Officials who hold high public office must be cautious about making statements on very sensitive matters, especially if these matters end up before them.So said political scientist Dr Winford James yesterday while commenting on statements made by the chairman of the Integrity Commission, Ken Gordon.In an interview with the T&T Guardian on Tuesday, Gordon said allegations made by Opposition Leader Dr Keith Rowley on the basis of a series of e-mails revealed in Parliament were a "very disturbing development from any point of view."
James said: "It is probably better not to comment, especially if the matter may eventually come before them."One has to be very careful not to make statements which may seem to be prejudice."In analysing Gordon's statement, however, James, said there was no doubt that the allegations did in fact constitute a very serious development."If you look at this statement, it is not particularly compromising. He (Gordon) is not blaming anybody," James said.Agreeing with James, Stanley Marcus, SC, said Gordon ought not to be criticised.
He said when Gordon made the statement he did not castigate anyone but rather expressed the sentiment of members of the public about what was revealed in Parliament, whether theallegations were true or not.In October 2011 a previous chairman of the Integrity Commission, Dr Eric St Cyr, stepped down after he confirmed to a newspaper that Jearlean John, managing director of the Housing Development Corporation (HDC), was under investigation.Even after he resigned it was reported in the media that St Cyr felt he had done no wrong.The commission's communications manager Mervyn Crichlow said yesterday although the commission's board had been dissolved Gordon remained the chairman until his term expired on October 30, 2014.
Gordon was appointed in November 2011.
