JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, July 18, 2025

Cooking The Books

by

20140907

When he de­liv­ers his last bud­get speech to­mor­row, Fi­nance Min­is­ter Lar­ry Howai is like­ly to have much to boast about. Un­em­ploy­ment, for ex­am­ple, reached 3.75 per cent over the last fis­cal year and sat­is­fied the po­lit­i­cal, if not the eco­nom­ic de­f­i­n­i­tion of full em­ploy­ment. Eco­nom­ic growth, pro­ject­ed at two per cent, is in line with some of the ma­jor economies in the world, al­though it has us in ninth place in the Cari­com re­gion.

The nom­i­nal ex­change rate has sta­bilised at a po­lit­i­cal­ly ac­cept­able lev­el of ap­prox­i­mate­ly TT$6.44 to the US dol­lar and the bud­get deficit has been dra­mat­i­cal­ly re­duced, which might even sug­gest the at­tain­ment of a bal­anced bud­get ahead of the min­is­ter's pre­dic­tion of 2016.

The min­is­ter is al­so like­ly to boast that in­fla­tion, as a re­sult of the car­ing poli­cies of the PP ad­min­is­tra­tion, is at the low­est lev­el for some time, with head­line in­fla­tion now at just over two per cent. T&T, he is like­ly to say, is now poised for eco­nom­ic take-off.

Don't be­lieve a word of it. Un­for­tu­nate­ly for the min­is­ter, to­mor­row's bud­get pre­sen­ta­tion is be­ing de­liv­ered fol­low­ing last week's pub­li­ca­tion of the In­ter­na­tion­al Mon­e­tary Fund Ar­ti­cle IV Con­sul­ta­tion Re­port on the T&T econ­o­my fol­low­ing its last vis­it which end­ed in June 2014.

Through­out the re­port, the IMF econ­o­mists ex­pressed their con­cern over the re­li­a­bil­i­ty of the da­ta from T&T. For some in­ex­plic­a­ble rea­son, the Min­istry of Plan­ning has al­lowed the Cen­tral Sta­tis­ti­cal Of­fice to com­plete­ly col­lapse, so that it is now in­ca­pable of pro­vid­ing re­li­able eco­nom­ic sta­tis­tics to guide fis­cal plan­ning and projects. The ab­sence of da­ta meant the IMF was forced to make pro­jec­tions based on num­bers on which it could not tru­ly re­ly. And the num­bers which it did have did not mean what they sug­gest­ed.

The Min­is­ter of Fi­nance is like­ly to boast, for ex­am­ple, that he has been able to sig­nif­i­cant­ly re­duce the bud­get deficit as a re­sult of greater-than-ex­pect­ed rev­enue re­ceipts and the pru­dent fis­cal man­age­ment em­ployed un­der his tenure. The IMF warns, how­ev­er, that the im­proved rev­enue re­ceipts are part­ly due to im­prove­ments in the non-en­er­gy sec­tor, but are al­so due to "ad hoc" in­ter­ven­tions by state en­ter­pris­es which are pay­ing huge div­i­dends to the Cor­po­ra­tion Sole to boost its fis­cal out­come.

"While the Gov­ern­ment should reap re­wards from its own­er­ship of prof­itable en­ter­pris­es," the IMF not­ed, "staff cau­tioned that ex­cess re­liance on such div­i­dends could, in the long run, un­der­mine com­pa­ny fi­nances."And in the most telling para­graph of the re­port, it con­clud­ed by stat­ing: "Staff wel­comed the au­thor­i­ties' in­ten­tion to main­tain dis­ci­pline on cur­rent spend­ing in the run-up to the 2015 elec­tions."

The Gov­ern­ment's fis­cal po­si­tion was strength­ened last year by the First Cit­i­zens IPO which net­ted $1.05 bil­lion and this year the Fund notes: "Div­i­dends from non-fi­nan­cial SOE (State Owned En­ter­pris­es), ex­clud­ing the Na­tion­al Lot­ter­ies, al­ready to­talled one and three-quar­ter per cent of GDP in the first quar­ter of FY 2013/14, com­pared to 0.8 per cent of GDP bud­get­ed for the whole fis­cal year. This in­cludes a div­i­dend from Na­tion­al Gas Com­pa­ny equiv­a­lent to three-quar­ter per cent of GDP."

It may even be tempt­ing to be­lieve that the fis­cal per­for­mance has been so great that it is a good thing we avoid­ed Patrick Man­ning's Prop­er­ty Tax. Well, not re­al­ly. The Fi­nance Min­is­ter has gone ahead and qui­et­ly im­ple­ment­ed the Prop­er­ty Tax. The first phase, orig­i­nal­ly in­tend­ed to be­gin in June this year, will tar­get busi­ness and com­mer­cial en­ter­pris­es and work is al­ready pro­ceed­ing apace ac­cord­ing to the as­sur­ances giv­en to the IMF. The third phase, which tar­gets house­hold­ers, will not kick in un­til 2016, af­ter the gen­er­al elec­tion, and will help the min­is­ter ful­fil his promise to bal­ance the bud­get.

The bud­get is an ex­er­cise in pol­i­tics as well as eco­nom­ics and both need to be bal­anced well if the coun­try is to grow while avoid­ing the so­cial up­heavals that have seen some of the best laid eco­nom­ic plans come to naught. As a fi­nance min­is­ter, Howai has per­haps done a good job in at­tempt­ing to keep the eco­nom­ic fun­da­men­tals in line while pleas­ing the re­al politi­cians at whose be­hest he serves.

The prob­lem is, he re­mains by na­ture a bank­ing CEO. The fi­nan­cial world is re­plete with ex­am­ples of CEOs who earned huge bonus­es from their firms ($11.5 mil­lion is a drop in the buck­et) by en­sur­ing they met and sur­passed every key per­for­mance in­di­ca­tor (KPI) dur­ing their tenure, on­ly for the en­ter­pris­es to crash fol­low­ing their well-timed de­par­ture.

On the face of it, most of the KPIs Howai will an­nounce to­mor­row will sug­gest that we are on the cusp of eco­nom­ic take off. But there will be no mean­ing­ful at­tempt to deal with the most press­ing bud­getary is­sues–like the $5 bil­lion fu­el sub­sidy or the fact that more than 50 per cent of the bud­get is con­sumed by trans­fers and sub­si­dies.

The re­al­i­ty is: un­less there is a dra­mat­ic in­ter­ven­tion, we are head­ed for a slow de­cline as our en­er­gy sec­tor rev­enue con­tin­ues to evap­o­rate and the non-en­er­gy sec­tor strug­gles to com­pete ex­tra-re­gion­al­ly to com­pen­sate for the short­fall.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored