The Police Complaints Authority (PCA) has recommended that the former head of Special Branch be charged for his role in the alleged cover-up of the discovery of a quantity of marijuana at the...
You are here
Medical negligence a tough process
Student, Hugh Wooding Law School
Medical negligence occurs where an act or omission by a health care provider in providing treatment falls below the accepted standard of practice in the medical community, causing injury or death to the patient. Therefore, if you have been treated for a medical condition and because of that treatment you have suffered adverse effects you may have a medical negligence claim. To bring a claim for medical negligence the patient must prove four elements. These elements are:
Duty of care
The medical professional is held to a higher duty of care than that of the ordinary person. The early test for medical negligence, known as the ‘Bolam’ test, stated that a doctor “is not guilty of negligence if he/she has acted in accordance with the practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of medical opinion”.
A medical professional performing his/her duties in T&T is considered to be competent once acting in accordance with the rules and practices followed by the Medical Board Act Chap. 29:04 and other generally accepted practices.
Breach of duty of care
A medical professional must have breached a duty of care that he/she owed to the patient. Doctors can be found guilty of medical negligence, which is in essence a breach of a duty of care, for failed or delayed diagnosis, failure to warn of risks in treatment, among other things.
To prove medical negligence one must show actual or proximate cause. Proximate cause is the primary cause of an injury. To help determine this, the courts have developed the “but for” rule, which means that “but for” the medical professional’s negligent act or omission, the injury would not have occurred.
For example, “but for” the doctor leaving a sponge in the patient, the patient would not have developed an infection. This is known as legal causation. However, there may be other independent or intervening factors at play that can impact on the ultimate injury. To establish liability therefore, it must be shown that the negligent act was the actual or primary cause of the ultimate injury.
Injury and loss
Actual injury or loss must be proved by the patient to entitle him/her to an award of damages or compensation. There are two types of loss a person may seek to recover. Economic loss includes damages for the actual physical injury, medical expenses, compensation for lost work, etc. Non-economic losses are those that do not have a specific monetary loss associated with them, such as pain and suffering.
As with other negligence claims, a medical negligence claim in T&T must be brought within four years of the cause of action, as stated in the Limitation of Certain Actions Act Chap. 7:09. It is only when the patient is made aware of the negligence that the limitation period begins to run, as a doctor may have operated on a patient and may have been negligent but the patient does not become aware until later on.
This column is not legal advice. If you have a legal problem, you should consult a legal adviser. Co-ordinator: Roshan Ramcharitar
User comments posted on this website are the sole views and opinions of the comment writer and are not representative of Guardian Media Limited or its staff.
Guardian Media Limited accepts no liability and will not be held accountable for user comments.
Guardian Media Limited reserves the right to remove, to edit or to censor any comments.
Any content which is considered unsuitable, unlawful or offensive, includes personal details, advertises or promotes products, services or websites or repeats previous comments will be removed.