You are here

Group challenges ministry’s approval

Orange Grove Savannah project goes to court...
Wednesday, January 29, 2014

A group of activists opposing the construction of a sporting facility at the Orange Grove Savannah has initiated legal action challenging the planning permission granted for the project. In its claim, filed in the Port-of-Spain High Court on Monday, the “Save Our Orange Grove Savannah” group is seeking a declaration that the approval granted by the Ministry of Planning and Sustainable Development on September 27 last year is illegal, null, void and of no effect. 



They contend that the ministry breached its duty under the Town and Country Planning Act by failing to consult with the Tunapuna/Piarco Regional Corporation and members of the public before granting approval. The legislation requires the ministry to consult with the regional body which controls the site of the proposed project and to invite members of the public to make objections which would be considered by a public inquiry.


The group consists of 17 people who live in areas near the savannah including Trincity, Tacarigua and Arouca, as well as two sports clubs, the Ulric “Buggy” Haynes Coaching School and the Dinsley Cricket Club. The group is also asking the court to quash the approval and order the ministry to carry out a “procedurally fair” consultation process in accordance with the legislation.


In October, the Sports Company of T&T (SPORTT) announced the beginning of construction of the proposed facility, which will include an international-standard football field, an athletics track, a 900-seat covered pavilion, public toilets and concessionaire spaces, and an indoor sporting facility. 


On November 24, the Tunapuna/Piarco Regional Corporation issued a “Stop Order Notice” on the company contracted to construct the facility, Synthesis Group Ltd, saying their application for approval from the corporation was missing key documents including a certificate of clearance (CEC) from the Environmental Management Authority (EMA). The group began the litigation in December last year, when High Court judge Ricky Rahim gave it leave to file for judicial review.


The group is being represented by Senior Counsel Fyard Hosein and attorney Rishi Dass. The next hearing will take place next Thursday.


User comments posted on this website are the sole views and opinions of the comment writer and are not representative of Guardian Media Limited or its staff.

Guardian Media Limited accepts no liability and will not be held accountable for user comments.

Guardian Media Limited reserves the right to remove, to edit or to censor any comments.

Any content which is considered unsuitable, unlawful or offensive, includes personal details, advertises or promotes products, services or websites or repeats previous comments will be removed.

Before posting, please refer to the Community Standards, Terms and conditions and Privacy Policy

User profiles registered through fake social media accounts may be deleted without notice.