JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, July 14, 2025

La Brea MP sees link to Corexit

by

20140121

La Brea MP Fitzger­ald Jef­frey says oil spillaf­fect­ed res­i­dents of Cof­fee Beach are falling sick and he be­lieves their ill­ness­es are linked to Petrotrin's use of the dis­per­sant Corex­it 9500. Corex­it 9500 was sci­en­tif­i­cal­ly linked to can­cer af­ter it was used dur­ing the 2010 BP Gulf of Mex­i­co oil spill. The US En­vi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion Agency (EPA) flagged the chem­i­cal dis­per­sant for its can­cer-caus­ing agents. Red flags were al­so raised lo­cal­ly when Petrotrin ad­mit­ted to us­ing it in the ini­tial days af­ter the De­cem­ber 17, oil spills in La Brea.

Petrotrin said it used Corex­it 9500 for two days at the start of clean-up op­er­a­tions. The com­pa­ny de­fend­ed its use of Corex­it, say­ing it is list­ed as one of the ap­proved dis­per­sants on the Na­tion­al Oil Spill Con­tin­gency Plan and was used in ac­cor­dance with ap­proved guide­lines. Speak­ing with the T&T Guardian in a tele­phone in­ter­view yes­ter­day, Jef­frey said res­i­dents at Cof­fee Beach, the hard­est hit area dur­ing the oil spill, have been com­plain­ing of feel­ing un­well.

"Yes, the beach has al­most been com­plete­ly cleaned, ex­cept in the man­grove...It still has a lot of work to be done in the man­grove, but peo­ple are com­plain­ing about dizzi­ness, headaches, bel­ly pain, chest pain, itch­ing and so on and that wor­ries me," he said. Jef­frey said he re­viewed what hap­pened in Alas­ka (af­ter the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill), the Gulf of Mex­i­co (BP spill) and what res­i­dents have been com­plain­ing about and he is dis­tressed.

"We re­alise that there is a sim­i­lar­i­ty in the com­plaints and in the case of the Alas­ka sit­u­a­tion we re­alise that there is a kind of can­cer that is re­lat­ed to, at­trib­uted to the use of the chem­i­cal, Corex­it 9500. So peo­ple are a lit­tle bit con­cerned about that," he said. The La Brea MP said Petrotrin must ad­dress all health con­cerns raised by the res­i­dents, not on­ly in the im­me­di­ate fu­ture but lat­er down the road as well.

"I just hope that Petrotrin will re­al­ly and tru­ly in­tro­duce free test­ing and do pe­ri­od­ic test­ing from time to time on a free ba­sis so that peo­ples' health is not com­pro­mised," he said. "I think that every res­i­dent should have been test­ed from the time we had the oil spill and we do pe­ri­od­ic test­ing to see if the sit­u­a­tion has been ag­gra­vat­ed and so on." Jef­frey said long-term mon­i­tor­ing must be im­ple­ment­ed in the area to en­sure the res­i­dents' health is looked af­ter.

"Some kind of arrange­ment must be made to give these peo­ple prop­er health­care, even if it is for a ten-year or a 15-year pe­ri­od and so on, be­cause the oil spill is not of their do­ing...They were in­no­cent by­standers," he said. Jef­frey said he in­tends to hold a me­dia con­fer­ence to­mor­row (Thurs­day) where he will fur­ther dis­cuss his con­cerns. "We want to look at the chem­i­cal that was used in the clean up...it has some con­se­quence I think we can­not treat very light­ly," he added.

Jef­frey said he al­so wants to ad­dress the is­sue of com­pen­sa­tion for not on­ly the fish­er­men, but res­i­dents in the area. He al­so said crab catch­ers whose liveli­hoods are af­fect­ed by the oil spill's im­pact on the Aripero man­grove should be com­pen­sat­ed. Yes­ter­day, En­vi­ron­men­tal Man­age­ment Au­thor­i­ty (EMA) of­fi­cials re­turned to Point Sable beach, where they met with con­trac­tors and Petrotrin staff and did air-qual­i­ty mon­i­tor­ing tests.

Fri­day said in­ves­ti­ga­tions in­to the cause of the oil spill which oc­curred on De­cem­ber 17 at Pointe-a-Pierre are con­tin­u­ing and the op­er­a­tional re­port on the spill was re­viewed on Mon­day. "How­ev­er, in­ves­ti­ga­tions are con­tin­u­ing," she said.

Man­grove in trou­ble

En­vi­ron­men­tal ac­tivist Marc De Ver­teuil says he is dis­sat­is­fied with Petrotrin's de­lay in clean­ing up the oil-spillaf­fect­ed Aripero Man­grove. De Ver­teuil, a di­rec­tor of the en­vi­ron­men­tal group Pa­pa Bois Con­ser­va­tion, said on his vis­it to the man­grove on Mon­day he found an ab­sence of clean-up crews and the oil spill most present. "We were sur­prised to find no clean-up crews ac­tive (in the man­grove on Mon­day)," he said.

"The beach looked much clean­er than when I was there a week ago, but there was still sig­nif­i­cant oil on the beach and the man­grove was still very much oil slicked. "The man­grove roots are cov­ered in oil and is start­ing to show signs of ba­si­cal­ly be­ing af­fect­ed by the oil spill. There were yel­low leaves on the man­grove." De Ver­teuil said ac­cord­ing to the US NOAA (Na­tion­al Ocean­ic and At­mos­pher­ic Ad­min­is­tra­tion), yel­low­ing leaves are a sign that the man­grove is be­ing af­fect­ed by oil and the trees are dy­ing.

He said: "I am not at all pleased with the cleanup. We are well in­to a month since the oil spill oc­curred and the man­grove is far from be­ing cleaned. The man­grove clean-up is very time sen­si­tive." De Ver­teuil added that the oil spill im­pact will be "very long-term" on the man­grove, since NOAA says it takes ten to 50 years for man­groves af­fect­ed by oil spills to ful­ly re­cov­er.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored