JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, July 4, 2025

Applause for banning of shrimp trawlers

...now time to reg­u­late seis­mic sur­veys

by

20130906

FFOS and all fish­ery stake­hold­ers are cel­e­brat­ing and danc­ing in joy through­out T&T to­day.Min­is­ter De­vant Ma­haraj must be loud­ly ap­plaud­ed for his courage and vi­sion in ban­ning the pow­er­ful and well-con­nect­ed lob­by of the In­dus­tri­al Shrimp trawlers (Types III and IV), and in­tro­duc­ing a closed sea­son dur­ing breed­ing times for ar­ti­sanal trawlers (Type I, and II) as re­port­ed in the press.

This move is long over­due and has brought tears of re­lief to many of us who have wit­nessed the dev­as­ta­tion caused to our liveli­hoods and our bio-di­ver­si­ty over the past three decades by mis­guid­ed di­rec­tors of fish­eries.On be­half of all right-think­ing fish­ers and cit­i­zens, FFOS un­re­served­ly and whole­heart­ed­ly con­grat­u­lates Min­is­ter De­vant Ma­haraj.

The good min­is­ter must be mind­ful of the many chal­lenges ahead in­clud­ing the wide­spread dis­con­tent en­dorsed by sci­en­tif­ic pa­pers on seis­mic sur­veys which show that they re­sult in dis­place­ment of fish­er­men and fish pop­u­la­tions and neg­a­tive­ly im­pact spawn­ing species dur­ing the sur­vey which will ul­ti­mate­ly re­sult in re­duced catch for the fish­er­folk for an un­known pe­ri­od of time.

Phys­i­cal dam­age is al­so re­port­ed for small­er fish and fish with swim­ming blad­ders. Im­pacts were al­so seen on the egg and lar­vae stages of fish­es. The long-term ef­fect is de­stroy­ing our mem­bers' liveli­hood.

Dis­tur­bance and dis­place­ment of spawn­ing fish from their spawn­ing ar­eas will have an ef­fect on the fu­ture fish pop­u­la­tion.In the past, rec­om­men­da­tions were made (Dalen et al. 1996) which in­clude seis­mic shoot­ing be­ing at a min­i­mum of 50 km from spawn­ing grounds or mi­gra­to­ry paths. What are we wait­ing for?

It is rea­son­able to ex­pect that our fish will re­act the same as Cana­di­an or Brazil­ian fish. There is there­fore no need to du­pli­cate pro­hib­i­tive­ly ex­pen­sive stud­ies done else­where.T&T re­quire the same best prac­tice which Cana­da and the USA have adopt­ed. Any­thing short of that will be dis­crim­i­nat­ing.Please Min­is­ter Ma­haraj, do not let us fight for 20 more years be­fore seis­mic sur­veys are prop­er­ly reg­u­lat­ed. We can­not fid­dle while our fish­ery is van­dalised.

Ter­rence Bed­doe,

Pres­i­dent, FFOS


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored