When Ali Green* and her husband, Craig*, met, she was a recent grad earning $28,000 a year as a newspaper columnist, and he was a chef pulling in $50,000.
You are here
AG’s office: Maharaj misleading the public
Statement from counsel of the Attorney General in response to the July 27, Sunday Guardian opinion article: ‘AG restricts citizens’ access to High Court’ by Ramesh Lawrence Maharaj.
Counsel appearing for the Attorney General in the hereinafter mentioned matter, Avory Sinanan SC, Donna Prowell and Richard Jagai, have read with deep concern an article published in the Sunday Guardian of July 27 under the rubric: ‘AG restricts citizens’ access to High Court’ under the byline of Ramesh Lawrence Maharaj, SC, in which the author seeks to report and comment upon the decision made by the Honourable Justice Robin Mohammed on July 22, in High Court action CV 2014-01240 John Reginald Phelps Dumas versus the Attorney General.
Counsel representing the Attorney General have formed the view that the said article does not convey an accurate impression of the points articulated on behalf of the Attorney General and the basis therefore or the facts, matters and circumstances considered by the Honourable Justice Mohammed in arriving at his decision. Counsel accordingly feels compelled to correct the misinformation placed in the public domain and referes to the following matters:
• The putative author, a former attorney general who should be familiar with the function of the Office of the Attorney General in dealing with matters such as this, failed to disclose to the public that he was lead counsel appearing on behalf of the unsuccessful claimant.
Avory Sinanan, SC
(Counsel for the Attorney General)
User comments posted on this website are the sole views and opinions of the comment writer and are not representative of Guardian Media Limited or its staff.
Guardian Media Limited accepts no liability and will not be held accountable for user comments.
Guardian Media Limited reserves the right to remove, to edit or to censor any comments.
Any content which is considered unsuitable, unlawful or offensive, includes personal details, advertises or promotes products, services or websites or repeats previous comments will be removed.