Despite the war of words between Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley and the Oilfields Workers’ Trade Union (OWTU) president general Ancel Roget, the two are scheduled to meet this Tuesday to discuss...
You are here
In defence of Mr Manning, PNM
The time has come to correct gross inaccuracies pertaining to the widespread claim that former Prime Minister of Trinidad and Tobago and also former political leader of the People’s National Movement (PNM) Mr Patrick Manning had coined the phrase “community leaders.”
I also want to condemn those elements in the media who link the phrase “community leaders” and Mr Manning’s meeting with so-called gang leaders as “PNM harbouring criminals.”
Undisputed facts will clearly demonstrate that it was United National Congress (UNC) under the leadership of Mr Basdeo Panday that coined the phrase “community leaders” when known gang leader, the late Sean Francis, contested the July 12th, 1999 Local Government Elections on a UNC ticket.
Given Francis’ known background in the criminal world and considering the fact that he was a person of interest to the police, the media queried if his candidacy would have had a negative effect on his party.
Mr Panday was unmoved and indicated to the media that everybody deserves a second chance and he further described Francis as a community leader.
Francis contested the San Juan/Caledonia seat for the UNC and lost to the PNM’s Harvey Borris.
I was taken aback when radio and television hosts on their morning programmes recently accused the PNM of harbouring criminals because of the meeting between Mr Manning and the so-called gang leaders.
I would like to ask these commentators: which approach constitutes harbouring criminals (a) trying to make peace among warring gangs, or (b) giving known gang leaders an opportunity to be part of the governance of the country?
It is to be noted that Mr Manning was not alone in trying to bring peace in the Laventille/Morvant communities.
Several efforts were made by NGOs, individuals and even Father Clyde Harvey, who organised peace marches, signing of treaties among gangs and meetings with so-called leaders aimed at curbing the violence in the districts.
So attributing these statements to Mr Manning and the PNM is grossly inaccurate.
It is not the only time when certain elements in the media and other individuals made unjustified claims against the PNM.
People actually took the oath to speak the truth before the Commission of Inquiry into the 1990 events and told deliberate lies.
They claimed that Mr Manning, then Opposition Leader and the PNM, never condemned the attempted coup.
In response to that claim, I submitted newspaper clippings to the commissioners providing proof that Mr Manning and Dr Lenny Saith, then chairman of the PNM, condemned the coup on at least three occasions.
I don’t know why some elements in the media insist on putting a spin, twisting the facts or attempting to rewrite the history of T&T when it comes to the PNM and national issues.
Only recently the UNC did not support the Government in Parliament on the Anti-Gang legislation despite the fact that when they were in government and presented the same legislation the PNM did not hesitate in supporting it.
It, therefore, becomes imperative for me to protect the legacy of the PNM and also to ensure that the work of the party in developing our beloved country is properly recorded.
In the circumstances, I would like the people who have been misleading the country for the past few days and casting aspirations on Mr Manning and the PNM on the crime problem to apologise to his family and the PNM as a whole.
ASHTON FORD is a former
general secretary of the PNM.
User comments posted on this website are the sole views and opinions of the comment writer and are not representative of Guardian Media Limited or its staff.
Guardian Media Limited accepts no liability and will not be held accountable for user comments.
Guardian Media Limited reserves the right to remove, to edit or to censor any comments.
Any content which is considered unsuitable, unlawful or offensive, includes personal details, advertises or promotes products, services or websites or repeats previous comments will be removed.
User profiles registered through fake social media accounts may be deleted without notice.