JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, August 28, 2025

AG rub­bish­es Mooni­lal's calls to quit over gun is­sue

No reason to go

by

20161014

At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Faris Al-Rawi says he isn't the sub­ject of any po­lice probe–con­cern­ing pic­tures of young­sters hold­ing high-pow­ered weapons–and he's not re­sign­ing.

The AG made that clear yes­ter­day, fol­low­ing re­newed Op­po­si­tion calls for his res­ig­na­tion af­ter it was con­firmed po­lice are now prob­ing the is­sue of the pic­tures of young­sters, al­leged to be Al-Rawi's chil­dren, hold­ing the weapons.

Unit­ed Na­tion­al Con­gress MP Roodal Mooni­lal, who re­vealed the pic­tures in Par­lia­ment on Tues­day, had writ­ten the act­ing Po­lice Com­mis­sion­er, De­fence Force head and Di­rec­tor of Pub­lic Pros­e­cu­tions call­ing for the probe.

In his de­fence, Al-Rawi had said his fam­i­ly was in­vit­ed by the De­fence Force for a "threat as­sess­ment" af­ter he re­ceived death threats last year.The De­fence Force al­so con­firmed it had in­vit­ed Al-Rawi and his fam­i­ly to Camp Cu­mu­to for train­ing. But Mooni­lal has coun­tered that it is il­le­gal for weapons to be in mi­nors' pos­ses­sion and "some­one" had to be ac­count­able.

How­ev­er, le­gal sources yes­ter­day point­ed the T&T Guardian to Sec­tion 5 of the Firearm Act on peo­ple deemed to be in pos­ses­sion of such weapons "in the ab­sence of any law­ful ex­cuse." They said the lat­ter clause was the end of the mat­ter con­cern­ing the pic­tures. They said the act's sec­tions would ex­plain why pic­tures of chil­dren hold­ing guns have ap­peared on the pages of lo­cal news­pa­pers.

Yes­ter­day, af­ter the po­lice con­firmed a probe was be­ing done on the pic­tures, Mooni­lal called on Al-Rawi to re­sign, or for the Prime Min­is­ter to re­move him in the same way the PM re­moved the Peo­ple's Na­tion­al Move­ment's Mar­lene Mc­Don­ald as a min­is­ter in March when she be­came the sub­ject of po­lice and In­tegri­ty Com­mis­sion probes on sev­er­al is­sues.

Mooni­lal added, "I'm sat­is­fied the Com­mis­sion­er has act­ed on my re­quest. In the cir­cum­stances, the Prime Min­is­ter has lit­tle choice but to re­move the AG pend­ing out­come of the probe, as he set this prece­dent with Mc­Don­ald. There's no fun­da­men­tal dif­fer­ence be­tween both min­is­ters.

"The AG has to re­sign since he's tit­u­lar head of the Bar and a law en­force­ment min­is­ter who deals with the po­lice, army and sim­i­lar agen­cies. Con­flict of in­ter­est will arise be­tween his po­si­tion and the De­fence Force and po­lice probes. There's an is­sue be­fore Cab­i­net for ex­ten­sion of the tenure of DF head Rod­ney Smart. With the DF probe in­to the pic­tures on­go­ing, the AG can­not sit in Cab­i­net on this."

How­ev­er, Al-Rawi, in Lon­don for meet­ings with the British DPP and Pub­lic De­fend­er on T&T is­sues, coun­tered, "I'm not the sub­ject of any po­lice probe/in­quiry. Nor could I pos­si­bly be the sub­ject of any such, as I have noth­ing to an­swer. I've noth­ing to wor­ry about, as this is a pur­pose­ful at­tempt by Mooni­lal, who's twist­ing facts, al­le­ga­tions and lies in­to one ma­trix."

Not­ing he hasn't con­firmed the young­sters in the pic­tures are his chil­dren, Al-Rawi said what the army did in re­la­tion to the chil­dren "...is some­thing for the army–I have no po­si­tion on that."

He said while the army was with his chil­dren at Camp Cu­mu­to, he and PNM MP Stu­art Young were in an­oth­er area.

"I haven't giv­en any po­si­tion on this main­ly be­cause it will ad­dress se­cu­ri­ty is­sues re­gard­ing my fam­i­ly, which I will not put in­to the pub­lic do­main, bait­ed–and ex­posed to risk–by some­one I con­sid­er to be a poor piece of hu­man­i­ty," Al-Rawi said.

"Peo­ple have sent me umpteen im­ages of T&T kids in cus­tody of po­lice and army hold­ing weapons. Dr Mooni­lal can't pro­duce any­thing to prove his claim the im­ages came from Face­book. I can­not be­lieve his claim a rel­a­tive of mine post­ed it."

On con­flict of in­ter­est with the De­fence Force and po­lice probes, Al-Rawi said, "How do any mat­ters (for Cab­i­net) re­late to any­thing that con­cerns the pic­tures and the De­fence Force. It shows his ig­no­rance of the law and com­mon sense. He doesn't sit in Cab­i­net. How could he know what is on the agen­da?"

Al-Rawi, who is al­so at­tend­ing a Paris meet­ing of the Fi­nan­cial Ac­tion Task Force, re­turns next week.

In a re­lease on Thurs­day, the De­fence Force con­firmed they had host­ed Al-Rawi and his fam­i­ly at Camp Cu­mu­to af­ter death threats were is­sued to the AG. It al­so con­firmed a probe in­to how the pho­tos of the chil­dren were leaked.

In ex­plain­ing what tran­spired then, Se­nior Pub­lic Af­fairs Of­fi­cer of the De­fence Force, Ma­jor Al Alexan­der, said none of Al-Rawi fam­i­ly took part in the ex­er­cise. Rather, he said they were there to ob­serve what is done in emer­gency sit­u­a­tions.

Alexan­der ad­mit­ted, how­ev­er, that the chil­dren dis­played "a cer­tain lev­el of cu­rios­i­ty" and were al­lowed to in­ter­act with the weapons.

"In our per­spec­tive, these are weapons that in emer­gen­cies would have to be used. We don't want chil­dren be­ing shell shocked and freez­ing when they need to move. It was re­al­ly to re­move the fear and ap­pre­hen­sion. We al­lowed them to hold it (gun)."

He said strict su­per­vi­sion was ad­hered to and the "mag­a­zines were emp­tied."


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored