JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, July 9, 2025

PM still goes ahead

by

20140808

Amid con­fir­ma­tion that some Con­gress of the Peo­ple (COP) MPs have raised con­cerns in Cab­i­net about Gov­ern­ment's runoff poll pro­pos­al, COP MP Car­olyn Seep­er­sad-Bachan yes­ter­day re­buked cer­tain re­marks by At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Anand Ram­lo­gan about Con­sti­tu­tion­al Re­form Com­mis­sion mem­ber Dr Mer­le Hodge's views on the is­sue.

In­for­ma­tion reach­ing T&T Guardian is that con­cerns on the pro­posed runoff poll were raised in Cab­i­net weeks ago - ahead of an­nounce­ment of the plan in Par­lia­ment on Mon­day - and up to Thurs­day al­so.Hodge was part of the CRC which made con­sti­tu­tion­al re­form rec­om­men­da­tions, hold­ing pub­lic con­sul­ta­tions since last year. A re­port was sub­mit­ted in De­cem­ber 2013 and an ad­den­dum to the re­port on Ju­ly 18.

The CRC, head­ed by COP leader Prakash Ra­mad­har, al­so in­clud­ed Madam Jus­tice Am­ri­ka Ti­wary-Red­dy, Jus­tice Se­bas­t­ian Ven­tour, Dr. Hamid Ghany and To­bag­on­ian busi­ness en­tre­pre­neur Car­los Dil­lon.

In Mon­day's ad­dress to Par­lia­ment on the con­sti­tu­tion­al re­form pro­pos­als, Prime Min­is­ter Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar said mat­ters for CRC con­sid­er­a­tion in­clud­ed lim­i­ta­tions on terms of ser­vice by the prime min­is­ter, a right of re­call in re­spect of non-per­form­ing Par­lia­men­tary rep­re­sen­ta­tives, "re­spect­ing the voic­es of the mi­nori­ties whilst giv­ing ef­fect to the will of the ma­jor­i­ty, mak­ing every vote count" and al­so for pro­vi­sion for fixed dates for gen­er­al elec­tions.

Per­sad-Bisses­sar on Mon­day al­so an­nounced pro­posed leg­is­la­tion, to be de­bat­ed in Par­lia­ment Mon­day, con­cern­ing two-term lim­its for prime min­is­ters, right of re­call for MPs and the runoff poll sys­tem to ap­ply where can­di­dates re­ceived less than 50 per cent of votes cast.The is­sue trig­gered neg­a­tive feed­back from var­i­ous quar­ters, in­clud­ing the Op­po­si­tion.

Some quar­ters of the pub­lic have ar­gued that the runoff pool pro­pos­al will in fact fur­ther en­trench a two-par­ty sys­tem and kill off the chances of small par­ties like the In­de­pen­dent Lib­er­al Par­ty (ILP), Move­ment for So­cial Jus­tice (MSJ) and even the COP.In a let­ter to the me­dia Thurs­day night, Hodge said the runoff pro­pos­al was in not in the PP's man­i­festo, or in main con­sti­tu­tion­al re­form con­sul­ta­tions around T&T, or the Com­mis­sion's re­port.

Dis­as­so­ci­at­ing her­self from the par­tic­u­lar pro­pos­al, Hodge added, "What the cur­rent dis­cus­sion proves is that be­fore it is tak­en to the fi­nal stage in Par­lia­ment, this Bill needs more and deep­er scruti­ny by the pub­lic, na­tion­wide, over a longer pe­ri­od than one week."Yes­ter­day, CRC mem­ber Dil­lon al­so echoed the call to Gov­ern­ment to hold off on de­bate.

2nd CRC mem­ber wants hold on move

Con­sti­tu­tion­al Re­form Com­mis­sion (CRC) mem­ber Car­los Dil­lon has be­come the sec­ond mem­ber of the body call­ing on Gov­ern­ment to hold its hand on the Con­sti­tu­tion (Amend­ment) Bill 2014.In a state­ment yes­ter­day, Dil­lon said as a mem­ber of the com­mis­sion, whose re­mit was to "co-or­di­nate the con­sul­ta­tion ses­sions" through­out the coun­try and to sub­mit a re­port, he took re­spon­si­bil­i­ty for the re­port, which was sub­se­quent­ly put out for pub­lic com­ment.

Dil­lon added, "In my view, the main con­cerns of the cit­i­zen­ry at this time in­clude the right of re­call of an MP, the method­ol­o­gy to be used for putting pro­por­tion­al rep­re­sen­ta­tion in­to ef­fect and the tim­ing of bring­ing the bill to Par­lia­ment."The right of re­call of an MP and the ques­tion of pro­por­tion­al rep­re­sen­ta­tion were in­deed raised by the pub­lic dur­ing the con­sul­ta­tions and are re­flect­ed in the re­port.

"How­ev­er, the meth­ods of putting the right of re­call and the method­ol­o­gy for ef­fect­ing PR were not part of the pub­lic dis­cus­sion, for ac­cep­tance/re­jec­tion."Dil­lon said the tim­ing of bring­ing the bill to Par­lia­ment was not the func­tion of the com­mis­sion."As a con­se­quence of the furore sur­round­ing the bill," he sug­gest­ed, "good sense should pre­vail and that the tim­ing of de­bate on such a most im­por­tant mat­ter be looked at again."

CRC mem­ber Am­ri­ka Ti­wary-Red­dy, de­clin­ing com­ment on the pub­lic de­bate yes­ter­day, said she con­sid­ered the CRC's job done.She said the CRC had lis­tened to the pub­lic's re­spons­es and many meet­ings were held. Any queries should be ad­dressed to the CRC chair­man Prakash Ra­mad­har, she said.CRC mem­bers Dr Hamid Ghany and Jus­tice Se­bastien Ven­tour could not be reached for com­ment yes­ter­day.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored