JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, July 13, 2025

Eyes on gas price in mid-year Budget review

Game changers banking on Petrotrin entities, dry dock, bonds

by

Gail Alexander
2254 days ago
20190511

Nei­ther Gov­ern­ment sources—or the Op­po­si­tion—an­tic­i­pate Fi­nance Min­is­ter Colm Im­bert will in­crease the fu­el price in Mon­day's mid-year re­view.

But on­ly Im­bert's 45-minute (plus 15 ex­tra min­utes) re­view state­ment will say for sure.

In his 2019 Bud­get he had said that if oil prices re­mained above (US)$70 in this fis­cal year the fu­el sub­sidy would ex­ceed $1.5b in 2019 if there's no "ad­just­ment to the re­tail prices at the pump".

At Bud­get pre­sen­ta­tion last Oc­to­ber oil prices were (US)$73.43 and at that price, Im­bert said the fu­el sub­sidy in 2019 was es­ti­mat­ed to cost the Trea­sury $1.5b "...Mon­ey we sim­ply don't have."

He had pegged the Bud­get on a (US)$65 oil price, but fol­low­ing price drop in Jan­u­ary, he had ad­just­ed it to (US)$55 and telegraphed Bud­get pro­gramme re­vi­sion.

Yes­ter­day's oil price was (US)$61.66 (WTI crude) per bar­rel and (US)$70.62 (Brent crude)—un­der the 2018 (US)$73 price he was con­cerned about.

Im­bert's pro­nounce­ments on the per­for­mance on the $51b Bud­get over the last six months will be de­liv­ered in Par­lia­ment from 1.30 pm. He can get ex­tra time be­yond the al­lot­ted 60 min­utes' speak­ing time if nec­es­sary. Op­po­si­tion Leader Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar will have equal re­ply time.

Last Fri­day, gov­ern­ment of­fi­cials said they would be sur­prised if fu­el is raised, con­sid­er­ing the elec­tion cli­mate, eco­nom­ic is­sues the pub­lic has been cop­ing with and be­cause of Im­bert's re­cent "turn­around" de­c­la­ra­tions.

UNC whip David Lee added, "He'll hard­ly have room to hike fu­el prices be­cause of up­com­ing elec­tions. If he does, it'll be in­ter­est­ing to see what he does to bal­ance it. His rev­enues are down and de­spite his boasts IMF and World Bank are re­vis­ing their as­sess­ment on T&T, we've nev­er heard of them get­ting fig­ures wrong.

"We'll have to see if he'll use Na­tion­al In­vest­ment Fund bonds or bor­rows from the Her­itage and Sta­bil­i­sa­tion Fund. The Bud­get's six 'Game Chang­ers' are no longer in­tact and Gov­ern­ment's bor­rowed $700m from the In­fra­struc­ture De­vel­op­ment Fund to pay Petrotrin re­trench­ment ben­e­fits. So we are await­ing ex­pla­na­tion on his 'turn­around'."

Lo­cal Gov­ern­ment Min­is­ter Kaz­im Ho­sein be­lieves Im­bert's man­age­ment did well con­sid­er­ing what the PNM faced on as­sum­ing of­fice. "I'll have to say, yes. We just have to wait to see what he presents."

Ho­sein be­lieves Gov­ern­ment's Lo­cal Gov­ern­ment re­form—which he said peo­ple are press­ing for—will be a 'game chang­er'. "It's a promise and the re­form will come."

6 game-chang­ers

Gov­ern­ment's 2019 Bud­get banked on six 'game chang­ers'—as part of what the Bud­get de­scribed as strate­gic "con­fi­dence in­duc­ing de­vel­op­ments" which would make Gov­ern­ment's trans­for­ma­tion "an as­sured re­al­i­ty".

Here's how they were de­scribed in the Bud­get and where checks re­veal they are now:

• T&T/VENEZUELA DRAG­ON GAS PROJECT—The Bud­get stat­ed it would start with 150.0 mil­lion stan­dard cu­bic feet of gas which would "re­turn our petro­chem­i­cal sec­tor to full pro­duc­tion, mak­ing the sec­tor a much more at­trac­tive source of in­vest­ment".

Gov­ern­ment has ac­knowl­edged it's de­layed fol­low­ing Venezue­lan un­rest. Apart from the term sheet agree­ment, no legal­ly bind­ing doc­u­ment was signed. Le­gal ad­vice was be­ing sought on whether US sanc­tions against Venezuela may af­fect it.

• SAN­DALS RE­SORT—de­scribed as "cat­alyt­ic tourism event...rep­re­sent­ing rad­i­cal stim­u­lus for To­ba­go tourism pro­vid­ing plat­form for sus­tain­able eco­nom­ic/so­cial de­vel­op­ment". Af­ter Jan­u­ary an­nounce­ment it was out, Gov­ern­ment sig­nalled there may be al­ter­na­tives. Tourism of­fi­cials said Fri­day, ren­o­va­tions are about to start on Tur­tle Beach by Cana­da's Sun­wing group which pro­posed up­grade. That group al­so ex­pressed in­ter­est in the Mag­dale­na Grand, but cur­rent ne­go­ti­a­tions for an op­er­a­tor were al­ready in train and that's be­ing seen through to com­ple­tion, ex­pect­ed next month.

• TWO AUS­TRALIAN FER­RIES—to re­vi­talise the sea bridge due mid-2020. Yes­ter­day the Gov­ern­ment con­firmed work com­menced on the two Cape Class ves­sels with the cut­ting of the steel weeks ago and the Aus­tralia Gov­ern­ment had a cer­e­mo­ny re­gard­ing this.

• BUOY­AN­CY OF CAP­I­TAL MAR­KETS—Fol­low­ing the suc­cess of the $4B Na­tion­al In­vest­ment Fund bond, Gov­ern­ment is mov­ing to a $1b Hous­ing bond soon.

• LA BREA DRY DOCK & SHIP­BUILD­ING/RE­PAIR FA­CIL­I­TY—to gen­er­ate al­most 16,000 in­di­rect and di­rect jobs and pro­ject­ed to "en­er­gise for­mer­ly oil-based south/west com­mu­ni­ties". Launched last year, un­der con­struc­tion.

• RE­FORMED PETROTRIN—with suc­ces­sor en­ti­ties con­cen­trat­ing on ex­plo­ration/pro­duc­tion and boost­ing cur­rent pro­duc­tion lev­el of 40,000 bar­rels per day, "the Forex earn­ing of which would ben­e­fit cit­i­zens…we're tak­ing steps to en­sure work­ers are ap­pro­pri­ate­ly com­pen­sat­ed…"

OW­TU's sec­ond vice pres­i­dent Carl­ton Gib­son, said Fri­day for­mer work­ers still have open-end­ed is­sues in­clud­ing at In­land Rev­enue. BIR 's pro­cess­ing claims and OW­TU's await­ing fi­nal word on when work­ers will re­ceive monies. Mat­ters re­gard­ing the two-year med­ical plan are in the In­dus­tri­al Court as are oth­er out­stand­ing is­sues, in­clud­ing those pri­or to Petrotrin's clo­sure. While OW­TU awaits word on its bid for the re­fin­ery, Gib­son said some work­ers have found jobs at Her­itage and Paria Fu­el Trad­ing, some mi­grat­ed to Cana­da and the US, "...But many are still un­em­ployed."

Ju­ly con­clu­sion for re­fin­ery RF­Ps

With the suc­ces­sor en­ti­ties to Petrotrin among the six bud­getary game chang­ers, tran­si­tion team chair­man LISA ALI replied to ques­tions on the sta­tus of cur­rent is­sues con­cern­ing the sit­u­a­tion. Ali leads Trinidad Pe­tro­le­um Hold­ings Lim­it­ed’s (TPHL) trans­for­ma­tion team and is the in­ter­im Ter­mi­nal and Trad­ing Gen­er­al Man­ag­er for Paria Fu­el Trad­ing Com­pa­ny Lim­it­ed, one of the three suc­ces­sors Petrotrin sub­sidiaries.

She holds a De­gree in Chem­istry and An­a­lyt­i­cal Chem­istry (Hons) and a Mas­ters in Busi­ness Ad­min­is­tra­tion from the Uni­ver­si­ty of the West In­dies. She has a tech­ni­cal back­ground; hav­ing worked for 16 years in man­u­fac­tur­ing and petro­chem­i­cal in­dus­tries in se­nior Tech­ni­cal and ex­ec­u­tive roles work­ing at lo­cal­ly-based methanol plants. In 2006, she tran­si­tioned in­to Hu­man Re­sources (HR) work­ing as HR Vice Pres­i­dent for BP’s Trinidad busi­ness where she im­ple­ment­ed a na­tion­al­i­sa­tion work­force strat­e­gy and pro­gressed BP Trinidad’s di­ver­si­ty and in­clu­sion agen­da.

Ali sub­se­quent­ly moved in­to the oil and gas in­dus­try spend­ing over 14 years, hold­ing po­si­tions both lo­cal­ly and in­ter­na­tion­al­ly. She’s un­der­tak­en as­sign­ments in Brazil as the HR Vice Pres­i­dent; the UK and the Mid­dle East

—and has a wide range of ex­pe­ri­ence, hav­ing man­aged a num­ber of large-scale glob­al busi­ness trans­for­ma­tions. Her po­si­tion pri­or to re­turn­ing to T&T was Hu­man Re­sources Vice Pres­i­dent for BP (Up­stream, Tal­ent and Learn­ing).

Q: Af­ter Fi­nance Min­is­ter Colm Im­bert pro­ject­ed the re­fin­ery would be leased to an “...ac­cept­able op­er­a­tor by year-end”, what’s the cur­rent sta­tus of Re­quests for Pro­pos­als for it?

A: We’re cur­rent­ly in the non-bind­ing first round phase of the trans­ac­tion. This phase in­volved open in­vi­ta­tion to po­ten­tial buy­ers fol­lowed by the sign­ing of non-dis­clo­sure agree­ments by in­ter­est­ed par­ties, who were then al­lowed ac­cess to our da­ta room to re­view tech­ni­cal and fi­nan­cial in­for­ma­tion to pre­pare their non-bind­ing pro­pos­als.

Q: From which coun­tries have ex­pres­sions of in­ter­est come?

A: We have glob­al in­ter­est and par­tic­i­pa­tion in the process in­clud­ing lo­cal par­ties. We’re at a con­fi­den­tial stage and un­able to share fur­ther de­tails cur­rent­ly.

Q: How many, if any, of in­ter­est­ed par­ties have ex­pressed in­ter­est in some arrange­ment with Paria? Is a sep­a­rate RFP out for Paria?

A: Paria com­pris­es as­sets that were part of the in­te­grat­ed oil com­pa­ny. Any­one op­er­at­ing the re­fin­ery would need ac­cess to the ter­mi­nal as­sets to bring crude in­to T&T and ex­port fin­ished prod­uct as part of their busi­ness. Paria’s as­sets have there­fore been in­clud­ed in the RFP to al­low for the widest range of pro­pos­als, there­by en­sur­ing T&T gets best pos­si­ble val­ue for its as­sets. There is one RFP.

Q: How far has the process pro­gressed?

A: We’re cur­rent­ly in the non-bind­ing first round stage; 25 of the 70 par­ties have signed con­fi­den­tial­i­ty agree­ments.

Q: When is a de­ci­sion like­ly on the re­fin­ery; will it take longer if the in­cor­po­ra­tion of Paria is fac­tored in?

A: We’re work­ing with a time­line of end of Ju­ly to have a de­ci­sion on a pre­ferred par­ty. How­ev­er, it’s dif­fi­cult to say in the ab­sence of con­crete pro­pos­als. We want to en­sure an ef­fi­cient process, ac­quir­ing com­pet­i­tive bids and de­riv­ing the best val­ue for the coun­try’s as­sets.

Q: Is it like­ly the re­fin­ery could be up be­fore the first year of Petrotrin’s clo­sure?

A: We’re work­ing very hard to get the best val­ue for T&T.

Q: How much of the $1.4m worth of drugs at Petrotrin’s Au­gus­tus Long hos­pi­tal up to last De­cem­ber, re­mains in­tact and how much ex­pired?

A: The drugs were do­nat­ed to South West Re­gion­al Health Au­thor­i­ty who’s al­ready tak­en pos­ses­sion.

Q: What’s oc­cur­ring with the rest of Petrotrin’s as­sets?

A: Non-core as­sets have been se­cured. There have been in­stances of pil­fer­age and ma­li­cious van­dal­ism. We’re do­ing every­thing prac­ti­cal to min­imise this. With po­lice and mil­i­tary sup­port we’re en­sur­ing per­sons en­gag­ing in these acts are dealt with ac­cord­ing to T&T’s laws. Gov­ern­ment is the ul­ti­mate own­er of as­sets and will make a fi­nal de­ter­mi­na­tion on what’s to be done with them.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored