Senior Reporter
jensen.lavende@guardian.co.tt
Political analyst Dr Bishnu Ragoonath says the expanded responsibilities placed on some ministers did not necessarily translate into a significantly heavier workload, since much of the technical and administrative work of Government was carried out by public officers.
Responding to the realignment of Cabinet responsibilities made by the Prime Minister, Ragoonath explained that ministers were primarily responsible for policy direction, while technical advisers, assistants and other staff handled the day-to-day work of their respective ministries.
“Ministers don’t really do the work. Ministers are advised and ministers make policy decisions and so on. They’re not going out there to do any major, anything by themselves.”
He pointed out that the same technical staff responsible for the various areas would continue carrying out that work, even when responsibility for a portfolio shifted to another minister.
“So when you talk about realignment and ministers getting a lot more portfolios and more responsibilities and so on, it’s just that the same staff who were doing it before probably will continue to do it. It’s just that they’re now reporting to a different minister, that’s all.”
Ragoonath acknowledged that, on paper, Land and Legal Affairs Minister Saddam Hosein had considerably more responsibilities.
“Yes, on paper, he has a lot more on his portfolio to be in charge of.”
Ragoonath also pointed to the interconnected nature of Government ministries, with policies in one area often having implications for several others.
“No ministry operates in a silo. Every ministry is interconnected with other ministries. And every policy perspective is interrelated.”
He explained that moving responsibilities between ministries could allow related areas of policy to interact more closely.
Analyst Dr Shane Mohammed said the realignment is in keeping with the Prime Minister’s first term in office and follows her governing ethos of streamlining policies.
“The alignment that the Prime Minister is doing is not inconsistent to Kamla 1.0. And I have an appreciation for Kamla 1.0’s consistency in realignment. It’s not about reshuffling; it’s easy to reshuffle people.”
He added: “Her purpose for realigning was to ensure that there was to ensure that government services is not left behind.”
He said the attention to land management is one main reason for the realignment and with her Government ministers, particularly Saddam Hosein, having a legal background, the added responsibilities to him, makes practical sense.
“We really and truly have always needed to start looking at government from a real governance perspective as it aligns to getting things done in a process orientation so that one intersects with the other.”
