JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, July 24, 2025

Former henchman points fingers at drug cartel

by

20131229

For­mer At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Ramesh Lawrence Ma­haraj is ex­pect­ed meet this week with lawyers for his broth­er, Kr­ish­na Ma­haraj, in Mi­a­mi fol­low­ing re­ports that new ev­i­dence giv­en by a for­mer Columbian drug baron could pos­si­bly over­turn his dou­ble mur­der con­vic­tion.

Af­ter spend­ing 27 years in a Flori­da pen­i­ten­tiary, Kr­ish­na Ma­haraj, a 74-year-old British cit­i­zen, could walk free af­ter be­ing sen­tenced to death for the mur­der of his Ja­maican busi­ness part­ner Der­rick Moo Young and his 23-year-old son Du­ane. Moo Young, 55, was shot six times while Du­ane was shot once in the face at the Mi­a­mi Dupont Plaza Ho­tel on Oc­to­ber 16, 1988.

In his fi­nal ap­peal next month, Ma­haraj's lawyers plan to present a sworn state­ment from El Asis­tente, a for­mer hench­man of late drug king­pin Pablo Es­cabar, which im­pli­cates the Medellin Car­tel in the Moo Youngs' mur­der.

In an in­ter­view yes­ter­day, Ma­haraj said al­though he does not have all the de­tails of this new ev­i­dence, his fam­i­ly was hap­py to hear that Kr­ish­na might be freed. Ma­haraj, who is va­ca­tion­ing with his son in the Cay­man Is­lands, said he will be fly­ing out to Mi­a­mi to­day where he will meet Kr­ish­na's lawyer to dis­cuss the fi­nal ap­peal hear­ing.

"Kris has al­ways main­tained that he was in­no­cent and it's be­cause of his poor le­gal rep­re­sen­ta­tion at the tri­al he was con­vict­ed. There have been a lot of peo­ple from Eng­land and Amer­i­ca who have claimed that he was in­no­cent. I have spo­ken to his lawyers and they have al­ways main­tained that one day he will be free be­cause of the ev­i­dence which they are in­ves­ti­gat­ing to show that he did not com­mit those crimes.

"It has been a long le­gal bat­tle but I was very hap­py when I heard that there has been not on­ly a wit­ness, but even the po­lice in­ves­ti­ga­tors have giv­en ev­i­dence to show that he is not guilty."The Unit­ed King­don's Dai­ly Mail re­port­ed yes­ter­day that El Asis­tente's state­ment gave spe­cif­ic de­tails of the mur­ders, say­ing it was a pro­fes­sion­al hit on the Moo Youngs who were laun­der­ing mon­ey from drug car­tels. He named Medellin as­sas­sin Guiller­mo "Cuchilla" Zu­lu­a­ga as the mur­der­er.

Part of El Asis­tente state­ment said: "I am giv­ing this be­cause I have re­con­nect­ed with my re­li­gious faith. The idea that Kr­ish­na Ma­haraj has served more than a quar­ter-cen­tu­ry in prison for a crime I know he did not com­mit ap­palls me. I want to set the record straight and en­sure he gets jus­tice."Next month's hear­ing is Ma­haraj's fi­nal chance to ap­peal. His orig­i­nal death sen­tence was over­turned at an ear­li­er ap­peal in 2003. About to turn 75, his ear­li­est pos­si­ble re­lease date is cur­rent­ly 2040.

The Dai­ly Mail al­so re­port­ed that sev­er­al for­mer po­lice of­fi­cers have been pro­vid­ing ev­i­dence that their cor­rupt col­leagues had "fab­ri­cat­ed the case against Ma­haraj to hide the car­tels' in­volve­ment".

Just months af­ter Clive Stafford Smith, of the hu­man rights char­i­ty Re­prieve, be­came Ma­haraj's lawyer in 1994 he dis­cov­ered cru­cial doc­u­ments which had been hid­den all along in po­lice files. They re­vealed that at the time of their deaths, the Moo Youngs were ne­go­ti­at­ing to buy a Pana­man­ian bank for �400 mil­lion and were in­volved in bond deals worth �3 bil­lion.

Analy­sis of their fi­nan­cial records by ac­coun­tants Ernst & Young states the Moo Youngs' re­al busi­ness was mon­ey-laun­der­ing–on a mind-bog­gling scale. But rich as they were, the analy­sis says, they were al­so greedy, skim­ming an ex­tra one per cent from every deal they did for their car­tel clients.

