JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, July 13, 2025

Analysts agree with Govt concerns over Independent Senators

by

Dareece Polo
12 days ago
20250701

DA­REECE PO­LO

Se­nior Re­porter

da­reece.po­lo@guardian.co.tt

Two po­lit­i­cal an­a­lysts are back­ing the Gov­ern­ment’s con­cerns about the so-called in­de­pen­dence of sen­a­tors ap­point­ed by the Pres­i­dent. But a for­mer In­de­pen­dent Sen­a­tor who faced the re­buke of Unit­ed Na­tion­al Con­gress pub­lic re­la­tions of­fi­cer, Dr Kirk Meighoo, is dis­miss­ing his crit­i­cism as base­less.

Cit­ing a re­cent rul­ing by Sen­ate Pres­i­dent Wade Mark, po­lit­i­cal sci­en­tist Prof Hamid Ghany not­ed that while pub­lic com­men­tary on past votes is fair, spec­u­lat­ing on fu­ture votes is in­ap­pro­pri­ate.

He was re­spond­ing to Meighoo’s com­ments at the UNC’s head­quar­ters on Sun­day that if at least four In­de­pen­dent sen­a­tors do not sup­port the Prime Min­is­ter’s Pen­sion (Amend­ment) Bill, 2025 “they will ac­tu­al­ly al­low the PNM to con­tin­ue to rape the Trea­sury, even in Op­po­si­tion.”

“To sug­gest that you could try to in­tim­i­date them on votes that they are go­ing to take in the fu­ture, I agree with the Pres­i­dent of the Sen­ate that you re­al­ly shouldn’t,” the po­lit­i­cal sci­en­tist said.

How­ev­er, Ghany re­mains dis­turbed by the ap­par­ent flip-flop­ping by In­de­pen­dent Sen­a­tors which he said chal­lenges their cred­i­bil­i­ty and po­ten­tial­ly un­der­mines pub­lic per­cep­tion of neu­tral­i­ty. Last Fri­day, the Up­per House vot­ed on the Trinidad and To­ba­go Rev­enue Au­thor­i­ty (Re­peal) Bill in the com­mit­tee stage where six in­de­pen­dent sen­a­tors ab­stained in­clud­ing Se­nior Coun­sel An­tho­ny Vieira, De­oroop Teemal, Michael Si­mon Vic­tor de la Bastide, Can­dice Jones-Sim­mons, Fran­cis Lewis and Ali­cia Pauline Lalite-Et­ti­enne.

Dr De­sirée Mur­ray, Court­ney Mc Nish and tem­po­rary in­de­pen­dent sen­a­tor Zo­la Phillips vot­ed yes. Rough­ly sev­en min­utes lat­er, by the end of the Com­mit­tee Stage, eight In­de­pen­dent Sen­a­tors had changed their po­si­tions.

Ghany de­clined to spec­u­late on the sen­a­tors’ mo­tives but he em­pha­sised that their votes car­ry weight and their be­hav­iour war­rants scruti­ny.

“I’m very trou­bled about these ‘pres­i­den­tial sen­a­tors’ mak­ing one de­ci­sion in Com­mit­tee Stage and sev­en or eight min­utes lat­er chang­ing it from yes to no, or from ab­stain to no.

“I have nev­er seen sen­a­tors change their vote from com­mit­tee stage to the fi­nal vote in such a short space of time.”

Weigh­ing in on the in­de­pen­dence of sen­a­tors ap­point­ed by the Pres­i­dent, po­lit­i­cal an­a­lyst Win­ford James re­it­er­at­ed pre­vi­ous calls for con­sti­tu­tion­al re­form, ad­vo­cat­ing for a shift to a di­rect­ly elect­ed ex­ec­u­tive pres­i­den­cy to en­sure re­al in­de­pen­dence in crit­i­cal ap­point­ments.

He re­called that for­mer prime min­is­ter Patrick Man­ning had pro­posed sim­i­lar re­forms, which were echoed in the find­ings of a Na­tion­al Ad­vi­so­ry Com­mit­tee on Con­sti­tu­tion­al Re­form es­tab­lished un­der the Dr Kei­th Row­ley-led ad­min­is­tra­tion.

James said the ac­tions of the in­de­pen­dent bench have raised valid ques­tions about ob­jec­tiv­i­ty.

“We need to elim­i­nate the sus­pi­cion that peo­ple ap­point­ed to the Pres­i­den­tial of­fice, peo­ple ap­point­ed as in­de­pen­dent sen­a­tors, are act­ing as true in­de­pen­dents. Not that you want to wipe out all of the sus­pi­cions that we have here, but at least you’re go­ing to get greater fair­ness, greater ob­jec­tiv­i­ty, than what the cur­rent ap­point­ment process gen­er­ates. What it gen­er­ates is a kind of con­fu­sion.”

For­mer sen­a­tor hits back

For­mer In­de­pen­dent Sen­a­tor and at­tor­ney Hazel Thomp­son-Ahye yes­ter­day pushed back against crit­i­cism from the UNC’s PRO, call­ing it “non­sen­si­cal” to judge a sen­a­tor’s in­de­pen­dence based sole­ly on how of­ten they vote with the Gov­ern­ment.

“It is non­sen­si­cal to judge the in­de­pen­dence of a sen­a­tor by the num­ber of times he/ she has vot­ed with the Gov­ern­ment. That vote, many times, would have come af­ter care­ful con­sid­er­a­tion by the Sen­a­tor of the word­ing of the leg­is­la­tion and by use­ful sug­ges­tions made to im­prove the leg­is­la­tion to ac­cord with le­gal prin­ci­ples.”

The at­tor­ney was re­spond­ing to the UNC PRO, who high­light­ed that dur­ing her tenure from 2018 to 2025, she vot­ed 14 out of 16 times in favour of the PNM ad­min­is­tra­tion.

Thomp­son-Ahye in­sist­ed her record in Par­lia­ment demon­strates her in­de­pen­dence, point­ing to nu­mer­ous oc­ca­sions where she open­ly crit­i­cised the gov­ern­ment.

“I have come to Par­lia­ment and chas­tised the gov­ern­ment for the low age of crim­i­nal re­spon­si­bil­i­ty, for not hav­ing laws on sex­u­al ha­rass­ment, for fail­ure to ad­here to the Con­ven­tion on the rights of the child with re­gard to its treat­ment of mi­grant chil­dren which amount­ed to dis­crim­i­na­tion. I have called out the Min­is­ter of Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty on fail­ure to up­hold the law re­gard­ing in­de­cen­cy of wear and be­hav­iour at Car­ni­val time. I have called out the Min­is­ter of Ed­u­ca­tion for as­sum­ing ju­ris­dic­tion over girls over age 16 to send them to MI­LAT. I was re­port­ed in the press as the sen­a­tor who told the min­is­ter of fi­nance he should apol­o­gise to the au­di­tor gen­er­al. I could go on and on,” she said.

“My back is broad, so I can take the neg­a­tive com­ments. But I must won­der where is the re­al ev­i­dence of lack of in­de­pen­dence? I have giv­en pre­sen­ta­tions and work­shops in 33 coun­tries of the world and be­long to 3 in­ter­na­tion­al or­gan­i­sa­tions and my re­spect is well in­tact. Who knows Mr Meighoo,” she quipped.

Ef­forts to con­tact oth­er In­de­pen­dent Sen­a­tors named by Meighoo, in­clud­ing Am­ri­ta De­onar­ine, Dr Var­ma Deyals­ingh, Charisse Seep­er­sad, and Paul Richards were un­suc­cess­ful.

PNM con­demns at­tack

PNM Gen­er­al Sec­re­tary and Op­po­si­tion Sen­a­tor Fos­ter Cum­mings has con­demned both Meighoo and Gov­ern­ment for what he de­scribed as “at­tacks” on In­de­pen­dent Sen­a­tors who crit­i­cised gov­ern­ment pol­i­cy in the Sen­ate.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored