Global Warming, Human Health and the Environment is the theme for this year’s bpTT Schools’ Environmental Awareness Competition, to start in May.
You are here
Woman on drug charge freed after retrial
Shirley Charles of Penal thanked Jesus, her attorneys and the nine-member jury yesterday after she was freed of a charge of trafficking 2.4 kilos of cocaine in 2008. Charles, 54, who was represented by Joel Roper and Gideon McMaster, wept and shouted, “Hallelujah! Thank you, Jesus, thank you, Lord,” and then wept in the Port-of-Spain Fifth Criminal Court. She was before a jury for the second time, after Appeal Court judges Stanley John, Paula Mae Weekes and Alice Soo Hon ordered a retrial in April 2009.
She had been sentenced to 15 years in jail one year prior by Justice Andre Mondesir. It was alleged that Charles, a housewife, tried to smuggle the drug into New York by hiding it in the lining of a suitcase. After deliberating for just over an hour the jury returned with a not-guilty verdict. Charles, on hearing the verdict, began crying and hugged McMaster. As the jury was being led out of the courtroom she thanked them and had to be stopped gently by presiding judge David Harris. Speaking to the media afterwards Charles again thanked God and expressed thanks to her church, family, friends and other well-wishers.
The State, which was represented by Tricia Hudlin-Cooper, called two witnesses in the case, which alleged that on September 6, 2002, PC Mc Donald of the Organised Crime and Narcotics Bureau (OCNU) was on duty at Piarco International Airport when he received certain information and stopped Charles. In the lining of her suitcase, he found a white powdery substance.
User comments posted on this website are the sole views and opinions of the comment writer and are not representative of Guardian Media Limited or its staff.
Guardian Media Limited accepts no liability and will not be held accountable for user comments.
Guardian Media Limited reserves the right to remove, to edit or to censor any comments.
Any content which is considered unsuitable, unlawful or offensive, includes personal details, advertises or promotes products, services or websites or repeats previous comments will be removed.