JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, July 21, 2025

CJ summons judges

by

20131208

Chief Jus­tice Ivor Archie has sum­moned judges to an im­por­tant meet­ing to­day at the Hall of Jus­tice in Port-of-Spain in the face of what ju­di­cia­ry sources say is an "un­pro­voked as­sault" on the ad­min­is­tra­tion of jus­tice.But oth­er se­nior prac­ti­tion­ers and some judges main­tain that the de­mand for long-await­ed judg­ments be­fore the Court of Ap­peal is jus­ti­fied and should not be seen as an at­tack on the ju­di­cia­ry or the Chief Jus­tice.

At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Anand Ram­lo­gan has pub­licly crit­i­cised the ju­di­cia­ry for fail­ing to fast-track civ­il cas­es where for­mer pub­lic of­fi­cials are ac­cused of fraud.The meet­ing among the judges al­so comes on the heels of the lat­est Salaries Re­view Com­mis­sion (SRC) re­port which, sources say, has rec­om­mend­ed a sub­stan­tial in­crease in the hous­ing al­lowance from $10,500 to more than $20,000, which would al­low judges to rent "su­per-grade" hous­es, and would al­so give them a re­port­ed 15 per cent salary in­crease.

Judges have long main­tained that they are en­ti­tled to a hous­ing al­lowance which would al­low them to rent su­per-grade hous­es. At present, on­ly the Chief Jus­tice oc­cu­pies a su­per-grade house, at Good­wood Park, Glen­coe.In the past, as part of their terms and con­di­tions, judges were al­lowed to oc­cu­py hous­es at Fed­er­a­tion Park, Port-of-Spain but un­der the Na­tion­al Al­liance for Re­con­struc­tion (NAR) ad­min­is­tra­tion in the 1980s, that pro­vi­sion was tak­en away and the judges were grant­ed a hous­ing al­lowance.

The SRC re­port was sched­uled to be laid in Par­lia­ment on Fri­day but par­lia­men­tary sources told the T&T Guardian that it had not been pre­sent­ed.Over the last few weeks, sev­er­al sto­ries be­gan sur­fac­ing in the print me­dia, ques­tion­ing the over­seas trav­el of the Chief Jus­tice and his tar­di­ness in de­liv­er­ing judg­ments in both civ­il and crim­i­nal ap­peals.Ju­di­cia­ry sources said they viewed the sto­ries as a cam­paign against the Chief Jus­tice to dri­ve him out of of­fice.

A sto­ry in last week's Sun­shine news­pa­per claimed Archie was about to quit his job to take up a ju­di­cial ap­point­ment in Dubai, in the Unit­ed Arab Emi­rates. But sources close to Archie last week dis­missed the re­port as un­true. The ru­mour had been mak­ing its rounds in top le­gal and ju­di­cial cir­cles over the last few weeks.

More re­cent­ly, two death row in­mates--Lester Pit­man, who was con­vict­ed of the Cas­cade triple mur­ders, and Ger­ard Wil­son--wrote to the Reg­is­trar of the Supreme Court, Maris­sa Robert­son, threat­en­ing to pe­ti­tion the Prime Min­is­ter to im­peach the Chief Jus­tice. The Ap­peal Court re­served its de­ci­sion in March 2010 and No­vem­ber 2009, re­spec­tive­ly, in those cas­es.

Last Thurs­day, in a le­gal let­ter, Criston Williams, the at­tor­ney rep­re­sent­ing the two con­vict­ed killers, threat­ened to file a con­sti­tu­tion­al mo­tion against Archie and the ju­di­cia­ry, be­cause the de­lays al­leged­ly breached his clients' con­sti­tu­tion­al rights. To sup­port his claim, Williams list­ed 25 crim­i­nal ap­peals dealt with by the Ap­peal Court over the past 15 years, in which judg­ments were de­liv­ered with­in a year of the hear­ing of the ap­peal.

In re­sponse, the Law As­so­ci­a­tion ex­pressed "deep con­cern" about the in­or­di­nate de­lay in the de­liv­ery of judg­ments and said it was is­su­ing a "clar­i­on call" to the Ju­di­cia­ry to treat the de­lay is­sue as a pri­or­i­ty.Archie, who presided over both ap­peals with two oth­er ap­pel­late judges, has promised to de­liv­er the writ­ten judg­ments be­fore the Christ­mas break starts next week. The Ap­peal Court has giv­en no­tice that the de­ci­sion in Wil­son's case will be hand­ed down on De­cem­ber 18.

Ju­di­cia­ry: we're cut­ting down de­lays

Ac­cord­ing to the 2013-2014 an­nu­al re­port of the Ju­di­cia­ry, the de­liv­ery of jus­tice has reached an all-time high. The fig­ures shows a marked in­crease in the clear­ance rate from 385 in the last pe­ri­od to 548 this year."This is large­ly a re­sult of the in­crease in non-com­pli­ance mat­ters list­ed and dis­posed dur­ing the pe­ri­od," the re­port states.The Ap­peal Court rou­tine­ly dis­miss­es these mat­ters, which are not filed in keep­ing with the rules of court.

Non-com­pli­ance mat­ters spiked this year from ze­ro in 2011-2012 to 167 in this term, which the re­port de­scribed as a "sig­nif­i­cant" in­crease.Ac­cord­ing to the ju­di­cia­ry re­port, 5,230 civ­il mat­ters were filed at the High Court in the 2012-2013 term alone and de­ter­mi­na­tions were made on 5,245.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored