A critical factor also has to do with the mode of appointment of judges and the institutions that appoint them. In a number of countries, panels comprised academics, judges, representatives of NGOs and other outstanding individuals. This was to ensure that the interest of the wider society received some kind of recognition in the whole process. The major problem then in Constitution is how to reconcile the conflicting and sometimes competing objectives of the differing elites. Some need more democracy, some more responsive government; others may want stable government or strong government.The business sector would prefer predictable government so that planning and investment could proceed in a favourable climate. Yet, others may want government to reflect the feelings of every nook and cranny of the electorate. In any case, elections aim at being representative; they can never completely mirror all the interest of an electorate.The size of the majority that one requires for change is also important. Some things should be made difficult and others simpler. But change is interconnected and it is sometimes difficult to disentangle one from the other. What above all should be a guiding principle is a set of rules that ensure that once elected, governments can run their prescribed term. One cannot have one's cake and eat it too.