Following a four-hour marathon meeting on Friday evening which saw members of the Law Association Council offering their resignation, president Dana Seetahal, SC, yesterday resigned. The T&T Guardian was reliably informed Seetahal, who has held the post for over a year, tendered her resignation through an e-mail to the members of the incumbent 17-member council yesterday. Speaking to reporters after the meeting at the Hall of Justice, Port-of-Spain, on Friday, senior ordinary member Douglas Mendes, SC, who spoke on behalf of the association, said all the members of the council had offered their resignations to the membership. The emergency meeting was called in response to the disappearance of $284,000 from the association's accounts.
At the meeting on Friday, members of the association agreed to report the financial irregularity to the Fraud Squad, which is expected to launch a criminal investigation. Despite their offer to resign, the membership voted to have the council members keep their posts until the association's annual elections, due this month. After the meeting, Seetahal withdrew her nomination for re-election as president. Senior Counsel Israel Khan, Seetahal's only competitor in the election, also withdrew his nomination at the meeting. When contacted yesterday, Khan said he was yet to decide whether to re-enter his nomination for the post.
Khan suggested Queen's Counsel Karl Hudson-Phillips should offer himself for the part-time post. In a press release yesterday, four junior ordinary members-Daniel Khan, Theresa Hadad-Maraj, Shankar Bidaisee and Sophia Vailoo - criticised Seetahal and treasurer Kemrajh Harrikissoon for not resigning in a timely manner. "Notwithstanding the fact that the junior ordinary members, at no time, were singled out as being responsible, pursuant to the guidance and advice of Hudson-Phillips, they thought it fit and proper to nevertheless do the honourable thing and resign," the release said. The elections, which were initially scheduled for March 16, were postponed after the association brought a statutory interpretation suit earlier this year asking the High Court to determine whether state attorneys could vote and participate in the elections. On March 26, Justice Maureen Rajnauth-Lee ruled that under the Legal Profession Act, state attorneys or law officers could not participate. Almost 300 law officers appealed the decision. The appeal judgment is expected to be delivered later this month.
