JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, July 11, 2025

Axe the Praks

by

20140825

Hours be­fore Sen­a­tors were set to de­bate the Con­sti­tu­tion (Amend­ment) Bill 2014 in the up­per House to­day, a small group of Con­gress of the Peo­ple (COP) mem­bers placed an "X" over the par­ty's lo­gos on their t-shirts and raised plac­ards to protest the runoff pro­vi­sion of the bill.The protest took place dur­ing a pan­el dis­cus­sion on the bill at the Hi­malaya Club in Barataria, when four mem­bers of the COP left their seats to re­trieve plac­ards that were in op­po­si­tion to the runoff po­si­tion.

The plac­ards bore state­ments like "Axe the Praks," "Sen­a­tors must say no to runoff," "Run-off a dag­ger in the heart of the COP," "Prakash the Be­tray­er" and "Sen­a­tors 'do so' to the Run Off."The protest group was led by Rudolph Hanamji.The protest, which was most­ly silent, be­gan dur­ing a pre­sen­ta­tion by Bar­ba­di­an po­lit­i­cal an­a­lyst Pe­ter Wick­ham, af­ter he de­scribed Prime Min­is­ter Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar as the on­ly Caribbean leader sit­ting who was will­ing to give up pow­er.

He said, how­ev­er, that is was un­for­tu­nate that T&T was hav­ing the dis­cus­sion of con­sti­tu­tion­al re­form in the con­text of one par­ty ver­sus an­oth­er."T&T has sac­ri­ficed the op­por­tu­ni­ty to have an adult con­ver­sa­tion on con­sti­tu­tion­al change," Wick­ham said.Wick­ham's com­ments fol­lowed a tone of pos­i­tive views on the bill, which was on­ly di­rect­ly op­posed by vet­er­an jour­nal­ist Suni­ty Ma­haraj.

Ma­haraj, who made it clear she did not sup­port the pop­u­lar view of the pan­el, said she could not sup­port any leg­is­la­tion which did not stem from prop­er process.Not­ing that the runoff pro­vi­sion was added to the bill with­out con­sul­ta­tion, Ma­haraj said she was in com­plete op­po­si­tion of the bill. She added that as the COP's gen­er­al coun­cil had tak­en a po­si­tion to have the de­bate of the bill de­layed the day be­fore it was de­bate in the low­er House, the par­ty's leader Prakash Ra­mad­har had gone rogue.

"How can you talk about the COP hav­ing pow­er when this bill was not even dis­cussed with the COP be­fore it was vot­ed up­on? Ma­haraj asked."When the COP can give an in­struc­tion to its leader and for all I see, the COP's leader has gone rogue."Ma­haraj said the con­science vote al­lowed by Per­sad-Bisses­sar could not ex­plain Ra­mad­har's vote."The con­science vote did not re­lease the leader of the COP from the in­struc­tions his par­ty gave him," she said.

She said while Gov­ern­ment was send­ing a mes­sage of giv­ing pow­er to the peo­ple, this could not be done with a flawed process."You can­not plant au­toc­ra­cy and preach democ­ra­cy."In­di­ra Ram­per­sad, a lec­tur­er at the Uni­ver­si­ty of the West In­dies, said the bill al­lowed for even the prime min­is­ter to be re­called and said it would lead to peo­ple-cen­tred gov­ern­ment.

She said while there had been calls for pro­por­tion­al rep­re­sen­ta­tion, this was not al­ways the best for­mu­la and gave the ex­am­ple of a hung Par­lia­ment in Guyana as a re­sult of that sys­tem.Ram­per­sad al­so ex­pressed fear that if con­sti­tu­tion­al re­form did not hap­pen now, it would nev­er hap­pen.This was neg­a­tive­ly re­ceived by mem­bers of the crowd who vo­cif­er­ous­ly asked for ev­i­dence to sup­port this.

The runoff pro­vi­sion fa­cil­i­tates a sec­ond elec­tion if no can­di­date is able to gar­ner more than 50 per cent of votes in an ini­tial elec­tion.On­ly the two par­ties with the most votes will be el­i­gi­ble to run in sec­ond elec­tion to be held with­in 15 days of the gen­er­al elec­tion.But sev­er­al sec­tors of the pub­lic have spo­ken out against this mea­sure, say­ing it was not dis­cussed dur­ing the pub­lic fo­rums on con­sti­tu­tion­al re­form.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored