Even though he suggests in his most recent reflection on the state of the nation that we may wish to revisit the role of the President, Max Richards showed that he more than anyone else understands it. When the PNM under Manning allowed his residence to become dilapidated, he said nothing. The incoming People's Partnership Government did well to leave the post of President unmoved, and he, standing above the fray as usual, went along as asked, serving at the pleasure of the Government.
That he had the confidence of both the winners and the losers of the last election is a testament to his demonstrated ability to be neutral on political matters, and to hold to principles, such as equality and fairness, that are at the bedrock of national life. We are fortunate to have him as, frankly, our moral leader, in these times when so much around us seems tainted, nothing to be taken on its face. Everything so coarse.
In his speech to the Parliament, Richards returned to education, this time to university education, and straight out of the blocks he laid down that from a policy standpoint, UTT must be afforded parity of esteem with UWI. He says this in a climate in which the body language, and concrete actions of the Government, has said otherwise. The focus has been on the Debe branch of UWI.
The chairman of the board of UTT has been on record in one of the daily papers as saying there has been a feeding frenzy at UTT, and the Attorney General has recently sent pre-action protocol letters to Ken Julien and one of his board members.
Since Julien's leaving, three people have acted in the position of president there, and all three have had to step down for one reason or other. To date, two years on from Julien, UTT does not have a confirmed president. It clearly has not been seen by the Government as a high priority.
Max Richards, however, brings up the topic in front of the Parliament, and with the country as audience, saying that our national university needs attention. And he goes further, saying that the national university has to conform to principles we see at UWI, and indeed at universities of repute elsewhere, on questions of the hiring of talent at all levels, and on the critical question of freedom of speech.
Indeed, UTT has been a silent presence in the society, a function of the fact that, unlike UWI, it does not have a system of lifetime tenure. Tenure protects speech. Contract systems promote fear and silence. A university should not hire on the basis of personal preference, Max Richards asserts. But that horse may well have left the barn at UTT. Still, it is reassuring to hear from such a moral height that UTT is worth nurturing, that it is ours, and should be treated not like the proverbial step-child.
At the very least, the Government should try, by looking in the mirror, to work out what is it about its approach to UTT that has prompted the alarm sounded by Richards. Two years on, and the signals from the People's Partnership with respect to the university are mixed and confused. And yet, this is the place where we find those citizens in the middle, the salt of the earth, those who form the very fabric of the society.
UTT is the most dramatic move that this country has ever made towards the democratisation of tertiary education in the country. It is the case that while in opposition, some members of the current Government referred to it as a PNM institution, intended for its supporters. But to the contrary UTT, by the most cursory inspection of the faces of its students, reflects our wonderful diversity.
UTT has been neglected by this Government. And the President is saying that a university is not like any other institution-it cannot be treated as a spoil of the elections. For the sake of the country I hope the Government listens to him. The establishment of UTT is one of our signal achievements since independence.
Theodore Lewis
Professor Emeritus
University of Minnesota
