JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, July 18, 2025

EMA guarded on dangers of landfill fire

by

20140521

Smoke fil­ter­ing in­to the cap­i­tal city as a re­sult of the re­cent fires at the Beetham land­fill less­ened yes­ter­day while the En­vi­ron­ment Man­age­ment Au­thor­i­ty (EMA) con­tin­ues to guard the de­tails of the ex­act lev­els of pol­lu­tants in near­by ar­eas.The au­thor­i­ty yes­ter­day, how­ev­er, di­vulged which pol­lu­tants were be­ing checked and said the Draft Air Pol­lu­tion Rules were used as a bench­mark for the tests.

Man­ag­er of Emer­gency Re­sponse and In­ves­ti­ga­tion Ria Ra­moutar in a tele­phone in­ter­view said the EMA had done air mon­i­tor­ing for the pol­lu­tants which it felt would have been most per­ti­nent to the sit­u­a­tion.As such, the EMA me­ters were used to test lev­els of six of the over 30 sub­stances list­ed in the Draft Air Pol­lu­tion Rules, name­ly am­mo­nia, sul­phur diox­ide, car­bon monox­ide, ni­tro­gen diox­ide, hy­dro­gen sul­phide and volatile or­gan­ic com­pounds.

The au­thor­i­ty al­so con­duct­ed vi­su­al sur­veil­lance, pay­ing spe­cial at­ten­tion to "sen­si­tive ar­eas," such as Laven­tille, Sea Lots and down­town Port-of-Spain.De­spite the fact the EMA was work­ing as part of an in­ter-agency re­sponse team, in­clud­ing the Health Min­istry, Fire and Po­lice Ser­vices, the Of­fice of Dis­as­ter Pre­pared­ness and the Port-of-Spain and San Juan Laven­tille Re­gion­al Cor­po­ra­tions, spe­cif­ic de­tails of the air-mon­i­tor­ing tests were not shared with these or­gan­i­sa­tions.

"We shared our re­port with them," Ra­moutar said.Asked if the re­port in­clud­ed the re­sults of the lev­els of pol­lu­tants, Ra­moutar said no."All of the tests came back with low­er lev­els than the ac­cept­ed lim­its pro­vid­ed in the Draft Air Pol­lu­tion Rules," he added.

Chil­dren, se­nior cit­i­zen­sat risk–doc­tor

Pae­di­a­tri­cian Dr David Bratt told the T&T Guardian that se­nior cit­i­zens and chil­dren were at risk from the smoke in the city and said the EMA should be telling the pub­lic the pre­cise lev­els mea­sured."Se­nior cit­i­zens (over 65) and chil­dren (un­der 18) are at risk... se­niors for heart at­tacks and bron­chi­tis/pneu­mo­nia and pre­ma­ture death," Bratt said in an e-mail.

He said every­one else were at risk for si­nus, ear in­fec­tions, con­junc­tivi­tis, bron­chi­tis, pneu­mo­nia, bronchial asth­ma at­tacks and dis­or­ders of the res­pi­ra­to­ry tract, man­i­fest­ing ba­si­cal­ly in cough, chron­ic cough, spasms of cough, lead­ing to poor sleep, day­time ir­ri­tabil­i­ty, es­pe­cial­ly stu­dents.He said preg­nant women were es­pe­cial­ly at risk for pre­ma­ture labour and birth. He said peo­ple need­ed to "stay away from the ar­eas of pol­lu­tion.

"Don't send the chil­dren to school in Port-of-Spain. Don't go shop­ping down­town or wear a mask," he warned.

SWM­COL re­sponds

Com­mu­ni­ca­tions man­ag­er of the Sol­id Waste Man­age­ment Com­pa­ny Ltd (SWM­COL) George Elias said in a tele­phone in­ter­view yes­ter­day the fires were very close to be­ing com­plete­ly doused.

"We are not 100 per cent fin­ished but we are very close. The land­fill was re­opened on a lim­it­ed scale to­day (yes­ter­day)," Elias said.

Asked whether the EMA had pro­vid­ed SWM­COL, the com­pa­ny re­spon­si­ble for the land­fill, with a copy of the air qual­i­ty re­ports, Elias said he had not seen the re­port but as­sumed they would have done that.While Elias main­tained that an in­ves­ti­ga­tion in­to the cause of the fire had not been com­plet­ed, he said in­ves­ti­ga­tions had re­vealed they had been de­lib­er­ate­ly set.That sup­ports state­ments by En­vi­ron­ment Min­is­ter Gan­ga Singh on Tues­day that the fires were de­lib­er­ate­ly set.

How­ev­er, he said, the mo­tive for the fire re­mained un­der fur­ther in­ves­ti­ga­tion.The com­pa­ny dis­missed sug­ges­tions that SWM­COL stood to ben­e­fit from fires at the Beetham land­fill and said Cen­tral Gov­ern­ment was dis­cussing pro­pos­als to im­prove man­age­ment of the site.

The Draft Air Pol­lu­tion Rules state the fol­low­ing max­i­mum per­mis­si­ble lim­its in mil­ligrams (mg) for the pol­lu­tants mea­sured.

�2 Sul­phur diox­ide: 500.

�2 Car­bon monox­ide: 1,000.

�2 Ni­tro­gen diox­ide: 500.

�2 Am­mo­nia: 50.

�2 Hy­dro­gen sul­phide: 15.

�2Volatile or­gan­ic com­pound: 20.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored