JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, July 25, 2025

Your Dai­ly Health

Checking pulse could help detect risk of a second stroke

by

20140724

Stroke pa­tients and their fam­i­lies can be taught to mon­i­tor the pa­tient's pulse and de­tect ir­reg­u­lar heart­beats that might lead to an­oth­er stroke, ac­cord­ing to a new study.

Of peo­ple who have a stroke, 40 per cent will suf­fer an­oth­er one with­in the next ten years, said lead au­thor Dr Bernd Kall­mun­z­er of the De­part­ment of Neu­rol­o­gy at Uni­ver­si­tatsklinikum Er­lan­gen in Ger­many.

Tak­ing a pulse read­ing can de­tect atri­al fib­ril­la­tion, a ma­jor risk fac­tor for stroke, and fa­cil­i­tate ap­pro­pri­ate treat­ment to re­duce the risk of an­oth­er stroke or death, Kall­mun­z­er told Reuters Health by e-mail.

The study team test­ed how ac­cu­rate­ly pa­tients and their fam­i­lies could de­tect fib­ril­la­tion just by tak­ing a pulse.

The study, on­line Ju­ly 23 in Neu­rol­o­gy, in­clud­ed 256 pa­tients who had suf­fered a first stroke and were treat­ed at the au­thors' stroke unit in Ger­many in late 2012 or ear­ly 2013. While still hos­pi­talised, the pa­tients and in some cas­es al­so their rel­a­tives were taught to take pulse read­ings from the ra­di­al artery in the left wrist.

The pa­tients and fam­i­lies were al­so giv­en print­ed in­struc­tion ma­te­ri­als and a stop­watch.

Dur­ing the half-hour tu­to­r­i­al, pa­tients were taught to use the stop­watch to mea­sure pulse rate and to recog­nise a nor­mal pulse sen­sa­tion and an ir­reg­u­lar sen­sa­tion that may in­di­cate atri­al fib­ril­la­tion.

Atri­al fib­ril­la­tion feels like a "stum­bling" rhythm and may be faster than 100 beats per minute or slow­er than 50, Kall­mun­z­er said. A nor­mal heart­beat is rhyth­mic and reg­u­lar and on­ly changes slight­ly on in­hale and ex­hale.

The pa­tients were then hooked up to an elec­tri­cal heart mon­i­tor and the screen was cov­ered. A health­care pro­fes­sion­al, the pa­tient and the pa­tient's fam­i­ly all at­tempt­ed to take a pulse read­ing.

Ac­cord­ing to the elec­tri­cal heart mon­i­tor, 172 of the pa­tients had nor­mal heart rhythms and 57 had atri­al fib­ril­la­tions–the rest had an­oth­er kind of ab­nor­mal rhythm. The re­searchers analysed how of­ten wrist pulse read­ings achieved the same re­sult as the elec­tri­cal heart mon­i­tor.

Al­most 90 per cent of the pa­tients who were men­tal­ly able did com­plete a pulse read­ing on them­selves, and cor­rect­ly de­tect­ed 54 per cent of the atri­al fib­ril­la­tions. Health care providers de­tect­ed 97 per cent of atri­al fib­ril­la­tions.

On­ly six pa­tients who thought their heart rates were ir­reg­u­lar were in­cor­rect. A false-pos­i­tive rate that low is en­cour­ag­ing, the au­thors write.

Among pa­tients with atri­al fib­ril­la­tion whose fam­i­ly mem­bers took the tu­to­r­i­al, rel­a­tives de­tect­ed the ir­reg­u­lar beats 77 per cent of the time by tak­ing the pa­tient's pulse.

When atri­al fib­ril­la­tion is de­tect­ed, med­ica­tion can re­duce the risk of a sec­ond stroke by 60 to 70 per cent in com­par­i­son to not treat­ing pa­tients, ac­cord­ing to Rolf Wachter of Uni­ver­si­tatsmedi­zin Got­tin­gen in Ger­many, who was not in­volved in the study.

"This is, I would say, one of the most ef­fec­tive ther­a­pies in med­i­cine," he told Reuters Health in an e-mail.

"We do not specif­i­cal­ly know whether the ap­proach in this pa­per is re­al­ly the best ap­proach. Oth­er meth­ods, in­clud­ing us­ing a ma­chine to mon­i­tor heart rhythm, might be bet­ter at de­tect­ing fib­ril­la­tions, but they haven't been com­pared to each oth­er in a tri­al," he said.

"In gen­er­al, tak­ing your pulse is easy, harm­less and free from side ef­fects. There­fore any­one can try to do it," Kall­mun­z­er said. "In stroke pa­tients with very se­vere dis­abil­i­ty, fam­i­ly mem­bers, friends or nurs­es can do the mea­sure­ments for the pa­tient."

The risk of a sec­ond stroke is high­est dur­ing the months af­ter the first one, but cur­rent­ly re­searchers do not know ex­act­ly how long this kind of pulse mon­i­tor­ing should go on, he said. (Reuters Health)


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored