On Saturday, members of the United National Congress (UNC) will vote in an internal election for 17 posts on the party's national executive. The UNC, like its coalition partner the Congress of the People (COP), chooses its leaders by the one-man-one-vote method. All of the approximately 25,000 people on the party's membership list are entitled to cast their ballots for their preferred candidates. Voting will take place at centres across the country and, according to the party's election officials, results will be released within hours of the close of polls. The UNC should be applauded for adopting this system. Carrying out leadership elections in the full glare of public scrutiny facilitates the accountability and transparency that are so important for a healthy democratic system. By moving away from secret leadership nomination and selection procedures, the UNC-and all the other parties in this country that have adopted the system-have made a significant step toward the democratic maturity that is so vital for advancement as a nation.
One man, one vote means that rank-and-file members of the party not only have the opportunity to vote in a healthy and open electoral process, but can offer themselves as candidates, as is the case with this internal election.
This is important because the men and women who will be elected to the UNC's national executive will be well positioned to take on more significant leadership roles-as MPs, councillors and chairs of statutory agencies and state boards. Once these candidates are willing to conform with a system that is subject to widespread scrutiny, the ones with the right mix of skills, qualifications, experience and determination have a good chance of being recognised and chosen. One example of how that more open system works is Kamla Persad-Bissessar. On the basis of one man, one vote, on January 24, 2010, she was elected the new leader of the UNC, getting an overwhelming 13,932 votes over the 1,359 cast for her closest rival, party founder Basdeo Panday. This put her in a strong position when a snap general election was called a few months later, on May 24, 2010. The newly elected UNC leader took the helm of the political coalition that became the People's Partnership and was elected prime minister.
Last July, the COP's estimated 38,000 members were all entitled to vote for a new leader in that party's internal election. It was a four-way race which saw Prakash Ramadhar emerge victorious from a field that included Sports Minister Anil Roberts, attorney Vernon De Lima and animal-rights activist Nalini Dial. From all indications, the tide may be turning even within this country's oldest political party, the People's National Movement, which has maintained the traditional delegate system throughout its more than five decades of existence. However, just a year ago one of its members, Jennifer Baptiste-Primus, proposed that the party should consider the one-man-one-vote method. It met with some opposition, but several in the party's central executive agreed that all party groups should be consulted on the matter before a final decision is made. For now, however, the focus is on the leadership race within the UNC. There are 65 candidates, including several incumbents, currently on the hustings. Very much as in a national election, candidates have hit the campaign trail with public meetings. Several have published manifestos, and the more innovative are taking advantage of social-networking sites to woo voters. There have been a few rough patches, some disagreements and, of course, controversies-but that is how democracy works. On Saturday, eligible UNC members will be free to vote for the candidates they believe are best suited to serve on the party's national executive. At the end of the process, may the best men and women win in an election that is free and fair.