That ap­peared to be a much more plau­si­ble rea­son for the mur­ders than Ma­haraj's miss­ing �300,000. Now, fol­low­ing fur­ther en­quiries by Re­prieve in the US and Colom­bia, the the­o­ry has been cor­rob­o­rat­ed by car­tel mem­bers them­selves."Es­co­bar com­plained di­rect­ly to me that the Moo Youngs had stolen his mon­ey and that of his part­ners and had to die," El Asis­tente says un­der oath. We can­not re­veal his true iden­ti­ty, nor the cir­cum­stances of his in­ter­view.

"There are a num­ber of peo­ple who I know in­tend to kill me," he says.His re­la­tion­ship with Es­co­bar and the ex­tent of his knowl­edge of car­tel op­er­a­tions have been con­firmed by two king­pins Stafford Smith in­ter­viewed in US pris­ons. One is a top Medellin boss who can­not yet be named. The oth­er is Miguel Ro­driguez-Ore­juela, 69, a leader of the ri­val Cali car­tel, whom Stafford Smith met at a jail in South Car­oli­na, where he is serv­ing a 30-year sen­tence for traf­fick­ing co­caine to the US.

Kr­ish­na's at­tor­ney Stafford found key state­ments about the Moo Youngs' deal­ing with the car­tels which had been hid­den. How­ev­er, Ma­haraj said he does not be­lieve there was a cov­er-up in the US ju­di­cial sys­tem to pin the mur­der on his broth­er.

"I won't say there was a cov­er up but I would say in any so­ci­ety where the po­lice have made an er­ror, it is al­ready very dif­fi­cult for them to ad­mit an er­ror so I think that is all part and par­cel. That is how the le­gal sys­tem op­er­ates. As a lawyer I see this op­er­ate in Trinidad. There are peo­ple who claim that they are not guilty and ul­ti­mate­ly are found not to be guilty.

"My broth­er has suf­fered a lot of in­ci­dents in the prison, he is not is good health. My oth­er broth­er saw him re­cent­ly and he is very frail. The fam­i­ly is hap­py about the news and I plan to go see him but you have to arrange vis­its as there are lim­it­ed vis­its to fam­i­ly mem­bers. I plan to see him but I would prob­a­bly have to go back to Mi­a­mi lat­er this year."

Kr­ish­na mi­grat­ed to Eng­land in 1960 where he es­tab­lished a suc­cess­ful food im­port com­pa­ny and lat­er owned Britain's sec­ond largest sta­ble. IHe be­came quite a pop­u­lar in Lon­don's lime­light and gained many celebri­ty friends.He loved col­lect­ing Rolls-Royces–he usu­al­ly owned four at a time–but Ma­haraj's great­est pas­sion was race­hors­es. At one time, he owned 110 � the sec­ond-biggest sta­ble in Britain.

In 1974, the year he met and mar­ried his wife, Mari­ta, a Por­tuguese banker, his horse King Lev­anstell won the pres­ti­gious Queen Alexan­dra Stakes at Roy­al As­cot, de­feat­ing a thor­ough­bred owned by the Queen.The fate­ful path that led Ma­haraj to death row start­ed when he be­gan to in­vest in prop­er­ty in the 1980s. He formed a busi­ness with Der­rick Moo Young, os­ten­si­bly a re­spectable Flori­da busi­ness­man. How­ev­er, Ma­haraj says he soon dis­cov­ered that Moo Young had em­bez­zled �300,000 from the firm they set up.

Ma­haraj has al­ways in­sist­ed that he was hav­ing lunch 30 miles away at the time–an al­i­bi sup­port­ed by five wit­ness­es, who, in­ex­plic­a­bly, were nev­er called to tes­ti­fy at his tri­al. But his fin­ger­prints were in room 1215.The rea­son, he has al­ways main­tained, was that he had been let in­to the room to at­tend a busi­ness meet­ing there ear­li­er that day. But the man he was wait­ing for did not turn up, so he left.

The pros­e­cu­tion claimed Ma­haraj's dis­pute over the �300,000 was mo­tive for the mur­ders–a claim he an­gri­ly de­nies. In an in­ter­view in prison in Au­gust, he said: "If I'd want­ed to kill him, sure­ly I'd have wait­ed un­til I got my mon­ey?"Kr­ish­na's sto­ry is doc­u­ment­ed in a book ti­tled In­jus­tice writ­ten by one of his lawyers, Clyde Stafford.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored