JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, July 19, 2025

As dissenting reform bill voices grow, AG knocks Hodge

by

20140808

At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Anand Ram­lo­gan has dis­missed al­le­ga­tions by Con­sti­tu­tion Re­form Com­mis­sion (CRC) mem­ber Dr Mer­le Hodge that the con­tro­ver­sial runoff bal­lot pro­posed in the Con­sti­tu­tion­al (Amend­ment) Bill 2014 was not part of the dis­cus­sion dur­ing the com­mis­sion's in­ter­ac­tion with the pub­lic or in its re­port.

In a let­ter sent to the me­dia late Thurs­day, Hodge, au­thor, ac­tivist and re­tired Uni­ver­si­ty of the West In­dies (UWI) lec­tur­er, called on the Gov­ern­ment to hold its hand on the bill and de­scribed the runoff polls for MPs pro­posed in the draft leg­is­la­tion as "an­ti-de­mo­c­ra­t­ic" and a con­tra­dic­tion of "the prin­ci­ple of pro­por­tion­al rep­re­sen­ta­tion."

But speak­ing a press con­fer­ence at his St Vin­cent Street, Port-of-Spain of­fice yes­ter­day, Ram­lo­gan ques­tioned the ba­sis for Hodge's crit­i­cism, as he said the pro­vi­sion was in­deed part of a re­port to Gov­ern­ment pre­pared by the com­mis­sion."One would ex­pect and hope that be­fore they put their sig­na­tures on that doc­u­ment there would have been ma­ture re­flec­tion, care­ful de­lib­er­a­tion and gen­uine dis­cus­sion amongst these per­sons who were ap­point­ed and paid, I might add, to serve on that com­mis­sion," Ram­lo­gan said.

Ram­lo­gan al­so sug­gest­ed Hodge's state­ment might have been mo­ti­vat­ed by her per­son­al po­lit­i­cal views."It's a mat­ter of pub­lic record that Mrs (sic) Hodge was a sup­port­er of Win­ston Dook­er­an while I was part of the Con­gress of the Peo­ple (COP), be­cause she ap­peared on the plat­form in sup­port of Mr Dook­er­an."I don't know if there is any mer­it to the claim that this is a hang­over from the in­ter­nal elec­tion cam­paign in 2010 that did not go too well for the Dook­er­an fac­tion as op­posed to the Ra­mad­har fac­tion," Ram­lo­gan said.

The AG re­it­er­at­ed his sup­port for the leg­is­la­tion, which he said was long over­due, as the rec­om­men­da­tions of sev­er­al oth­er sim­i­lar com­mis­sions had been ig­nored by pre­vi­ous gov­ern­ments for the past 40 years.

The pro­vi­sion was first re­vealed ear­li­er this week by Prime Min­is­ter Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar when she tabled the leg­is­la­tion, which al­so in­cludes a two-term lim­it for prime min­is­ters and right of re­call for MPs, dur­ing her pre­sen­ta­tion at the open­ing of the fifth and fi­nal ses­sion of the tenth Par­lia­ment. The bill is to be de­bat­ed on Mon­day.

If passed by a sim­ply ma­jor­i­ty in Par­lia­ment, MPs who win by less than 50 per cent of votes cast in the con­stituen­cy will have to par­tic­i­pate in a runoff poll. The sec­ondary poll will take place with­in two weeks of the main elec­tion, with vot­ers de­cid­ing be­tween the two can­di­dates who re­ceived the most votes in the ini­tial count.

MPs will be vul­ner­a­ble

Ram­lo­gan said the runoff polls were a di­rect and log­i­cal con­se­quence of the pro­posed re­call of non-per­form­ing MPs and was need­ed to com­ple­ment it."You can­not give a right of re­call with so many MPs elect­ed with a mi­nor­i­ty of the votes cast. They will be vul­ner­a­ble to be re­called," Ram­lo­gan said.Ques­tioned on the pos­si­bil­i­ty that few­er vot­ers might par­tic­i­pate in the runoff poll as op­posed to the ini­tial gen­er­al elec­tion, Ram­lo­gan said it was un­like­ly.

"We are yet to find such a case in the world from our re­search. It is al­ways you get a larg­er turnout," he said.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored