JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, May 19, 2025

Law Made Sim­ple

The Extradition Process

by

20160117

Re­bec­ca Du­rant Stu­dent, Hugh Wood­ing Law School

What is Ex­tra­di­tion?

Ex­tra­di­tion is the le­gal process by which one coun­try (the re­quest­ed state) re­turns a per­son ac­cused or con­vict­ed of an ex­tra­ditable of­fence in an­oth­er coun­try (the re­quest­ing state) to that coun­try to stand tri­al for the al­leged of­fence.

In T&T this process is gov­erned by the Ex­tra­di­tion (Com­mon­wealth and For­eign Ter­ri­to­ries) Act No 36 of 1985 (the Act).

It is a com­mon mis­con­cep­tion that ex­tra­di­tion pro­ceed­ings de­ter­mine guilt or in­no­cence. They on­ly de­ter­mine whether it is rea­son­able for an in­di­vid­ual to face tri­al abroad.

The Re­quest

A re­quest can be made to the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al by any state with which there is an ex­tra­di­tion agree­ment. There are 51 Com­mon­wealth states to which the Act specif­i­cal­ly ap­plies. Ad­di­tion­al­ly, there are treaties with the Unit­ed States and sev­er­al oth­er coun­tries fa­cil­i­tat­ing ex­tra­di­tion.

A re­quest must con­tain:

�2 a de­scrip­tion of the in­di­vid­ual;

�2 an out­line of the facts and the law on which the re­quest is based;

�2 a war­rant is­sued for the in­di­vid­ual in the re­quest­ing state; and

�2 a sum­ma­ry of the ev­i­dence against the in­di­vid­ual or ev­i­dence of their con­vic­tion.

Once sat­is­fied with the re­quest the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al will then is­sue an "Au­thor­i­ty to Pro­ceed" in re­spect of the re­quest and it is sent to a mag­is­trate.

The mag­is­trate can is­sue a war­rant for the in­di­vid­ual's ar­rest once sat­is­fied that if an­oth­er per­son com­mit­ted the of­fence with­in T&T, the ev­i­dence pro­vid­ed would or­di­nar­i­ly jus­ti­fy is­su­ing an ar­rest war­rant. The in­di­vid­ual can choose to con­sent to the ex­tra­di­tion and be re­turned to the re­quest­ing state. Oth­er­wise the case is ar­gued be­fore a mag­is­trate.

Hear­ing be­fore a Mag­is­trate

In or­der to com­mit the in­di­vid­ual for ex­tra­di­tion the mag­is­trate must be sat­is­fied that:

�2 The of­fence is ex­tra­ditable;

�2 The in­di­vid­ual has been prop­er­ly iden­ti­fied; and

�2 Ev­i­dence shows the of­fence was com­mit­ted on a bal­ance of prob­a­bil­i­ties (this is low­er than the usu­al crim­i­nal stan­dard of be­yond a rea­son­able doubt).

Dur­ing this hear­ing the mag­is­trate has the dis­cre­tion to grant bail at the re­quest of the in­di­vid­ual once sat­is­fied that they won't flee.

Ex­tra­ditable of­fences

An of­fence is ex­tra­ditable once it is an of­fence in both the re­quest­ing and re­quest­ed states; and pun­ish­able with at least 12 months im­pris­on­ment or death. Al­ter­na­tive­ly, an agree­ment or treaty can spec­i­fy of­fences which are to be ex­tra­ditable.

Bars to Ex­tra­di­tion

Ex­tra­di­tion will not be or­dered where:

�2 The of­fence is po­lit­i­cal;

�2 An of­fence is be­ing used as a cov­er to pun­ish the in­di­vid­ual for his race, re­li­gion, gen­der, sex­u­al pref­er­ence, na­tion­al­i­ty or po­lit­i­cal opin­ions;

�2 The tri­al will be prej­u­diced be­cause of the in­di­vid­ual's race, re­li­gion, gen­der, sex­u­al pref­er­ence, na­tion­al­i­ty or po­lit­i­cal opin­ions; or

�2 The in­di­vid­ual has been ac­quit­ted or con­vict­ed and served his sen­tence in re­spect of the same of­fence.

Dis­cre­tion to Refuse Ex­tra­di­tion

De­ci­sions made can be sub­ject to re­view by the High Court in habeas cor­pus or ju­di­cial re­view pro­ceed­ings.

Among the fac­tors the court will con­sid­er in re­fus­ing ex­tra­di­tion are: the triv­ial na­ture of the of­fence, the pas­sage of time since the of­fence, that the re­quest was made in bad faith, in­di­vid­ual rights as against in­ter­na­tion­al co­op­er­a­tion or any oth­er suf­fi­cient cause, mak­ing it un­just and op­pres­sive to re­turn the in­di­vid­ual.

The AG can al­so refuse ex­tra­di­tion on the same grounds. No­tably, ex­tra­di­tion can be re­fused where the of­fence could at­tract the death penal­ty in the re­quest­ing state but would not in T&T.Al­though T&T al­lows ex­tra­di­tion in re­spect of death penal­ty of­fences, it is lim­it­ed in this re­gard.

Ap­peals

An in­di­vid­ual has the right to ap­peal ex­tra­di­tion pro­ceed­ings all the way to the Privy Coun­cil.

This col­umn is not le­gal ad­vice. If you have a le­gal prob­lem, you should con­sult a le­gal ad­vis­er. Co-or­di­na­tor: Roshan Ram­char­i­tar


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored