Carl Jacobs was born on Pashley Street, Success Village, Laventille, 63 years ago, and from a child music has been like a source of life to him.
You are here
Lawyer: It’s embarrassing
Astonishing, embarassing. These were some of the words used by former vice-president of the Law Association Hendrickson Seunath SC to describe the acceptance of silk by Chief Justice Ivor Archie and Appeal Court Judge, Justice Wendell Kangaloo, from Attorney General Anand Ramlogan last week. He said yesterday: “What is astonishing and embarassing is sitting judges taking silk. “Once you become a judge you can no longer advocate. Whether the award was given to them or whether they applied, it ought not to have happened.”
Seunath further stated that the giving of silk to the two judges was “well thought out” by those who offered and those who received it. He added: “It was self-serving and has nothing to do with the purpose for which it (silk) was created. “It is embarrassing to the profession and the Judiciary, making non-advocates silk, it was never meant for them. “It is a tradition that goes back to England and was originally reserved for counsel at the Bar, advocates. “It is an honour that is bestowed on those who achieve a certain level of excellence at the Bar.”
Seunath said when he was appointed senior counsel in 1998, there was a committee of silk at the time with Karl Hudson-Phillips QC and Tajmool Hosein QC in charge. “They sat and decided, as heads of the profession, whom they should recommend for silk,” he said. He wondered if the awarding of silk to 15 people, including Archie and Kangaloo, was political. Former PNM House Speaker Barry Sinanan was among those conferred with silk by AG Ramlogan.
User comments posted on this website are the sole views and opinions of the comment writer and are not representative of Guardian Media Limited or its staff.
Guardian Media Limited accepts no liability and will not be held accountable for user comments.
Guardian Media Limited reserves the right to remove, to edit or to censor any comments.
Any content which is considered unsuitable, unlawful or offensive, includes personal details, advertises or promotes products, services or websites or repeats previous comments will be removed.