JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, July 11, 2025

Building owner says safety claims wrong

by

20140711

Some of the health and safe­ty is­sues iden­ti­fied in the wide­ly-pub­li­cised Oc­cu­pa­tion­al Safe­ty and Health re­port for the Im­mi­gra­tion Di­vi­sion build­ing at 67 Fred­er­ick Street, Port-of-Spain, were ex­ag­ger­at­ed and false, ac­cord­ing to Al­fred Galy, prop­er­ty man­ag­er of the build­ing.He was seen yes­ter­day in and around the build­ing mak­ing checks with work­ers.In an in­ter­view af­ter­wards, Galy said: "There were a lot of mi­nor de­tails that were am­pli­fied. Os­ha has ex­ag­ger­at­ed this con­di­tion and I con­sid­er it very reck­less and un­pro­fes­sion­al."The build­ing is a func­tion­al build­ing. The el­e­va­tor is work­ing. There is no short­age of wa­ter. There are no elec­tri­cal prob­lems. The air was test­ed and it's prop­er air, bet­ter air than the air out­side."

Com­ment­ing on the is­sue of "hang­ing wires" through­out the build­ing, Galy said: "These were IT wires that could have been se­cured bet­ter but they gave the im­pres­sion that they were elec­tri­cal wires."On the is­sue of in­ad­e­quate ven­ti­la­tion, he said: "We have a re­port from Cariri that shows the air meets spec­i­fi­ca­tions so that is not cor­rect. That's an al­le­ga­tion."On the is­sue of the stair­case be­ing too nar­row, he said: "The stair­case met spec­i­fi­ca­tions at the time when the build­ing was built, which was 39 inch­es, and I think it's the same 39 inch­es now, and at the time it was ap­proved by town and coun­try and city coun­cil."On the is­sue of there be­ing no emer­gency light­ing, he said: "That is ab­solute­ly in­cor­rect and mis­lead­ing. New emer­gency light­ing was in­stalled two weeks ago and was test­ed by the fire au­thor­i­ties up to two days ago."I was nev­er even in­vit­ed when Os­ha con­duct­ed the in­spec­tion."

How­ev­er, Galy said there were some le­git­i­mate is­sues which were re­ceiv­ing his at­ten­tion. He said re­me­di­al work had start­ed on the build­ing and was ex­pect­ed to be 90 per cent com­plete with­in a week."Right now we are putting in place all the safe­ty and health con­cerns that the staff had. Every one of them that is true. If there are false ones we have noth­ing to do," he added.

He said the rel­e­vant cer­tifi­cates would be ready in a few days. Asked to re­spond to an al­le­ga­tion by Pub­lic Ser­vice As­so­ci­a­tion (PSA) pres­i­dent Wat­son Duke that a T&TEC fore­man was in­jured on the com­pound, he said:"There is an in­stal­la­tion to the back that be­longs to T&TEC. It's on our prop­er­ty but the in­stal­la­tion ser­vices a whole block of build­ings and it has not been prop­er­ly ser­viced and that's why it got out of hand. That's T&TEC's prob­lem, oth­er­wise they would have sued us."

Galy said he was in the process of get­ting elec­tri­cal cer­ti­fi­ca­tion."For elec­tri­cals, you are sup­posed to do your build­ing every five years. You call the in­spec­torate to do a test but we're do­ing that right now," he said.Asked why he did not main­tain the five-year cer­ti­fi­ca­tion, he added; "The build­ing was run­ning. We had no elec­tri­cal prob­lems. How many peo­ple do that? Who­ev­er owns hous­es don't do that every five years."Con­tact­ed by the T&T Guardian yes­ter­day, the two Os­ha in­spec­tors iden­ti­fied on the re­port said they were not al­lowed to com­ment. Chief In­spec­tor Gaek­wad Ra­moutar re­quest­ed that all ques­tions be sent via e-mail. How­ev­er, he had not re­spond­ed up to yes­ter­day evening.

Duke's Re­sponse

Duke's re­sponse

Asked at a press con­fer­ence yes­ter­day if he was con­cerned about the au­then­tic­i­ty of the Os­ha re­port, PSA pres­i­dent Duke said: "I am not con­cerned be­cause that re­port was done in broad day­light with mem­bers of staff. We have a big­ger fight than what ap­pears on pa­per."We have a se­ri­ous con­cern that the Min­is­ter of Labour, be­ing the min­is­ter re­spon­si­ble for the In­dus­tri­al Court and the OSH agen­cies, and yet the min­is­ter who is mak­ing de­c­la­ra­tions on his own ac­count, quite con­trary to these in­de­pen­dent bod­ies, that the com­plaints spo­ken about are friv­o­lous where­as the in­spec­tor would have said those com­plaints are grave and could threat­en life, health, and a per­son's safe­ty."He's go­ing against an in­de­pen­dent body which falls un­der his charge."

Duke added: "You have a min­is­ter ridi­cul­ing the in­tegri­ty of pub­lic of­fi­cers. How could he say a 'so called' OSH re­port when it came from some­one un­der his charge."He said sev­er­al im­mi­gra­tion of­fi­cers had made med­ical com­plaints, con­trary to what Labour Min­is­ter Er­rol Mc Leod had said."As a mat­ter of fact, that is why the Moo­nan Build­ing (the im­mi­gra­tion build­ing op­po­site St Mary's Col­lege) had been shut down since April 8. Just to­day an im­mi­gra­tion of­fi­cer com­plained of now hav­ing to seek spe­cial­ist treat­ment," he added.Duke called on Gov­ern­ment to es­tab­lish an over­sight com­mit­tee, com­pris­ing five PSA mem­bers and five mem­bers of the state, to look in­to the work­ing con­di­tions of im­mi­gra­tion staff and over­see the move from the cur­rent build­ings to the Gov­ern­ment Cam­pus Plaza.Asked how the PSA will re­spond if the Gov­ern­ment moved to in­tro­duce con­tempt pro­ceed­ings, Duke said: "We will re­spond in the way we feel best."


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored