To contradict Henry Ford, the man I hold directly responsible for every traffic jam in the world, history and herstory, far from being bunk, are presents and presences from the past, the past in present tense and gifts of and for the future because "time present and time past are both contained in time future."
So at the end of the longest weekend of the year, while you are all recuperating from celebrating a fairly recent arrival or the departure, return and everlasting presence of Jesus Christ, I want to take a turn into the real and fabricated past before all the evidence goes up in smoke, is declared inadmissible, inaccessible or simply vanishes.
We're not discussing e-gate here, although today's billet d'humeur is concerned with a text from the past in which we'll find many resonances of our present state of the nation. Many will be familiar with the18th-century English playwright John Gay's The Beggar's Opera, written in 1728 on the threshold of the Caribbean's "eruption into modernity." Those who don't know Gay's original may have come across the 20th-century reworking of this classic, The Threepenny Opera, by Bertolt Brecht.
Gay's prototype introduced a new dramatic form–the ballad opera–which for those of you who recognise your kaiso past and heritage, reads much like the calypso dramas of the Golden Era.Besides its immediately popular form there are other elements in The Beggar's Opera which we in the Trinidad of 2013 will identify with: "caustic political satire...and a story of crime and betrayal set in the urban underworld of prostitutes and thieves."
But it is Polly, the sequel to the Opera, banned during Gay's lifetime and recently republished in the Oxford World's Classics series, that I want to focus on here, as Polly is set in the West Indies. Like a foreshadowing of Pirates of the Caribbean, but with a set of carnivorous satirical teeth substituting for special effects and cameos by rock'n'roll skeletons like Keith Richards, Polly gives us a reading of our region which won't be found in tourist brochures or guidebooks.
As the blurb says far more succinctly than I'm able on just one cup of coffee: "With a cross-dressing heroine and a cast of female adventurers, pirates, Indian princes, rebel slaves, and rapacious landowners, Polly lays bare a culture in which all human relationships are reduced to commercial transactions."
It's interesting, especially for those who reject history, and can only go back as far as their memory allows, to note that the commercialisation and commodification of the human condition are not simply manifestations of capitalism or more recent globalisation.
As we can see quite clearly though all the smokescreens, greed (rather than governance) and everything it is prepared to do to satiate the insatiable, is one of the base motivators for virtually any manmade system and its attendant infrastructure, whether the system is political, religious, educational or cultural. Isn't this precisely what we are referring to when we speak so blithely in our new-found cynicism (pragmatism?) of our "Eat ah food" political culture?
But to get back to Polly, just as kaiso has fallen foul of the censor along with many kanaval songs in Haiti, Gay's script was banned from the stage by Walpole, the English prime minister of the time, because of the political challenge it posed, so paper trails or their postmodern cyber-counterparts are nothing if not old hat.
Polly relocates the action of the Opera from Newgate prison to a Caribbean island populated by colonisers, slaves, deportees like Polly's husband, highwayman Macheath (who switches identity to become ex-slave Morano) and (Amer)Indians. Like other European texts (Shakespeare's Tempest, Southerne's Oroonoko, Swift's Gulliver's Travels) Polly presents the confrontation between colonisers and colonised as a platform to satirise European values. In so doing the setting allows, even if indirectly, for an examination of such issues as racial difference, the slave trade and colonial exploitation.
If the highwayman of the Opera represents a "figure of the free play of desire," then the pirates of Polly stand as New World counterparts–more romantic rebels. But it is only Polly herself, in male drag, who lives up to the brave romantic ideal. Her fellow all-male seadogs, are as cowardly, corrupt and conflicted as the colonisers and even the Amerindians, who, far from being idealised noble savages, are also implicated in a global system of corruption when they hunt down runaway slaves on behalf of their European allies.
Revisiting the past as we've just done, even if it is a past constructed through text, memory, myth and legend we might view the present state of affairs in T&T as same ol', same ol'. But while we should be alert to human concupiscence, practised regardless of race, gender, or any other category, we shouldn't forget that ultimately we have choices and need not surrender to the tide of exploitation, or the greed and corruption it engenders
