Former T&T and Manchester United footballer Dwight Yorke yesterday denied he entered into any contract with Chutney Monarch Neval Chatelal to loan him money to pay off a debt following his...
You are here
Sexual orientation not relevant
It is indeed extremely unfortunate that President-elect Paula-Mae Weeks was essentially forced to declare her sexual orientation after social media trolls began spreading propaganda and hate asserting that she was a lesbian.
How exactly does the sexual orientation of the President-elect have anything to do with the competency of the individual elected? Is that a new standard that the society is being asked to now adopt?
Are our colonial hang up and archaic societal constructs so ridged and prejudiced that we cannot see beyond a person’s sexual orientation to determine if they are competent to perform a task for the benefit of the nation.
To suggest that the sexual orientation of a person would affect their job performance, is akin to stating that the sexual orientation of a Chief Justice would affect the justice dispensed by the courts.
Sexual orientation has no place in the selection of a candidate for any job subject to very rare and extraordinary exceptions.
Our nation’s common law and constitutionally guaranteed rights make provision for equality of rights of all citizens irrespective of creed and race as well as sexual orientation.
Previously I had expressed concerns that the Government could not have found a single qualified Hindu for the position of President and thereby make history.
Having regard to the election of Paula-Mae Weeks, as a nation we must respect the appointment and make no attempt to sully the good name of the President-elect.
The Hindu view is that we reincarnate several times, also switching gender as we are born again and again.
Hindu astrology also points out that in one of these births, while the body may have an assigned gender male or female, the person will have to choose their sexual orientation.
Discrimination under any guise such as race, religion and sexual orientation is offensive and reprehensible.
It is time that the Parliament debate the issue of protection of rights of all citizens who may have a different sexual orientation and keep up with the rest of the modern world.
PUNDIT SATYANAND MAHARAJ,
SPIRITUAL HEAD, SATYA ANAND ASHRAM, ARANGUEZ
User comments posted on this website are the sole views and opinions of the comment writer and are not representative of Guardian Media Limited or its staff.
Guardian Media Limited accepts no liability and will not be held accountable for user comments.
Guardian Media Limited reserves the right to remove, to edit or to censor any comments.
Any content which is considered unsuitable, unlawful or offensive, includes personal details, advertises or promotes products, services or websites or repeats previous comments will be removed.
User profiles registered through fake social media accounts may be deleted without notice.