The business community, civil groups and the Opposition have all dismissed National?Security Minister Jack?Warner's announcement on Tuesday that the crime situation is not as grim as it seems. Some have even expressed surprise at his statement. Warner, at a press conference, using statistics to back up his claim, said there was an almost three per cent reduction in murders between January and Tuesday, compared to the same period last year.
"We don't feel the same way...The situation is grim and needs urgent attention," Catherine Kumar, chief executive officer of the T&T Chamber of Commerce, said. "We were quite surprised at his comments." Kumar said previous reported statistics actually showed an increase in crime. "But I imagine he has the correct facts," she added. Kumar said a three per cent reduction is insignificant since there are way too many murders.
"It's not at an acceptable level," she noted. Kumar said the crime situation continues to make the business community very uneasy. "We have not been able to develop something to curb crime in a serious way, particularly murders, and there is a concern," she said. Gregory Aboud, president of the Downtown Owners and Merchants Association (DOMA), said T&T "is in the midst of another very serious and dangerous period of criminal activity.
"One can understand Warner's defensive reaction to the reporting of crime statistics by the media," he said. "Having just assumed office, one can understand he is not responsible for the very serious crime situation, nor could he be expected to have any drastic impact in the short time he has been the Minister of National?Security. "But the minister should realise very quickly that citizens will not be satisfied with a three per cent or 30 per cent reduction in murders.
"We are all aware that over the past ten years there has been an increase of between 400 per cent and 500 per cent in serious crimes, particularly murders." He said any attempt to minimise the seriousness of crime in the downtown city centre actually causes people to become more uneasy and scared. "People assume that DOMA is not taking their safety as seriously as it should be taken," he added.
He said any similar attempt by the Government to minimise the seriousness of crime would also result in citizens losing confidence in the State's ability to protect them. Aboud said the traditional positions of governments was to speak about their accomplishments. "But the infamous remark by a previous minister that there was a 'decrease in the increase' in crime is all we need remember to reinforce this point."
He said DOMA hoped Warner would do away with these traditional positions. "We have hopes he will restore confidence in citizens by accepting we are in the midst of another very serious and dangerous period of criminal activity." The Tunapuna Chamber had a similar position. President Taran Singh said the reality was that the crime rate was still very high. "A three per cent reduction is like saying you had 100 murders and now you have 97," he said.
"We want a 20 per cent reduction. There is a lot of work to be done still. "While we are not questioning the figures, the business community in a developing country can't accept a three per cent crime reduction." Singh said the chamber remained optimistic about Warner's capabilities. "The minister has crime plans and we are expecting to see more allocations to national security in the upcoming budget," he said.
Ibrahim Ali, of the San Juan Chamber, said no one could convince him crime has decreased when he sees on a daily basis the number of murders taking place. "In the San Juan/El?Socorro constituency, we are very uneasy," he said. Ali said the chamber agrees with the minister's plans to have more police manpower and a greater presence on the streets. He noted, however, that problems in the court system also needed to be addressed.
Opposition MP Colm Imbert asked: "How on earth you can have a three per cent reduction in crime? "There are more murders this year than last year. What nonsense is he talking about?" Fixin T&T, a civil society group, said it places no credence in anything Warner has to say. "We reiterate our position that he should not hold any ministerial post until there is a favourable outcome of a thorough and efficient investigation into all matters concerning him." The group called on the Prime Minister to provide a detailed explanation to citizens to justify Warner's presence in her Cabinet.
