered by Angela Cropper to Humanities and Education graduating students at the University of the West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad, 2007.

 

I have been asked to speak on the topic Our Students: Creators and Custodians of our Culture. I have also been very helpfully supplied by the faculty with a quotation from the work of cultural anthropologist Margaret Mead for preparation of my address: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.”

 

Happily, I am very familiar with this quotation and with Dr Mead’s work: I have myself used that very quotation to motivate an International Conference on Development as if Equity Mattered, which was organised by the Cropper Foundation in September 2001.

 

 

I often use this quotation for motivating myself and others; and I hope that you, graduating students and prize winners, will also use it in that way, especially if you are disposed to give some further thought to what I will lay at your feet this evening.

 

The concept of creators and custodians of our culture is not only intriguing, it is complex, wide-ranging, potentially far-reaching, and certainly demanding. It is also fundamental to the future of Trinidad and Tobago and Caribbean society, and to the way in which we contribute to, and engage with, the global civilisation of which we are a part.

 

 

For the concept implies that we can create and sustain the kind of culture we wish to have. It is an active proposition. It implies conscious choice and commitment.

 

We know that the concept of culture is understood at different levels. Perhaps the most ready and popular view of culture is as the performing arts. Culture is also understood as the amalgam of customs, rituals, festival, festivities and other forms of expression by which a group or society comes to be recognised and distinguished from others.

 

 

Understood in this way, our culture reveals a diversity of origins, rituals and customs that underpin the way we are and the way we live and relate to others and the world around us. These manifestations make us recognisably different from others, whether as groups within societies or between societies: You are, therefore I am (Title of book by Satish Kumar). Culture is also understood as the body of intellectual achievements of a particular time or people.

 

But this evening I want to look at culture as a way of being—an accumulation of attitudes, values and behaviour, that may have both destructive and affirmative facets, and which may be passed on from generation to generation.

 

 

I take my bearings here from the work of the United Nations World Commission on Culture and Development which in its report of 2002 held out the view of culture as ‘the last frontier of development’, and discussed culture as “the set of distinctive spiritual, material, intellectual and emotional features of society or a social group, and that it encompasses, in addition to art and literature, lifestyles, ways of living together, value systems, traditions and beliefs.”

 

With that in mind, I intend this evening to try and crystallise what may be some facets of our way of being in Trinidad and Tobago and the Caribbean as a whole, facets which I think all groups manifest, irrespective of their origins and the rituals and forms of expression by which they are distinguished one from the other. Some of these facets have been with us for a long time, others are emergent (becoming apparent).

 

These are perhaps characteristics of our Caribbean culture which unify us—more than those things to which we often lay claim—though they may be present to different degrees in the various societies. In the short time I have I can only draw these out and leave you to examine them further in the course of your work as creators and custodians of our culture. And after your own analysis I would be happy if I am proved to be wrong about any of them.

 

Culture of materialism
The first facet that I want to draw out is our emergent culture of materialism. This seems to be our dominant ethic, not limited to the Caribbean, of course. It may be that we are led along in this by others, and not having the confidence to formulate and position our own world view in contradistinction, we allow this to become a dominant facet of our own culture, willingly adopted, not resisted.

 

Our capitulation is reinforced by official endorsement that the monetary value of the product we generate is the ultimate measure of our progress and achievement and development as societies. This measure is the dominant one in Trinidad and Tobago’s 20/20 Vision.

 

 

Here, that is in T&T, we have become part of the extractive mindset of the industrial order, with no concern about sustainability, and little regard for inter-generational equity. We are scornful of the notion that humanity must harmonise its demands with Earth’s capacities. And our materialism is leading us to become disconnected from our physical place and from one another.

 

Culture of individualism
Then I want to draw attention to our culture of individualism. Each person for herself; “me” at the expense of the “other”, breakdown of the authority and stability of family, school, community; and scant regard for the value of those relationships for creating and sustaining the social order.
 

 

Culture of civic complacency
Third, our culture of civic complacency is evident in so many ways, perhaps because of our preoccupation with material progress, compounded by the culture of individualism. We take laissez-faire into new realms. What are the implications of this for our culture of democracy?

 

 

I hasten to put in the balance here that Caribbean societies seem to have the ability to occasionally rise out of a complacent stupor and say enough is enough. We do have that capacity to rise up as a body politic and let our voice be heard, and to rescue ourselves from our five-yearly caricature of democracy, but we do not often bestir ourselves to do so. There are, however, some blocks upon which to build a new culture of Caribbean citizenship.

 

Culture of violence
Fourth is our culture of violence, which is emerging as a dominant characteristic throughout the Caribbean. Violence has been a longstanding aspect of political, family and gender relations in the Caribbean; but it is now becoming the routine means for dealing with even inconsequential conflicts; it is the tool of the culture of materialism, and it is fuelling a culture of criminality.
 

Culture of corruption
Fifth is the culture of corruption. In Trinidad and Tobago we take pride in finding loopholes or getting around regulations, or evading the law. The longstanding perception of the “Trickidadian” by our Caribbean compatriots is not without some basis.

 

 

This facet of our culture reveals itself in some national gems: “no damn dog bark”; “all ah we tief”; “politics has its own morality”. These statements have become emblematic. No doubt they have their equivalent in other Caribbean countries.
 

 

Culture of half-arsed-ness
And then there is the Caribbean tendency to do only as little as would get us by; to go for cosmetic rather than fundamental changes; and though we make many claims, it is perhaps only in the Arts and Sports that we can be said to have manifested a culture of excellence.

 

 

As an example of this I invite you to look at our attempt to make the city of Port-of-Spain user-friendly to Spanish speaking visitors, as part of the campaign to woo the Headquarters of the Free Trade Area of the Americas: you will see that some street signs have been rendered in Spanish, but they are very few and limited in range.

 

 

I had to coin a word to describe this tendency. It’s not in the literature. I call it the culture of half- arsed-ness. I think we can find examples of this throughout the Caribbean.

 

Culture of nihilism
The above facets all seem to accumulate towards an absence of feelings, of value for non-material aspects of life and relationships; a disregard for moral principles; and absence of soul. And I wonder if we are not seeing the setting in of a culture of nihilism.

 

 

Just when we need a culture of caring, a culture of compassion; just when we need to regain relationships of family and community as pathways to healing; just when we need to reinstate a foundation of moral principles to guide personal, public and political behaviour.

 

To the students: I am sure that you would not want to be custodians of facets of our culture such as those that I have suggested. But if you are also creators of our culture, what might be the nature of your contribution to examination and displacement of these facets, and to cultivation of different values and patterns in our societies, that would at the same time help us overcome the disharmony, disintegration, and dysfunction that we see around us?

 

You will have a big responsibility to decide which of our cultural attributes are worthy of being sustained. This selection process will have to be predicated on some framework of values, in the larger context of the character of Caribbean society that we might work towards, as well as the character of the global civilisation to which we would want to contribute.
 

 

Angela Cropper,
President, The Cropper Foundation

 

http://www.normangirvan.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/cropper-seven-de...