JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, July 26, 2025

Brinkmanship serves no useful purpose

by

20170107

Giv­en the high stakes that were rid­ing on it, Fri­day's de­ci­sion by the Gov­ern­ment to con­cede to the de­mands of the Op­po­si­tion to hold a joint se­lect com­mit­tee meet­ing to analyse the Tax In­for­ma­tion Ex­change Agree­ments bill is most wel­come.

That bill is the cru­cial piece of the jig­saw puz­zle that could even­tu­al­ly lead to T&T ful­fill­ing its com­mit­ment to the US gov­ern­ment to pass the leg­is­la­tion that paves the way for the im­ple­men­ta­tion of the For­eign Ac­count Tax Com­pli­ance Act (FAT­CA).

While the gov­ern­ment is to be con­grat­u­lat­ed for its con­ces­sion, some se­ri­ous ques­tions still need to be asked with re­gard to the think­ing that dri­ves the peo­ple who lead this coun­try at this time of in­creas­ing eco­nom­ic, so­cial and in­dus­tri­al re­la­tions prob­lems.

Cer­tain things are clear with re­gard to the FAT­CA leg­is­la­tion:

n It re­quires a spe­cial three-fifths ma­jor­i­ty in both hous­es of par­lia­ment be­cause the Tax In­for­ma­tion Ex­change Agree­ments bill con­tains claus­es that are in­con­sis­tent with the fun­da­men­tal rights and free­doms guar­an­teed by sec­tions 4 and 5 of the Con­sti­tu­tion of T&T;

n The Gov­ern­ment does not now have a three-fifths ma­jor­i­ty in ei­ther leg­is­la­ture. That means pas­sage of the leg­is­la­tion re­quires the co­op­er­a­tion of the op­po­si­tion in the low­er house and the co­op­er­a­tion of three non-gov­ern­ment Sen­a­tors;

n Back in Sep­tem­ber, the Op­po­si­tion made it clear that its sup­port was con­tin­gent on the Gov­ern­ment agree­ing to a joint se­lect com­mit­tee.

Against that back­ground–and giv­en the im­por­tance to the coun­try's bank­ing and pay­ment sys­tems–clear­ly the speech Min­is­ter of Fi­nance Colm Im­bert de­liv­ered on Fri­day should have been de­liv­ered four months ago.

Even if he con­sid­ered that the Op­po­si­tion's de­mands amount­ed to black­mail and hold­ing the coun­try to ran­som, Mr Im­bert should have been very clear in his mind that the leg­is­la­tion needs the sup­port of the "oth­er side" to be passed.

That cal­cu­la­tion alone should have in­di­cat­ed to him that that was one bat­tle that he was not go­ing to win, no mat­ter how much he huffed and puffed and threat­ened to blow down the Unit­ed Na­tion­al Con­gress's house–wher­ev­er it is now lo­cat­ed now.

In the cir­cum­stances, a gra­cious con­ces­sion to the Op­po­si­tion's de­mands four months ago would have saved T&T from the histri­on­ics and brinkman­ship that cer­tain­ly do not be­come a po­lit­i­cal par­ty that has gov­erned T&T for as many years as the Peo­ple's Na­tion­al Move­ment or a fi­nance min­is­ter with as much par­lia­men­tary ex­pe­ri­ence as Mr Im­bert.

One of dan­gers of brinkman­ship is that some­times peo­ple fall off the edge. And while Mr Im­bert was smart enough to pull the coun­try back from the edge in the FAT­CA mat­ter, it seems the Gov­ern­ment wants to take the coun­try back to the brink with re­gard to the Petrotrin strike.

With just hours to go be­fore thou­sands of work­ers down tools at the Petrotrin re­fin­ery, the Gov­ern­ment has made no at­tempt to take the is­sue of the first col­lec­tive agree­ment pe­ri­od (2011 to 2015) out of the In­dus­tri­al Court.

In­stead gov­ern­ment spokes­men have stuck stub­born­ly to the script that the sec­ond pe­ri­od (2015 to 2018) can­not be set­tled un­less and un­til the In­dus­tri­al Court has set the bench­mark with a judg­ment for the ear­li­er pe­ri­od.

While say­ing that the is­sue is best left with the In­dus­tri­al Court may seem like a clever ar­gu­ment, clear­ly log­ic dic­tates that an out-of-court of­fer be­fore the strike gets start­ed would save the coun­try a great deal of stress.

The les­son from FAT­CA is that it is bet­ter to con­cede a weak hand ear­ly in a way that seems like a ne­go­ti­a­tion rather than a con­ces­sion, rather than con­tin­u­ing to hold on to the hand and be­ing forced to con­cede.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored