Political analysts are describing the Prime Minister’s decision to reassign the responsibilities of more than 10 Government ministries as a sign of dissatisfaction with some of her ministers’ performance.
The move comes less than two months after she delivered a fiery warning to her ministers.
The reassignment, formally published in the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette on Saturday evening, follows Persad-Bissessar’s 100-day address in which she issued a stern message to Government officials about integrity and loyalty.
At the time, the Prime Minister had warned against corrupt practices and alignment with members of the opposition People’s National Movement. She threatened to “buss” their heads, adding:
“All the things some of you did and think you get away in 2010–2015 will not be repeated. It seems some people have not learnt anything in the last ten years… this is a warning, the 100-day warning, straighten up, fix yourself, behave yourself, too many thousands of persons are depending on us.”
Her first set of reassignments was formally approved by President Christine Kangaloo with effect from October 3, acting on the Prime Minister’s advice under Section 79(1) of the Constitution.
Early warning or inner circle?
Political analyst Dr Shane Mohammed described the changes as a “realignment” rather than a full reshuffle, suggesting the move reflects the Prime Minister’s dissatisfaction with some ministers’ performance.
“So, this is an early warning. ‘If you don’t believe that I was observing you in the last six months, here’s your notice. And I have taken notice of where the weaknesses are, what needs to be realigned, what needs to be fixed’, because we have to take into consideration as well— you win government, one. You create a Cabinet, two. You have to now focus on the schedules and what you want, who to hold where, and see how it works in three months, in six months. That’s a good, smart tooling approach.”
He dismissed speculation that Persad-Bissessar was forming an inner Cabinet, saying, “I don’t believe we are going to see the formation of a cabal that is going to spin the Prime Minister into a web.”
However, political analyst Winford James warned that the reassignments could raise doubts about Persad-Bissessar’s decision-making and her grasp of ministerial capacity.
“It’s giving us a very uncomfortable sense. The Prime Minister may not be fully aware of the capabilities of the people she has to distribute among responsibilities and ministries... Now, that could affect the confidence in our leadership.”
He also criticised the absence of wider consultation.
“The fact that we voted you into power does not mean that you shouldn’t continue to seek our guidance, what we might wish to say. It’s better for governance overall. But if she keeps doing what you have reported that she has done, then it’s going to affect the trust of the public, the public’s confidence in her ability to lead.”
‘A distraction prime minister’
A political commentator, who requested anonymity, said the reassignment signals Persad-Bissessar’s admission that her initial Cabinet choices may have fallen short.
“Because if you knew what kind of governance you were looking for, you would find the most appropriate person,” the analyst said.
The commentator suggested the changes point to the emergence of an informal inner circle.
“We’re seeing symbols, public symbols, that suggest the formation or the implementation of an inner Cabinet... that there is an erosion of confidence of certain ministers to deliver what the Prime Minister expects.”
The commentator added: “She can be described as a distraction Prime Minister who uses the principles of distraction to cover up the inability to deliver a different governance.”
The commentator referred to the budget not being called up to yesterday evening, and the relations with Venezuela as issues the Prime Minister hoped to move the public’s attention away from.
Between 2010 and 2015, Persad-Bissessar made nine Cabinet adjustments during her previous People’s Partnership administration, according to political scientist Professor Hamid Ghany in a Guardian editorial published on September 11, 2016.