You are here

Judiciary issues statement on delayed judgments

Published: 
Saturday, December 14, 2013
Chief Justice Ivor Archie

Following is the full text of the official statement issued by the judiciary on December 13, 2013.

 

The Judiciary of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago has taken note of recent comments by various sections of the national community and reproduced in the media on the issue of delays in the delivery of judgments by members of the local Bench. This matter has been actively engaging the attention of the Judiciary, and became an agenda item for a meeting of Judges of the Court of Appeal and Judges and Masters of the High Court, convened and chaired by The Honourable The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Ivor Archie, last Monday (December 9, 2013)

 

The Judiciary wishes to indicate to all of its stakeholders that it views with utmost seriousness all of the relevant concerns expressed.  It acknowledges the problem and takes responsibility for the state of affairs. But the institution also wishes to assure the national community that it will intensify the efforts it has been undertaking over several years to realize improvements in the situation. This will be done against an understanding that timeliness and quality must co-exist in all decision-making if there is to be sustainable public trust and confidence in the administration of justice in Trinidad and Tobago.

 

 

The Judiciary has realized significant improvement in its quest for timely decisions and delivery of judgments and disposition of cases. This has always been a concern of the institution, and the gains reflect the efforts of the current Chief Justice and predecessors over the years towards amelioration. Actions by the Judiciary have included the introduction and application of technology in case management, the recruitment of more Judges and Masters, the creation of special Courts such as the Family Court and the Drug Treatment Court to deal with specific societal  issues, the creation of a Department of Court Administration to free up Judges from administrative responsibilities to enable them to concentrate on their core function of judging, and the promulgation of new rules of procedure and re-engineering of its processes.

 

The outturn of all this has been that where previously there were matters awaiting determination for as many as 10 years, the more recent picture is one in which any matter before the Court for more than three years is an exception. Our most up-to-date statistics reveal that there are 37 matters awaiting decisions from the Court of Appeal, with 18 of these for more than one year. Two of the 18 have to be rescheduled because of the unfortunate passing of one of the Judges of the Appeal Court. Of the remaining 16, the Honourable The Chief Justice is a part of the panel in five matters. Notices have already been issued informing the parties that judgment will be delivered in four of them on December 18, 2013, including the cases of Lester Pitman and Gerard Wilson.  In addition, a further two of those matters will also be delivered before December 20, 2013. Of the 18 matters reserved for judgment in 2013, notices have been issued to the parties that decisions in nine of them will be delivered on or before December 18, 2013.

 

In summary, therefore, 16 reserved decisions will be given before December 20, 2013. It needs hardly be mentioned that work would obviously have been ongoing on these matters before the recent furor in the media.

 

The task of delivering judgments in a timely manner presents different challenges in the Court of Appeal when compared to the High Court. Even though one judge may be designated to produce a draft decision, all three must collaborate and come collectively to a decision. That may involve competing opinions and several discussions and redrafts. It is not the case that the most senior or presiding judge is always responsible for producing the judgment. Work is allocated based on a number of factors including current workload or special expertise. All of the Judges of the Court of Appeal work extremely hard, and are conscious of the fact that a bad judgment delivered speedily can create binding precedent that seriously undermines confidence in the administration of justice.

 

The work of the Court of Appeal has increased dramatically in recent years, and the issue of delay is further complicated by the fact that the Court has been inundated by procedural appeals which, according to the Rules of Court, must be given a hearing within 28 days.

 

Statistics previously published in the Judiciary’s 2013 Annual Report and available on the Judiciary’s website show that the number of Civil Appeals disposed of (excluding non- compliance matters) rose by over 150% from 82 in 2007 -2008, to 217 in 2012-2013. The current Chief Justice assumed office in 2008. During the same period, the clearance rate (i.e. the ratio of matters disposed of in a given year to matters filed) rose from 0.60 to 1.05.

 

For a significant part of that period, the Court has been operating at reduced numerical strength owing to the retirement of one Appellate Judge and the injury and untimely death of another. Additionally, the statutory quota of judges has never been filled.

 

For both the High Court and the Court of Appeal there is an inexorable arithmetic that constrains the delivery of judgments. The more matters that are fixed for hearing, the less time there is to write judgments. Nevertheless, the High Court has been able to maintain a disposition to filing ratio of approximately 1.0 in recent years and the majority of matters are disposed of within 2 years of being filed (this  includes case management, trial and delivery of judgment).

 

For the Honourable the Chief Justice and the Judiciary as a whole, this situation remains unsatisfactory, and all Judges and Masters pledged at their meeting earlier to intensify efforts towards further reversal of the challenging state of affairs.

 

In this regard, the meeting of Judges and Masters on December 9, 2013 agreed as follows:

 

  • By March 31, 2014 all decisions outstanding for more than 12 months at that date will be delivered

 

  • By the July 30, 2014, all decisions outstanding for more than six months at that date will be delivered

 

Court of Appeal and High Court Judges and Masters will meet again in January 2014 to discuss further, and implement measures to deal systematically with the issue of delay in the delivery of judgments, with further meetings scheduled for March and July 2014 to monitor progress.

 

During his address at the opening of the 2013-2014 Law Term in September this year, the Honourable the Chief Justice advanced a number of suggestions for improving the administration of Justice in Trinidad and Tobago generally through the implementation of badly needed reforms in the Criminal Justice System. His proposals were made against an acknowledgement that collaboration between the Judiciary and other justice sector partners, including the Executive and the Trinidad and Tobago Law Association, was the best formula to forge the reforms necessary to correct the ills in the country’s justice system 

 

The Judiciary has promoted this collaboration with the establishment of a Justice Sector Inter-Ministerial Committee which The Honourable The Chief Justice has been chairing for the past four years since its inception. Under this umbrella, and without any compromise on its independence, the Judiciary has fostered the very best relations with the Executive, and it is in this context also that The Honourable The Chief Justice is surprised at widespread reports of a plot to have him demit office. No such assertion against the state was made in the meeting of Judges and Masters on December 9, 2013 contrary to reports appearing in the media.

 

In any event, the Honourable the Chief Justice remains committed to a strong, independent, professional and high performing Judiciary and will continue to pursue the most robust action to ensure this is maintained.

 

Disclaimer

User comments posted on this website are the sole views and opinions of the comment writer and are not representative of Guardian Media Limited or its staff. Guardian Media Limited accepts no liability and will not be held accountable for user comments.

Please help us keep out site clean from inappropriate comments by using the flag option.

Guardian Media Limited reserves the right to remove, to edit or to censor any comments. Any content which is considered unsuitable, unlawful or offensive, includes personal details, advertises or promotes products, services or websites or repeats previous comments will be removed.

Before posting, please refer to the Community Standards, Terms and conditions and Privacy Policy