Last update: 09-Dec-2013 1:43 am
Monday, December 09, 2013
Trinidad & Tobago Guardian Online
You are here
Let land and building taxes rest in peace
The heart and soul, indeed the single most important determining factor in the calculation of the quantum of property taxation for each property is the year in which the requisite rental value-driven valuation was completed and applied. Finance Minister Larry Howai alluded to the fact that by the time residential properties are brought to book again by 2017 the relevant requisite up-to-date valuations will have been completed.
I find it rather puzzling and bizarre to hear the calls from both the Minister of Finance and the Prime Minister for the return or reinstatement of the repealed 1948 Land and Building Taxes Ordinance (L&B) as being a softer palliative and a superior, more humane alternative to the PNM’s Act No 18 of 2009. In my view the L&B regime is more onerous and punitive and should be allowed to just rest in peace.
What also is the position/status with Chapter V of the 1990 Municipal Corporations Act that constituted the legal basis for property tax determination and collection exclusively within the cities and boroughs and which was also repealed by the 2009 Act? Are not most of the industrial properties earmarked for 2014 taxation located within that jurisdiction? The L&B regime excludes the cities and boroughs.
The L&B regime imposes a taxation rate of seven and a half per cent on the annual rateable or taxable value of properties that are based on a current rental values determination and not on the market values of the said property. It also charges ten dollars annually as land tax for properties of less than an acre.
But Act No 18 of 2009 provided for applying a three per cent rate of tax reduced by more than half on the annual taxable value of residential properties that was further reduced by ten per cent contrary to the L&B regime.
Accordingly, it is in my summation a misrepresentation to suggest that the L&B regime should be reinstated as directed by the Prime Minister because it imposes a higher more onerous rate of tax pegged at seven and a half per cent on the prevailing rental value of properties and provides an illusionary and misleading soft-landing for potential and current residential property owners.
This L&B statutory relic should stay repealed and interned. A new property tax regime should be drafted based on the requisite widespread consultative process being undertaken with stakeholders.
User comments posted on this website are the sole views and opinions of the comment writer and are not representative of Guardian Media Limited or its staff. Guardian Media Limited accepts no liability and will not be held accountable for user comments.
Please help us keep out site clean from inappropriate comments by using the flag option.
Guardian Media Limited reserves the right to remove, to edit or to censor any comments. Any content which is considered unsuitable, unlawful or offensive, includes personal details, advertises or promotes products, services or websites or repeats previous comments will be removed.