On Thursday in Tobago, Minister of Housing, Land and Marine Affairs, Dr Roodal Moonilal, announced the Government's intention to follow through with its Land for the Landless programme, first announced in May. Describing it as an opportunity for deserving low-income earners to qualify for residential lots, he also noted that the project would seek to regularise squatting communities.
The spirit of the announcement is commendable and offers hope to marginal families that they might be able to own land and build a home. But Minister Moonilal who has weathered some of the more troubling aspects of the Government's emphasis on improving the lot of marginal citizens, should have learned by now to be more cautious in making such bold announcements.
Efforts at regularising land use at Bois Bande, Sangre Grande and La Pastora Village, Lopinot led to aggressive confrontations between farmers who have been working these lands and thugs who have taken to boldly staking claim on parcels of these lands in anticipation of a regularisation process that might also favour them.
By announcing a fresh effort at regularising squatters, the Housing Minister is again tempting fate for those holding letters of comfort to their lands or hoping that long term occupancy and value-added land use would add to the legitimacy of their claims to the lands they have been working on.
A better strategy might have been to study the patterns of land use in the areas targeted by the programme, which include Guayaguayare, Gran Couva, Cocorite, Valencia, Moruga, Arouca, Point Fortin, River Estate, Princes Town, Matura, Williamsville and Caratal.
An updated map of the existing squatting population, evaluation of their impact on the environment and identification of viable farming lands might provide the basis for a clearly thought through strategic plan for turning State lands into communities and villages populated by landowners with a vested interest in improving their standard of living.
For far too long, the standard method of handling squatting has been either driving people away with a backhoe or pliably handing over the lands with no strategy beyond the political advantage attendant on such decision making. That vie-ki-vie approach has led to a sense of entitlement among illegal squatters, lands suited to agriculture being used for housing and a dangerous absence of civic planning in the construction and growth of these ad hoc communities.
In June, WASA announced that there were 691 squatters occupying lands sited on top of its mains systems and water resources. In May, flipping the script on squatters to threats, Minister Moonilal warned that the growth in squatter sites from 251 to 326 over the last 14 years might indicate that as many as 25 percent of the population might be squatting and that there would be moves to clamp down on illegal squatting.
Later that month, the Housing Minister appealed to people receiving certificates of comfort to former squatters to not turn their communities into ghettos, urging them not to harbour criminals. By June, the Government was moving to bring legislation that would bring more robust penalties, including fines and jail terms to persons found guilty of squatting.
There must be a thread of logic that Minister Moonilal is following through this dance back and forth across the line of law governing squatting, but he needs to make his strategy clearer to squatters who must be unsure about what, exactly, the Government's position is on the problem.
What's clear is that there needs to be a sensible and transparently articulated plan for managing not just the ownership, but the use of State lands that makes sense and proper planning of the squatter settlements that the Government chooses to regularise.
