JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, July 28, 2025

Raymond: Negative publicity not real reason for Sandals pullout

by

Rhondor Dowlat
2385 days ago
20190115
Afra Raymond

Afra Raymond

TONY HOWELL

For­mer head of the Joint Con­sul­ta­tive Coun­cil (JCC) Afra Ray­mond said he strong­ly be­lieves that neg­a­tive pub­lic­i­ty is not the re­al rea­son why San­dals Re­sorts pulled out of the To­ba­go San­dals project.

He spec­u­lates that it could have been “What are the ‘Un­der­ly­ing Com­mer­cial Arrange­ments’?

“I don’t be­lieve that the San­dals Brand suf­fered any neg­a­tive pub­lic­i­ty, least of all from my work. There is no doubt that San­dals is a top-draw­er brand in the lux­u­ry re­sort sec­tor, the ques­tion my work is di­rect­ed to - “What are the ‘Un­der­ly­ing Com­mer­cial Arrange­ments’?” Ray­mond said.

Ad­mit­ting that he thought yes­ter­day’s me­dia con­fer­ence was to an­nounce the sign­ing of the To­ba­go San­dals deal, Ray­mond said he was glad to have been wrong, “Well I am glad to have been wrong since my orig­i­nal guess was that to­day’s (yes­ter­day) meet­ing was go­ing to an­nounce the sign­ing of the To­ba­go San­dals deal. It is not a good thing, be­cause we still do not re­al­ly un­der­stand what has hap­pened here.”

On No­vem­ber 29, 2018, at the first hear­ing of Ray­mond’s Ju­di­cial Re­view of the re­fusal of the Of­fice of the Prime Min­is­ter (OPM) to pro­vide a copy of the To­ba­go San­dals Mem­o­ran­dum of Un­der­stand­ing (MoU) which he had re­quest­ed un­der the Free­dom of In­for­ma­tion Act (FOIA) on Feb­ru­ary 27 2018, the OPM agreed to pro­vide the MoU and pay Ray­mond’s costs.

The MoU was signed on Oc­to­ber 10, 2017, and ini­tial­ly, the pub­lic was told by Row­ley and Young that its de­tails could not be pub­lished as that would un­der­mine the ne­go­ti­a­tions.

How­ev­er, at a sub­se­quent me­dia con­fer­ence, Young dis­closed the doc­u­ment.

Ac­cord­ing to Ray­mond, in the MoU, there were many pos­i­tive fea­tures in favour of San­dals.

Ray­mond ex­plained to the Guardian Me­dia yes­ter­day that the main red flag in the MoU was the com­i­cal zig-zag­ging be­tween ‘there is no se­cret’ but ‘we can’t breach the con­fi­den­tial­i­ty clause.’

“I even wrote to San­dals to ask for the MoU af­ter they were re­peat­ing how there is no se­cret, but they al­so didn’t want to share. When the MoU was fi­nal­ly re­vealed af­ter my law­suit, the terms were shown to be law­ful with the State mak­ing all the cap­i­tal in­vest­ment; no guar­an­tees or quo­tas as to jobs, sup­pli­ers or ser­vices; Gov­ern­ment agree­ing to prompt­ly pro­vide as many work per­mits as re­quired; trans­fer-pric­ing was be­ing fa­cil­i­tat­ed via this agree­ment and San­dals was plac­ing no cap­i­tal at risk. None. It was re­al­ly To­ba­go Love,” Ray­mond said.

Last year, dur­ing the 2019 bud­get pre­sen­ta­tion, Fi­nance Min­is­ter Colm Im­bert had iden­ti­fied the San­dals project as a turn­ing point for the To­ba­go econ­o­my with a pro­ject­ed US$80 mil­lion per year in rev­enue (TT$480 mil­lion).

The re­sort was to be built at Buc­coo/Gold­en Grove and owned by the Gov­ern­ment and eq­ui­ty part­ners, but the ho­tel was to be man­aged and op­er­at­ed by San­dals Re­sorts In­ter­na­tion­al. The 1000-room ho­tel was ex­pect­ed to em­ploy some 2000 peo­ple.

Asked of its pro­ject­ed rev­enue, Rain­er made it clear that they have nev­er sat down to ne­go­ti­ate so he was not go­ing to re­lease a num­ber, “be­cause it would just cause a de­bate that is fruit­less.”

He, how­ev­er, not­ed that they would re­turn, “We love Trinidad and To­ba­go…it is a des­ti­na­tion in a Caribbean coun­try, part of the Caribbean from a tourism per­spec­tive will worth it in de­vel­op­ing but we have to have the right en­vi­ron­ment to do so.”

Mi­nor­i­ty Leader of the To­ba­go House of As­sem­bly, Wat­son Duke in thank­ing San­dals for sav­ing To­ba­go’s wet­lands said that they will wel­come them back for re-ne­go­ti­a­tions in the fu­ture but added that they (mean­ing To­ba­go) would “want to have a say in fu­ture ne­go­ti­a­tions.” He said the time was not right now and be­lieves that there was no trans­paren­cy in the process from the start.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored