Senior Reporter/Producer
kay-marie.fletcher@guardian.co.tt
BEIJING, China—Former foreign affairs minister Dr Amery Browne is urging the government to intensify diplomatic relations, while historian Dr Jerome Teelucksingh warns that World War III is no longer a matter of if, but when.
Their concerns followed China’s 80th anniversary commemoration of its victory in the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression, held in Beijing on Wednesday.
Against the backdrop of rising global tensions, China marked the end of World War II with a display of remembrance, unity, and modern military might. President Xi Jinping was flanked by Russian president Vladimir Putin and North Korea’s Kim Jong-un in Tiananmen Square, underscoring shifting alliances and Beijing’s growing geopolitical influence.
For some analysts, it was also a signal that China’s diplomatic reach could rival that of the US-led world order.
But what does this mean for T&T? Beyond its historical role as a strategic US military base and vital oil hub during the war, the country now faces a familiar question: should it remain aligned with Washington, or begin exploring new partnerships that could reshape its future?
Speaking to Guardian Media, Dr Teelucksingh said T&T must brace itself for global instability.
“The world is on the brink of a world war… If a conflict does occur, millions will die, and it could mean long-term effects on us,” he warned.
While stressing the need for preparation, he cautioned that breaking away from Washington could be costly.
“We don’t have that global clout to say who we are supporting or not. The United States has a good relationship with us, not just in countering drug trafficking but for trade, and we can’t jeopardise that.”
He also urged policymakers to keep the potential fallout in mind as the national budget approaches.
“If a war erupts, the Middle East will take a stance. Iran was invited to that event (in Beijing), so we need to be looking at the price of oil and how these tensions may affect us.”
A call for balanced diplomacy
While both experts agree T&T should maintain neutrality, Dr Browne believes the government must expand its diplomatic reach.
“What is required of us is to intensify our relations in all directions—with the Latin American region, with China, with countries in the Far East such as Singapore and Malaysia, with Europe as well. It cannot be one pursued at the expense of others. This is where balanced foreign policy and wise diplomatic engagement come into play. I’m not sure that is what is being deployed in Port of Spain at this time,” he said.
Dr Browne added that major powers are increasingly coordinating to build a multi-polar world, and T&T must pay attention.
“China, India, Brazil, and in some cases Russia, are meeting more, engaging in summits, and exploring possibilities. Trinidad and Tobago must remain guided by its proven foreign policy principles, which have carried us through turbulent times.”
Guardian Media sought comment from Foreign and Caricom Affairs Minister Sean Sobers, but he has not yet responded.
Dr Teelucksingh also appealed to regional leaders and scholars, including UN General Assembly president Ambassador Dennis Francis and Caribbean intellectuals, to use their platforms to call for peace. Efforts to contact UWI vice-chancellor Sir Hilary Beckles were unsuccessful.
From Beijing’s stage to Caribbean shores, one thing is clear: the world is shifting. For T&T, the pressing question remains — which side of history will we choose?