Fees amounting to US$18.5 million were paid to managers of the non-US Core International Equity Fund of the Heritage and Stabilisation Fund (HSF) in 2011 while only US$10 million in profits was realised. This was the issue that appeared to cause concern among both Government and Opposition members of a parliamentary Public Accounts Committee (PAC) meeting yesterday as they met with representatives of the Central Bank and the Ministry of Finance.
The information was contained in the annual financial statement of the HSF for the year ending September 2011, which is to be laid in Parliament soon by the Minister of Finance. "Before riot breaks out among the members here, we are not interested in the previous year. "The committee is only dealing with 2011, not 2010 or 2012," PAC chairman, Opposition MP Colm Imbert, told Central Bank Governor Ewart Williams.
PAC member, Anand Ramlogan, summed up his colleagues concern this way: "Essentially, people were being paid to beat the benchmark and were not beating it." Imbert added: "Is it good business that in excess of TT$100 million is paid in fees? "As lay people, we are trying to find out. Are you happy you paid them US$18-plus million to earn US$10 million?"
Imbert wanted to know if managers managing sovereign funds in other parts of the world were dealt with in the same way. Williams, in trying to explain how eight managers and one global custodian of the non-US fund were paid US$18.5 million, referred to 2010 and 2012 figures.
He sought to show that the non-US account of the HSF showed increases from as far back as 2007 right down to 2010 and again in 2012. "As far as we are concerned, we are still ahead of the game," he insisted. He said it was misleading to look at the fund over any one particular year and say it was bad.
The debt crisis in Europe affected the fund in 2011, he said, noting the Greece bailout. He added: "In the last quarter of the fiscal year, the European investment climate turned very bad. Investors were pulling their money out of European entities. "You can't identify one part of the year and let it be seen as a basis of poor management and punish managers."
He said the managers were paid fees for every service they performed, based on the market value of the fund, not on its gains or losses. These managers were hired, basically, to outperform the market-based benchmark they were given and would have outperformed the benchmark up until the end of June 2011, Alister Noel, Central Bank's senior manager in operations, added.
Insisting the loss was not that large, Williams said there was US$4 billion in the HSF, with US$621 million held in the Non-US account. But Imbert was not interested in that kind of information. He wanted Williams to state specifically what checks and balances were in place in 2011 to minimise any loss.
The PAC meeting, which started late, did not last long. Williams was given a number of questions to answer at another session. "We need to clean this up," Imbert said.
